Thanks for that!
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
you have to edit the Makefile.defs, comment the line with -DDBG_QM_MALLOC and uncomment the one with -DF_MALLOC (somewhere around line 300). Then recompile&reinstall -- do not forget the radius modules, they are not compiled/installed by default.
Daniel
On 04/12/05 02:03, Rod Bacon wrote:
Can someone please let me know how to get rid of all the "extra debug information", as I am trying to debug a RADIUS problem, but can't find any useful info because of all the memory debug stuff that's in the way.
----- Original Message ----- *From:* Java Rockx <mailto:javarockx@gmail.com> *To:* Steve Blair <mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu> *Cc:* serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org> ; Rod Bacon <mailto:rod.bacon@empoweredcomms.com.au> *Sent:* Friday, April 08, 2005 3:21 AM *Subject:* Re: [Serusers] 0.9.0 Stability Thanks for the info. The thing to keep in mind with ser-0.9.x is that I belive extra debug information is still enabled in the Makefile. Regards, Paul On Apr 7, 2005 12:41 PM, *Steve Blair* <blairs@isc.upenn.edu <mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu>> wrote: Paul: Two things=are getting me right now both are errors with serctl. The main problem =s the inability to add/delete aliases. It seems SER remembers the previ=usly defined alias but serctl will not delete it. Therefore I cannot re=lace that alias with a new one. One other annoying iss=e is the copious amount of log messages that are written to syslog when=the server is shutdown. It is so bad I've actually stored up several ch=nges, schedule an outage, reboot the entire machine, implement the chan=es and hope I haven't made a mistake. I'd have to c=eck on the version but I think it is 0.9.1 and the last checkout was ab=ut one week ago. Java Rockx wrote: > Steve= > > Can you give a few examples of the "odd little behav=ors" you see with > ser-0.9? > > Also, are you usin= 0.9.0 or 0.9.1. If 0.9.1, how recent was your CVS > checkout? &g=; > Regards, > Paul > > On Apr 7, 2005 6:24 AM, *S=eve Blair* <blairs@isc.upenn.ed= <mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu> > <mailto:blairs@isc=upenn.edu <mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu>>> wrote: > > > &nbs=; Rod: > > Overall I'd say=yes. The avp functionality has been the biggest win > &nb=p; for us. > We still have several odd=little behaviors some of which
are > actuall= bugs. > This is a little unnerving on produ=tion systems but we are using > the 0.9.0
> > &n=sp; -Steve > > Rod Bacon wrote:<=r>> > > I understand that the latest &=uot;stable" release is still 0.8.14, but > &nb=p; > what are peoples general experiences with 0.9.0? > &nbs=; > > > Is it worth the up=rade? > > > => _______________________________________________ > &n=sp; > Serusers mailing list > > =a href="mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org">serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org> > =nbsp; > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers <http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/s=rusers> > >= _______________________________________________*> Serusers mailing list > &nb=p; serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org> <=ailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>> =gt; http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers <http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listi=fo/serusers> >*> -- ISC Network Engineering The University of Pennsy=vania 3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A Philadelphia, PA 19104 v=ice: 215-573-8396 215-746-8001=br> fax: 215-898-9348 si=:blairs@upenn.edu <mailto:sip:blairs@upenn.edu> ** ** ** ** **
** ****_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers**
**
**
** _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers **