I think I might have just answered my own question:
From
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.1.x/modules/rtpproxy-ng.html#rtpproxy-ng…:
---
r - flags that IP address in SDP should be trusted. Without this flag,
rtpproxy ignores address in the SDP and uses source address of the SIP
message as media address which is passed to the RTP proxy.
---
Still, any elaboration welcome.
On 06/07/2014 12:39 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Hello,
I'm invoking mediaproxy-ng with rtpproxy_offer/answer("ow") and am
getting a scenario where:
INVITE is forwarded to signalling gateway xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, which returns
an SDP answer of yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:51964. rtpproxy is invoked in both
directions. However, media forwarded from media endpoint A is sent to
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:51964 (the correct port, but to the signalling gateway),
rather than yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:51964, which is what's specified in the SDP
answer in the 200 OK from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.
No media is coming back to mediaproxy-ng from yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:51964. The
cause of this is a separate and logically unrelated issue. Nevertheless,
I am curious as to why mediaproxy-ng doesn't send media from the near
end to yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:51964--in other words, to the specified SDP
endpoint on the far end, rather than to the signalling gateway.
I initially imagined that this might be due to the "w" option to
rtpproxy_offer(), which the documentation says forces symmetric RTP.
However, this behaviour is not elaborated upon or defined. I tried
removing the 'w' option but seem to be getting the same result.
Is this a default behaviour of COMEDIA-style source port latching? In
other words, does mediaproxy-ng need to latch onto incoming RTP from
yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:51964 before it will send media there, as opposed to the
signalling gateway? If so, is there any way this behaviour can be
disabled, so that mediaproxy-ng simply follows SDP in all cases?
Thanks,
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web:
http://www.evaristesys.com/,
http://www.alexbalashov.com/
Please be kind to the English language:
http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/232906