On 19/07/17 08:31 AM, Ismir Saljic wrote: > Hello, > > I've issue with bridging media between IPv4 and IPv6 clients. > IPv4-IPv4 and IPv6-IPv6 calls are working without issues. > I'm using kamailio 4.4.2 and configuration according to: > http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:kamailio-mixed-ipv4-ipv6 > <http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:kamailio-mixed-ipv4-ipv6> > > SIP signalling is working without issues,but media addresses in SDP > are not rewritten correctly. > > The server is on amazon AWS and both kamailio and RTPengine are on the > same server. > RTPengine is running using these options: > > /usr/sbin/rtpengine --interface=privateIPv4!publicIPv4 > --interface=GlobalIPv6 > --listen-udp=127.0.0.1:22222 <http://127.0.0.1:22222> > --tos=184 > --pidfile=/var/run/rtpengine.pid > --log-level=6 > --log-facility=daemon I would suggest to use Kamailio's rtpengine module instead of rtpproxy, together with --listen-ng instead of --listen-udp. The UDP protocol of the rtpproxy module should work with rtpengine, but not many people are using it, so it's always possible that some bugs creep in. I'll look into it anyway, but in the long run, it's much preferable to switch to the rtpengine module. Cheers
##########################
Hello Richard,
thank you very much for your answer. I will try to use rtpengine module.
As I can see from logs, kamailio is sending correctly data to rtpengine but rtp engine
failed to parse IPv6 address from SDP body.
I'm sending flags to rtpengine according to the howto from link I've posted in the original post.
This is the part of the config:
if (!(isflagset(FLT_NATS) || isbflagset(FLB_NATB) || isbflagset(FLB_V4V6))) return; if(isbflagset(FLB_V4V6)) { if(af==INET6) { rtpproxy_manage("FAEI"); } else { rtpproxy_manage("FAIE"); } } else { if(af==INET6) { rtpproxy_manage("FAEE"); } else { rtpproxy_manage("FAII");
I'm not sure if I need to inform rtpengine that in SDP body will be IPv6 address.
Thanks
Ismir
I'm using kamailio 4.4.2 and configuration according to: http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:Hello,I've issue with bridging media between IPv4 and IPv6 clients. IPv4-IPv4 and IPv6-IPv6 calls are working without issues.kamailio-mixed-ipv4-ipv6 SIP signalling is working without issues,but media addresses in SDP are not rewritten correctly.The server is on amazon AWS and both kamailio and RTPengine are on the same server.RTPengine is running using these options:
/usr/sbin/rtpengine --interface=privateIPv4!publicIPv4
--interface=GlobalIPv6
--listen-udp=127.0.0.1:22222
--tos=184
--pidfile=/var/run/rtpengine.p id
--log-level=6
--log-facility=daemon In case of IPv4-IPv6 call, INVITE message contains correct IPv4 address but 200 OK response to the caller still contains IPv6 address of the callee in SDP body instead of IPv4 address of the server/RTPengine.This is the log during generation of the 200 OK response. Seems that RTPengine failed to parse IPv4 address from SDP body.
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:618]: parse_msg(): SIP Reply (status):
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:620]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0>
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:622]: parse_msg(): status: <200>
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:624]: parse_msg(): reason: <OK>
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK5afe.c59aef39af345458e 17940722ba0c70b.0>; state=6
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 234, <received> = <Server's GlobalIPv6>; state=6
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 236, <i> = <8>; state=16
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2642]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=5
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:496]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: Via found, flags=2
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: this is the first via
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:178]: receive_msg(): After parse_msg...
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1011]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=143 global id=142 T start=0xffffffffffffffff
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 234, <received> = <178.165.130.177>; state=6
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK.BUIgttWpK>; state=6
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1254]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 235, <rport> = <2066>; state=16
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2642]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=5
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:496]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: Via found, flags=62
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:509]: parse_headers(): parse_headers: this is the second via
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:172] : parse_to_param(): DEBUG: add_param: tag=2996330c
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:894] : parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=29
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:173]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [59]; uri=[sip:user@domain.com]
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:175]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: to body ["user"<sip:user@domain.com>]
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:153]: get_hdr_field(): get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <21> <INVITE>
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:888]: t_reply_matching(): DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 61349 label 0 branch 0
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:943]: t_reply_matching(): DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0x7f7f95c19a10)!
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:266]: run_trans_callbacks_internal() : DBG: trans=0x7f7f95c19a10, callback type 2, id 0 entered
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: acc [acc_logic.c:644]: tmcb_func(): acc callback called for t(0x7f7f95c19a10) event type 2, reply code 200
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1080]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=143 global id=143 T end=0x7f7f95c19a10
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:2160]: reply_received(): DEBUG: reply_received: org. status uas=180, uac[0]=180 local=0 is_invite=1)
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <script>: incoming reply
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <script>: BMX: FAIE
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:187]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=559
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp_helpr_funcs.c: 504]: extract_mediaip(): located IP address [IPv6 of the callee] in `o=' field
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp_helpr_funcs.c: 504]: extract_mediaip(): located IP address [IPv6 of the callee] in `c=' field
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:574]: parse_sdp_session(): ignoring unknown type in a= line: `a=rtcp-fb:* nack#015#012a=rtcp-fb:* nack pli#015#012'
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp.c:574]: parse_sdp_session(): ignoring unknown type in a= line: `a=rtcp-fb:* nack pli#015#012'
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: rtpproxy [rtpproxy_funcs.c:148]: check_content_type(): type <application/sdp> found valid
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:172] : parse_to_param(): DEBUG: add_param: tag=aNfQNJz3e
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:894] : parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=29
Jul 19 08:02:42 rtpengine[24330]: Got valid command from udp:127.0.0.1:28152: 1691_12 LAEI6 dcMDMrNRhw IPv6 of the callee 58100 aNfQNJz3e;1 2996330c;1
Jul 19 08:02:42 rtpengine[24330]: [dcMDMrNRhw] Failed to parse a media stream: /IPv6 of the callee:58100
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: rtpproxy [rtpproxy.c:2712]: force_rtp_proxy(): proxy reply: E8
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: ERROR: rtpproxy [rtpproxy.c:2735]: force_rtp_proxy(): incorrect port 0 in reply from rtp proxy
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1233]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=180, new_code=200
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1751]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2260]: generate_res_buf_from_sip_res( ): old size: 1467, new size: 1319
Jul 19 08:02:42 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2278]: generate_res_buf_from_sip_res( ): copied size: orig:164, new: 16, rest: 1303
msg=#012SIP/2.0 200 OK#015#012
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.152.108.46:56401;received=X.X.X.X;
branch=z9hG4bK.BUIgttWpK;rport=2066
Record-Route: <sip:[Server's IPv6];transport=tcp;r2=on;lr;nat=v46>
Record-Route: <sip:X.X.X.X;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr;nat=v46>
Contact: <sip:user@[IPv6 of the callee]:59335;rinstance=836aa36a01097072;transport=tcp>
To: "user"<sip:user@domain.com>;tag=2996330c
From: "caller" <sip:caller@domain.com>;tag=aNfQNJz3e
Call-ID: dcMDMrNRhw
CSeq: 21 INVITE
Allow: SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, INFO, OPTIONS, MESSAGE
Content-Type: application/sdp
Supported: replaces
User-Agent: Bria 5 release 5.0.0 stamp 85993
Content-Length: 559
v=0
o=- 241380314 3 IN IP6 IPv6 of the callee(should be IPv4 address of the server)
s=Bria 5 release 5.0.0 stamp 85993
c=IN IP6 IPv6 of the callee (should be IPv4 address of the server)The same situation is in case of IPv6-IPv4 call.This is the part of the log in case of IPV6-IPv4 call when kamailio is creating INVITE to the IPv4 callee:
Jul 19 08:04:52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <script>: BMX: FAIE
Jul 19 08:04:52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp_helpr_funcs.c: 504]: extract_mediaip(): located IP address [IPv6 Address] in `o=' field
Jul 19 08:04:52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/sdp/sdp_helpr_funcs.c: 504]: extract_mediaip(): located IP address [IPv6 Address] in `c=' field
Jul 19 08:04:52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: rtpproxy [rtpproxy_funcs.c:148]: check_content_type(): type <application/sdp> found valid
Jul 19 08:04:52 rtpengine[24330]: Got valid command from udp:127.0.0.1:28152: 1691_13 UAEI6 85993YWVkNmQ4YTFmN2JkZWQ4NjIzMGYwMDBlM2RlOGY0ZDQ 2a03:f81:abcd:172:16:20:119:2 50168 1430094e;1
Jul 19 08:04:52 rtpengine[24330]: [85993YWVkNmQ4YTFmN2JkZWQ4NjIzMGYwMDBlM2RlOGY0ZDQ] Creating new call
Jul 19 08:04:52 rtpengine[24330]: [85993YWVkNmQ4YTFmN2JkZWQ4NjIzMGYwMDBlM2RlOGY0ZDQ] Failed to parse a media stream: /IPv6:50168
Jul 19 08:04:52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: rtpproxy [rtpproxy.c:2712]: force_rtp_proxy(): proxy reply: E8
Jul 19 08:04:52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: ERROR: rtpproxy [rtpproxy.c:2735]: force_rtp_proxy(): incorrect port 0 in reply from rtp proxy
Jul 19 08:04:52 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1691]: DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:97]: has_totag(): no totag Any help would be very appreciated!Thank youKind regards