I&#39;ve now verified that berkeley db creation works in the 3.1 branch. Good work!<div><br></div><div>/noa<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:miconda@gmail.com">miconda@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

  
    
  
  <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"><div class="im">
    <br>
    <br>
    On 12/29/10 6:48 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <br>
      <br>
      On 12/29/10 6:44 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div>
          <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM,
            Daniel-Constantin Mierla <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:miconda@gmail.com" target="_blank">miconda@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">
              <div>
                <div><br>
                  <br>
                  On 12/27/10 2:09 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:<br>
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex"> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
                    writes:<br>
                    <br>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex"> Juha, can the
                      files for former lcr module tables &#39;gw&#39; and &#39;lcr&#39;
                      be<br>
                      removed?<br>
                    </blockquote>
                    yes, in 3.1 lcr module uses these three tables:
                    lcr_gw, lcr_rule,<br>
                    lcr_rule_target.<br>
                    <br>
                  </blockquote>
                </div>
              </div>
              ok, done, cherry-picked in 3.1 for dbtext and db_berkeley.
              <div><br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            
            Great. I tried building .debs from the 3.1 branch (last
            commit 553190) and indeed it reinits the database of DBTEXT
            type correctly. Not for db_berkeley though.</div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      thanks for trying and reporting. db_berkely wasn&#39;t fixed indeed, I
      will do it in moments.<br>
    </blockquote></div>
    actually I backported for db_berkeley as well -- first time I
    thought i didn&#39;t do it.<br>
    <br>
    However, the fix for db_berkely was done one day later than for
    dbtext, the commit hash 8442fb34 -- take again the latest version of
    the branch.<div class="im"><br>
    <br>
    Cheers,<br>
    Daniel<br>
    <pre cols="72">-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Kamailio (OpenSER) Advanced Training
Jan 24-26, 2011, Irvine, CA, USA
<a href="http://www.asipto.com" target="_blank">http://www.asipto.com</a></pre>
  </div></div>

</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Everything is secret.<br>
</div>