5 Nov
2005
5 Nov
'05
8:38 p.m.
hi
wouldn't it be simpler to use remove_hf("..");
-A
* Federico Giannici <giannici(a)neomedia.it> [051105 19:07]:
brett-ser-list wrote:
I;m not entirely sure, but consume_credentials
might take care of this..
No, it deletes only "used" credentials.
Anyway, I solved simply removing the Proxy-Authorization header fileds
with a simple replace() function from every ACK, CANCEL and BYE messages
(they shouldn't have it, anyway).
Bye.
---------- Original Message
----------------------------------
From: Federico Giannici <giannici(a)neomedia.it>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:50:29 +0100
>I have found that some UAs (e.g Grandstream's ones) send the
>Proxy-Authorization header even in ACKs messages.
>
>As we don't explicitly try to authenticate ACKs, we cannot use the
>consume_credentials() function. In fact, it seems that we have to call
>proxy_authorize() before we can use the consume_credentials(). But it's
>contrary to RFC to call proxy_authorize() for ACKs and CANCELs methods!
>
>So, how can we prevent the Proxy-Authorization information to be
>forwarded to subsequent hops?
>
>
>Thanks.
>
--
___________________________________________________
__
|- giannici(a)neomedia.it
|ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it
___________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers