18 May
2015
18 May
'15
9:59 a.m.
Hello,
but fix_nated_sdp() is changing the SDP (body) not Contact header. Maybe
you had fix_nated_contact(). If yes, you should use set_contact_alias()
instead, along with handle_ruri_alias() -- see default kamailio.cfg for
version 4.2 for a sample of how to use these two functions.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 18/05/15 08:31, Darren Campbell (Primar) wrote:
It appears the ACK had an R-URI from original INVITE
and wasn't using
the IP address in the new Contact from the 200 OK.
Commented out a call to fix_nated_sdp(); which resolved this case, now
completing a round of testing to check whether any new faults have
been introduced from the change.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla [miconda(a)gmail.com]
*Sent:* Saturday, 16 May 2015 3:57 AM
*To:* Darren Campbell (Primar); Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch
Yes, you can send me directly, just notify here so I will look in the
global inbox, because I check it quire rarely -- I is a lot of
unsolicited emails I get there and I have filters for the mailing
list, so if no filter is selecting the email to put it in a dedicated
folder, it may take ages to look at it if I am not aware of being sent.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 15/05/15 04:51, Darren Campbell (Primar) wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
Thank you Daniel, is it OK to send these logs
directly to you? I'd
prefer to not disclose them to the list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla [miconda(a)gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, 12 May 2015 7:03 PM
*To:* Darren Campbell (Primar); Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Repeated 200 OK from Enswitch
On 12/05/15 10:06, Darren Campbell (Primar) wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com Here's the full conversation. Makes me wonder
whether the ACK needs
to go back to the same host that handled the INVITE or whether it
should be returned to the host mentioned in "c=IN IP4
PROVIDERMEDIAIP" in the 200 OK.
You still gave the conversation in one side,
towards the provider.
You need to get the traffic from caller side as well, which is
listening on 127.0.0.1, but it is important to see what that side
sends and receives. You have to grab the traffic on lo interface as well.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com