Document and ser.cfg updated.
Ladislav
samuel wrote:
First of all, apologies Ladislav, I thought Greger was doing the document from the onsip times...and since the doc is not signed I just guessed.
I have debug at maximum so I can get all possible errors (9, which is more than the upper limit I think :P) I haven't time to test NAT staff but it seems that it might work...
About the rtpproxy socket, I just mentioned because if people find the document and start using it as config file there'll be a new top-10 question in the list: "rtpproxy does not work" because the socket is not the rtpproxy default socket.
Samuel.