21 May
2007
21 May
'07
5:30 p.m.
Hi!
For SIP capture please use "ngrep -W byline port 5060" which is much
more readable. (or post the .cap file to open it in wireshark)
IIRC xlite/eyebeam always puts the local socket into the Via header. But
this should be no problem as rport parameter is used.
Further, the Contact: header will be the public socket (learned by
rport/received from Viaheader of 200 Ok).
Thus, xlite does SIP NAT traversal for TCP itself.
regards
klaus
Alexander Bergolth wrote:
On 05/21/2007 03:15 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
Can you provide a full trace of the complete
X-Lite startup sequence
from the host where X-Lite is running? Maybe there's some STUN stuff
going on prior to the registration (don't know exactly how this works,
but it'll show up in the trace).
Stun-stuff is turned off and doesn't show up in the trace.
An x-lite trace and the corresponding wireshark output is available at
http://leo.kloburg.at/tmp/x-lite/
The source-port used by the tcp-connection is 2752, the Via-header
states 21744.
Cheers,
--leo
Alexander Bergolth wrote:
> On 05/18/2007 05:21 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
>> Alexander,
>>> I've noticed that (at least on my boxes) x-lite uses a different
>>> source-port for the sip-connection than the one that is announced in
>>> the
>>> Via-header. (See the example below.)
>> Are you sure there isn't any NAT or ALG in between? By default, x-lite
>> binds to local port 5060, but you've some non-standard ports in there.
>> So my guess is either a non-standard port setting in x-lite and NAT, or
>> a faulty ALG on the NAT device.
>>
>> Here's a trace using x-lite 2.0 r1105d (Linux):
>>
>> U 192.168.123.129:5060 -> <public IP>:5060
>> REGISTER sip:<some domain> SIP/2.0.
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.123.129:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4<snip>
> I did some further tests using X-Lite for Windows with interesting
> results:
>
> TCP enabled:
>
> - X-Lite binds to a source-port different from 5060 although 5060 is
> available according to netstat.
>
> - the port that shows up in the Via-header is different from the
> source-port that is used for the TCP-connection
>
> only UDP enabled on the server:
>
> - X-Lite binds to a source-port different from 5060 although 5060 is
> available according to netstat.
>
> - the port that shows up in the Via-header is the correct source-port
>
> - if there is a TCP-SRV record in DNS, it tries TCP first, falls back to
> UDP after 19 seconds but uses "Via: SIP/2.0/TCP" instead of "Via:
> SIP/2.0/UDP"
>
> I'll file a bug-report, let's see what happens...
>
> Cheers,
> --leo