10 Mar
2004
10 Mar
'04
11:38 a.m.
On 10-03 11:01, Curro wrote:
As you can see, what I'm trying to do is studying
IMS and use SER for
it. So, I wanted to start by little problems like headers.
It could be helpful whether someone could give me his/her point of view
about IMS and SER. It means, what big problems they see to adapt SER to
act as IMS Proxy and, on the other hand, what things they think could be
easily done, maybe with little changes on modules?.
It could help me to know how big could be this work, and whether it's
worth or not. I imagine that it's not a priority to Iptel's guys (or it
is?) write or adapt modules in order to adapt SER to IMS.
No, it is not our priority since we have no use for it.
By the way, a question about writting new module.
Based on your
experience, how many time and people could take write a new module based
on rr to add Path header and extract information from headers?
This is hard to estimate, it depends a lot on your coding skills and
experience, if you are familiar with ser internals and fluent in C
then it should not take you more than a couple of days.
Jan.