15 Nov
2004
15 Nov
'04
6:44 p.m.
Hi Girish,
Maybe my sentence was a little too ambiguous :-). Just to rephrase:
"when you use append_hf() the modification will be reflected on the
message only when forwarded".
If you try your approach, it will be a discrepancy between what SER and
the phones think the expire value is. SER will consider the one received
in the original req. (it will ignore the new value forced from script
via append_hf() ) and the client will consider the value received in
reply ( the one forced from script via append_to_reply() ).
You can easily check this via "serctl ul show" and to see if the expire
time is the one you force from script.
Best regards,
Marian
Girish wrote:
Hello,
--- Marian Dumitru <marian.dumitru(a)voice-sistem.ro> wrote:
--
Voice Sistem
http://www.voice-sistem.ro
when you use append_hf() the modification will not
reflect on the
message only when forwarded. So even if you add the Expired hdr, it will
I think you meant 'will reflect'. right?
Here we use append_hf and append_to_reply to set the expires timeout with our softphone.
And
haven't noticed any problem so far. May be append_to_reply is doing the trick.
More appropriate is to use "min_expires"
registrar parameter.
Thanks for this info. I did not know about this.
Best regards,
Marian
Best Regards,
=====
Girish Gopinath <gr_sh2003(a)yahoo.com>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com