[Serusers] Re: [Serdev] New route graph utility

looks promising, so I wanted to give it try.... and hey, what is that pyhton? Is it your preferred misspell, so did you create symbolic link to python? :-D

Michal Nils Ohlmeier wrote: > Hello, > > in case you are not following the CVS commit log messages: I just checked > in a small python script which should be able to print a dependency graph > in ASCII of the route blocks of a SER config file. > > When you try to understand more complex configuration files this tool > might be helpfull. But be warned: this is still alpha code! > It will not eat your config file, but the output might not meet your > expectations :-) > > If you run it with the default configuration file the output will look > like this: > > ./route_graph.py ../../etc/ser.cfg > > Main > > \- 1 > > \- 1 > > \- 1 > > \- 1 > > A more complex scenario (from a config with named routes) could look like > this: > > ./route_graph.py ./ser.cfg > > Main > > \- ROUTE_RPC > > | \- ROUTE_ERROR_REPLY > > \- ROUTE_PROXYINIT > > | \- ROUTE_ERROR_REPLY > > \- ROUTE_INDIALOG > > | \- ROUTE_ERROR_REPLY > | > | \- ROUTE_ST > | > | \- ROUTE_FORWARD > | > | | \- ROUTE_LI > | | > | | \- ROUTE_RTPPROXY > | | > | | \- ROUTE_RR > > \- ROUTE_DOMAINPOLICY > > | \- ROUTE_ERROR_REPLY > > \- ROUTE_REGISTRAR > > | \- ROUTE_ERROR_REPLY > > \- ROUTE_AUTHENTICATION > > > [... omitted bigger parts...] > > Send routes > ----------- > > onsend > > Failure routes > -------------- > > FAILURE_ROUTE > > \- ROUTE_RTPPROXY > > \- ROUTE_VOICEMAIL > > | \- ROUTE_SEMS > | > | | \- ROUTE_LI > | | > | | \- ROUTE_RR > | > | \- ROUTE_ERROR_REPLY > > [... omitted bigger parts...] > > Onreply routes > -------------- > > REPLY_ROUTE > > > Feedback is welcome. Patches even more! :-) > > Greetings > Nils > _______________________________________________ > Serdev mailing list > Serdev(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev