yes, correct bogdan
Richard wrote:
final reply? So is it any response >=200?
-----Original Message----- From: Bogdan-Andrei IANCU [mailto:iancu@fokus.fraunhofer.de] Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 9:09 AM To: Richard Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] fr_inv_timer
fr_timer is stopped when a final reply is received.
bogdan
Richard wrote:
Hi,
Can someone tell me what triggers to cancel the fr_inv_timer for INVITE? Is it 200 OK or ACK?
I have a cpl with "force_stateful" doing ring both. So a call is parallel fork into two branches. When one phone is pickup, 200 OK and ACK are correctly delivered. The unused branch is also CANCEL-ed correctly. The problem is that somehow ser didn't stop the transaction timer for INVITE. After "fr_inv_timer" is timeout, ser sends a "487 Request Cancelled" to the original caller and forces a disconnect.
Thanks,
Richard
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers