[SR-Users] Re: how to call loose_route() after adding route header without using msg_apply_changes?

Given a call flowlike the one shown, you could consider using redirects from the registrar rather than passing traffic through the registrar. I agree that this does very much feel like a place where a B2BUA is appropriate given what may be a very non-standard implementation by another UA. With that said it's fairly cheap and easy to add more kamailio to any environment - even use alternate ports as needed and run it in a container. Regards, Kaufman ________________________________ From: Alex Balashov via sr-users <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2024 5:54 AM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> Cc: Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> Subject: [SR-Users] Re: how to call loose_route() after adding route header without using msg_apply_changes? CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. As far as I know, this situation badly cries out for a lightweight B2BUA. It's no accident that pretty much all SBCs are based on a B2BUA. However, I could be mistaken... -- Alex -- Alex Balashov Principal Consultant Evariste Systems LLC Web: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fevaristes… Tel: +1-706-510-6800 __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! K