Would db_mode 2 vs. 1 have any effect on this? My rep fields are still
non-zero, would posting my config even help?
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Nils Ohlmeier [mailto:lists@ohlmeier.org]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 8:49 PM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Cc: Matt Schulte; Jan Janak; Marian Dumitru
Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
The module was named replicator and the code was never public available
because the code was non-free. The documentation behind it can be found
in my
diploma thesis. As Jan already said it's history.
If you want to fix your running system just set all the replication
values in
your database to zero and restart your SER. Its very unlikely that these
values were changed by SER at any time.
Nils
On Saturday 26 March 2005 22:52, Matt Schulte wrote:
I see, so if I set the replication value to non-zero,
where would that
be done at? I didn't do it intentionally of
course. Are you suggesting
a config thing or more manual such as editing the
tables in the db?
What was the module name written by Nils? Was it included in any
versions of ser? Maybe I'm running this by accident, from what I can
tell though my config is pretty standard.Thanks much..
Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 2:06 PM
To: Marian Dumitru
Cc: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
There was another SER module written by Nils Ohlmeier that replicated
the user location contacts to a set of servers and kept the
replication state in usrloc. SER itself does not use the replication
flag and, as Marian said, you probably set the replicate flag to
non-zero value which is not correct.
Since you do not have the replication module, there is nothing that
would reset the flag and the contact stays in the user location
database forever.
The replication code was quite complex and it has been abandoned some
time ago. I plan to remove the zombie states and all related code to
make the usr location simpler.
Jan.
On 26-03 18:05, Marian Dumitru wrote:
> Matt,
>
> You get the message you mentioned "Keeping binding....." *only* if
> the contact is marked for replication. You can check this either in
> DB column replication, either into memory via "serctl ul show".
>
> As in code the replication flag is hardcoded to 0 (disabled), I
> would say you inserted via fifo some contacts with replication value
!= 0.
Or ???
> If so, I'm not sure if usrloc will ever remove the contact if the
> replication flag is still set.
>
> Best regards,
> Marian
>
> Matt Schulte wrote:
> >Thanks for the reponse, I gathered that much. My question is how
> >long
> >
> >before the contact gets "removed"? It's late morning now and
it's
> >still there :-)
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Marian Dumitru [mailto:marian.dumitru@voice-sistem.ro]
> >Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 5:37 AM
> >To: Matt Schulte
> >Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> >Subject: Re: [Serusers] usrloc and replication
> >
> >
> >Hi Matt,
> >
> >After expiration an before being removed, the contact are still
> >kept in ZOMBIE state - you can see the state in DB changes.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Marian
> >
> >Matt Schulte wrote:
> >>Ok, I'm using usrloc db_mode 2, I understand the timer checks
> >>every 60
> >>
> >>
> >>seconds default to see who should be expired and all. What I don't
>understand is why I keep getting these messages:
>
>Keeping binding '+13142664004','sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105' for
>replication
>
>This contact expired nonetheless and should be removed, is there
>something I'm missing?
>
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-----------
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
>----+
>
>| username | contact | expires
>
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-----------
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
>----+
>
>| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3105 | 2005-03-26
>
>00:42:35 |
>
>| +13142664004 | sip:s@69.29.57.253:3118 | 2005-03-26
>
>01:24:58 |
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+-----------
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
>+--------------+--------------------------------------+--
>----+
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers