On 3/21/07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < daniel@voice-system.ro> wrote:

Hello,

On 03/21/07 21:44, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
> Hi Daniel.
>
> Some time ago, I tried to compile Openser for 64 bits, but I had
> problems with libradiusclient, when It was compiled for 64 bits.
>
> Is that problem solved? Could I run Openser + MySQL + Radius support
> compiled as 64 bit?
haven't tried myself, but as I could see, there were several fixes for
libradiusclient on 64b. You should give another try.

Cheers,
Daniel

>
> Kind regards.
>
> Sergio G.
>
> On 3/21/07, *Daniel-Constantin Mierla* < daniel@voice-system.ro
> <mailto: daniel@voice-system.ro>> wrote:
>
>     Hello,
>
>     On 03/21/07 20:14, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
>     > Hi Daniel.
>     >
>     > I am repeating the test using 6 instances of SIPp, and I am having a
>     > better performance.
>     >
>     > A question. In the page you have listed that the Proxy and UAS
>     runs on
>     > a 64 bit machine. Was the compilation done to generate a 64 bit
>     > executable?
>     yes, it was 64bit executable. OS is Debian amd64.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Daniel
>
>     >
>     > Thanks.
>     >
>     > Kind regards.
>     >
>     > Sergio Gutierrez
>     >
>     > On 3/21/07, *Sergio Gutierrez* < saguti@gmail.com
>     <mailto: saguti@gmail.com>
>     > <mailto:saguti@gmail.com <mailto: saguti@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Hi Daniel.
>     >
>     >     Thanks for your answer.
>     >
>     >     My configs are as the same used in published tests, and my
>     UAS, as
>     >     described is another instance of Openser.
>     >
>     >     I will try what you sugest.
>     >
>     >     Thanks.
>     >
>     >     Sergio Gutiérrez.
>     >
>     >
>     >     On 3/21/07, *Daniel-Constantin Mierla* <
>     daniel@voice-system.ro <mailto: daniel@voice-system.ro>
>     >     <mailto: daniel@voice-system.ro
>     <mailto:daniel@voice-system.ro>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >         Hello,
>     >
>     >         do you use same configs as in published tests? The UAS
>     is another
>     >         openser with just sending a 200 ok reply or sipp with uas
>     >         scenario?
>     >
>     >         First check what is the capacity of sipp -- make a very
>     simple
>     >         config
>     >         with just sl_send_reply("200","ok") in main route and start
>     >         sipp. See
>     >         what results you get and that should be the reference
>     for sipp
>     >         capacity.
>     >         Also, try to use multiple instances of sipp, from different
>     >         servers, see
>     >         if you get the cumulative value better.
>     >
>     >         The tests were done on Core2 processor, and parallel
>     execution of
>     >         openser processes has some impact as well.
>     >
>     >         Cheers,
>     >         Daniel
>     >
>     >
>     >         On 03/21/07 16:52, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
>     >         > Hi.
>     >         >
>     >         > Currently I am installing Openser 1.2.0 on a Sun Fire
>     T2000
>     >         running
>     >         > Solaris 10.
>     >         > Although I used an optimized version of GCC for SPARC
>     >         Systems, and
>     >         > used the recommended settings to generate accurate
>     code for my
>     >         > Processor (UltraSPARC T1), the results of the performance
>     >         tests are
>     >         > just 50% of the presented ones on the web page.
>     >         >
>     >         > My setup is the following:
>     >         >
>     >         > Proxy and UAS: Sun Fire T2000, 8 GB RAM, 1 UltraSPARC
>     T1 1.2
>     >         GHZ 6 Core.
>     >         > UAC's: Two domain of a Sun Fire 12K, 4 GB RAM, 4 UlraSPARC
>     >         III+ 900 Mhz
>     >         > Software versions listed as on the webpage.
>     >         >
>     >         > openser -V output:
>     >         > version: openser 1.2.0-notls (sparc/solaris)
>     >         > flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE,
>     USE_MCAST,
>     >         > SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC,
>     >         FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT-NOSMP
>     >         > ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144,
>     >         MAX_LISTEN 16,
>     >         > MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
>     >         > poll method support: poll, select, /dev/poll.
>     >         > svnrevision: unknown
>     >         > @(#) $Id: main.c 1827 2007-03-12 15:22:53Z bogdan_iancu $
>     >         > main.c compiled on 21:43:51 Mar 19 2007 with gcc 4.0.3
>     >         >
>     >         >
>     >         > I would thank any idea about how could I improve the
>     >         performnace of my
>     >         > setup. I think that because of the hardware
>     specifications,
>     >         the result
>     >         > should be at least equal than listed.
>     >         >
>     >         > Thanks in advance.
>     >         >
>     >         > Kind regards.
>     >         >
>     >         > Sergio Gutiérrez.
>     >         >
>     >         >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >         >
>     >         > _______________________________________________
>     >         > Users mailing list
>     >         > Users@openser.org <mailto: Users@openser.org>
>     <mailto:Users@openser.org <mailto: Users@openser.org>>
>     >         > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>     >         >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>