21 Jul
2005
21 Jul
'05
5:45 p.m.
and are there any under the hood changes in openser, in terms of
performance etc
Iqbal
Lucas Aimaretto wrote:
HI there .... well, it seems that you went far beyond
than I did :)
I'm willing to try openser just for the sake of trying it. As I said,
I only installed it but have not configured it yet. Did you notice any
improvements with openser that ser did not provide ?
Now I'm running ser 0.9.0 ... I'm willing to try openser 0.9.5. The
change, is worth the trouble?
About mediaproxy, I said that Openser did not supported it, because I
did not see mediaproxy at the modules list of openser.
Regards,
Lucas
-----Mensaje original-----
*De:* Kanakatti M. Subramanya [mailto:mahesh@aptela.com]
*Enviado el:* Jueves, 21 de Julio de 2005 11:59 a.m.
*Para:* Lucas Aimaretto
*CC:* 'Iqbal'; serusers(a)iptel.org; users(a)openser.org
*Asunto:* Re: [Users] RE: [Serusers] openser /ser
Hmmm
We're running openser in production and its pretty darn stable (now)
Couple of things in no particular order
a) Openser does support mediaproxy, which is not surprising since
the first release is (basically) a repackaging of ser 0.9.3
b) The database structure has changed slightly. I spent some time
working on a migration script to move stuff. Basically, you have
two options
- Leave everything in the existing databases, and just modify
the tables appropriately (location and aliases need a new column.
look at the faq)
- set up the new databases using 'openser_mysql.sh', and
dump/restore your ser data into it (use mysqldump, and hand edit
the dump file. Note that you'll need to modify your ser.cfg to
point at the new stuff)
- ok, i lied. there is a third way. I regenerated all our
data using our provisioning scripts. it was a good opportunity to
sanitize/clean our data.
c) Openser will be keeping up with some of the more recent
developments - avpops, acc, uac, just to name a few. If you need
these, you really don't have much of a choice ;-)
d) Stability is an issue (for me, at least). I'd recommend
commenting out -DF_MALLOC and uncommenting -DDBG_QMALLOC in
Makefile.defs. It worked like a charm for me
cheers
Lucas Aimaretto wrote:
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.2/54 - Release Date:
21/07/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.2/54 - Release Date: 21/07/2005
I am
looking at upgrading soon, and am looking both at ser
and openser, without wanting to open a can of worms, what is
better, the features look pretty much the same, not sure if
there are any changes to the underlying code, in terms of
speed etc etc.
I like some of the features in the roadmap of ser, if anyone
has migrated from ser to openser, and has any pointers let me
know, would be nice to be able to go back and forth, between
them both, but I dont think openser cfg is compatible down to
some features.
I'm facing the same situation. Up to what I've seen, Openser does not
support the mediaproxy module. It has some nice features regarding NAT
with the use of the rtpproxy module. I have not upgraded yet, but I'll
give openser a try. By now, I only installed it, but have not yet
configured it. I'll tell you in a couple of days.
Regards,
Lucas