That's actially a good analogy, Greger... The pickup truck is powerful, able to be used for many applications, and once you own one, everyone suddenly wants you around when they need some work done, whereas the Porsche is built for speed, is cramped, can't carry much, and is too expensive for any practical people to ever really purchase. ;) Mind you, that being said, we do all our conferences in SEMS. It's actually a metric ton easier to set up for conferencing than Asterisk (WHY is it you need a Zaptel timing interface for audio mixing, again?), can support massively more users (especially if some are in listen-only mode), and 'Just works.' N. Greger V. Teigre wrote:Hm, I don't agree with that comparison ;-) Asterisk is a PBX, SEMS is a platform for specific applications. There are some common pre-developed applications that easily can be set up (like a conference bridge, play announcements etc). However, if you need a PBX with lots of features, you don't start with SEMS. I would rather compare Asterisk to a pick-up truck and SEMS to the Porsche. Use the truck for pretty much any work, but the Porsche is made for speed... :-) Using Asterisk as only a conference bridge and playing announcements is like using the pick-up truck to move your 12-piece china... g-) SIP wrote:Offers them? Yes. Offers them in a clean, friendly, usable package? Not so much yet. SEMS has raw capability, but if you want it to do many of the things Asterisk can do, you need to know how to code that yourself, or you're going to be digging about the code for documentation on features (since the current docs are not the world's greatest). Don't get me wrong, SEMS has its place, and is a constantly evolving work of art (we use SEMS for several things in our environment), but comparing SEMS to Asterisk is a bit like comparing a bunch of car parts to a Porsche. N. Fredrik Lundmark wrote:I'm still learning myself, but SEMS (iptel.org/sems) seems to offer many of the media- and/or b2bua-functions that Asterisk do. ///Fredrik ----- Original Message ----- From: "SIP" <sip@arcdiv.com> To: "Nhadie" <nhadie@tbgi.net.ph> Cc: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>; <serusers@lists.iptel.org> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 1:38 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] why combine ser with asteriskAsterisk is an excellent PBX system, and makes a very good endpoint in the SIP chain for all sorts of things -- IVR systems, voicemail applications, automated messages, etc. It has an extremely well-written CDR engine, so many people mesh it with billing applications to produce accurate accounting information. It also is fully aware of the media stream, which means it's capable of cutting off a call mid-stream, injecting audio into the call, etc, etc. Programming for Asterisk addons can be easily done in just about any language, and it meshes well with the overall structure. Programming for SER is... not so simple. As for running them both on the same box, the biggest problem would be resources. Unlike SER, Asterisk is not designed to be a carrier-grade SIP proxy. If you're actually proxying the media stream, you'd be hard-pressed to squeeze more than 150 simultaneous calls out of Asterisk on even the beefiest of hardware. Add SER to the same box, and you will quickly run into resource problems in medium-sized environments. It also doesn't have a lot of the SIP proxy functionality that SER has. If you're careful, you can configure Asterisk NOT to handle the media stream and still use it for prepaid solutions (using astcc or asterisk-b2bua), and this will save you bandwidth (but you'll still likely run into NAT issues that need to be dealt with somehow) and still let you use Asterisk as an in-between point. Together, Asterisk and SER make a very powerful combination for providing a full suite of services to clientele, and each plays well off the other's strengths. N. Nhadie wrote:Hi All, What's the advantage of combining ser with asterisk? I always see comments like using ser with asterisk is a very good solution etc. etc. the thing i liked with ser is that it does not do codec translation, which saves me cpu usage and also bandwidth. if i combine it with asterisk, would it not use codec translation? i also read that there is also a problem when ser and asterisk is run on the same machine, why is it so? if use prepaid billing solution for asterisk like astcc, would i then be able to provide prepaid service? soryy for asking too much, i'd just like to really understand it. Thank You in advanced. Regards, Nhadie _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers