6 Mar
2008
6 Mar
'08
7:17 p.m.
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes:
2) add new feature to manage/control C timer (like
onreply route change
support, different routes for timeout and failures, etc)..
Is this commonly agreed?
as long some backwards compatibility is retained, i.e., it should not be
mandatory to split current failure route into failure and timeout route,
for example.
-- juha