Re: [SR-Users] Force socket on reply

Hello, Please find the diff. t_reply_A.c is the orginal and t_reply_B.c is the modified file. --- t_reply_A.c 2011-10-14 10:05:45.093352500 -0400 +++ t_reply_B.c 2011-10-16 01:10:53.179916800 -0400 @@ -1726,6 +1726,8 @@ reply route */ SND_FLAGS_OR(&uas_rb->dst.send_flags, &uas_rb->dst.send_flags, &relayed_msg->rpl_send_flags); + /* Make the response to use the same IP where it receives the message */ + uas_rb->dst.send_flags.f |= SND_F_FORCE_SOCKET; } } update_reply_stats( relayed_code ); Thanks JIjo On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com > Hello, > > can you send the patch with 'git diff' or 'diff -u' -- it will be easier to > apply and analyze it. Once I get it, I will look over the case you reported > in more details. > > Thanks, > Daniel > > > On 10/13/11 10:23 PM, Jijo wrote: > > Hi Daniel.. > > I'm using version 3.1.0. I looked at the change but its done only for > forward_reply.. How about relay_reply()? > > Thanks > Jijo > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < > miconda(a)gmail.com> >> Hello, >> >> I haven't understood exactly what you tried? Was it use of >> force_send_socket(...) in onreply_route and didn't work? If yes, what >> version are you runing, there was a fix for such case some time ago: >> >> >> http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=9dbf735… >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> >> On 10/13/11 1:00 AM, Jijo wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Our system has two IP address, one is used for kamailio and 2nd one is >> used for data. >> The problem is suppose a request came in to kamailio on a TCP connection >> with first IP address and connection is torned down before sending the >> response. Later when the response is send out kamialio is using the 2nd IP >> to create the connection. The reason is kamailio doesn't have force socket >> in in reply, so it uses INADDR_ANY for soruce addres .so kernel uses source >> address based on the detaintion IP. >> >> I tired to force the socket using pseudo variable $fs or >> force_send_socket(), but neither of them worked from reply_route. >> >> So i modfied the code relay_replay to set the SND_F_FORCE_SOCKET which >> will use the address where request is recieved as source address to make >> the TCP connection The code change is shown below. >> >> Please let me know is there anyother way we could acheive it? >> >> >> }else{ >> buf = build_res_buf_from_sip_res( relayed_msg, &res_len ); >> /* if we build a message from shmem, we need to remove >> via delete lumps which are now stirred in the shmem-ed >> structure >> */ >> if (branch!=relay) { >> free_via_clen_lump(&relayed_msg->add_rm); >> } >> /* update send_flags with possible additions from the >> reply route */ >> SND_FLAGS_OR(&uas_rb->dst.send_flags, &uas_rb->dst.send_flags, >> &relayed_msg->rpl_send_flags); >> /* Make the response to use the same IP where it receives >> the message */ >> * * >> * uas_rb->dst.send_flags.f |= SND_F_FORCE_SOCKET; * >> } >> >> Thanks >> JIjo >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com >> Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kathttp://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda >> >> > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com > Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kathttp://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda > >