Thanks Andrei and Jan for your answers.
I see that it is not easy to do this with SER. I wanted to do this with
headers to construct a header which indicates the user agent which Route
it should follow. I'll try to explain it better. The idea is based on
IMS standard. Proxies on the way add theirselves to a Path header. When
the response to a request come back to the UA, it takes the Path header
and creates a Route header dynamic(used at SIP Proxies which act as
loose router).
What I really want is use Route header in my UA to test loose router
function. Do you know any other way to do this?
Thanks.
Regards,
Curro
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 13:23, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Mar 08, 2004 at 11:51, Curro
<curro_dominguez(a)terra.es> wrote:
Hello
I would like to ask the list some questions about headers. I've been
reading the list and textops module, but I haven't found how to do this.
Imagine a scenario with 2 SER proxies. The first proxy adds a header
like:
Path: <....>
1 )How can the second proxy add a parameter to this header (and not a
new header)? The result that I'm looking for is something like:
Path: <....>,<....>
2 ) I know that SER can check whether a header is
present(is_present_hf()), but is it possible to extract the information
of a header and use it? I can't use search() function, because I don't
know the information, just the header name. I need to read some
parameters from a header of a SIP message to construct a new header.
You could try subst() from textops (it might be documented only in the
sgml in textops/doc). You have a special escape: \u which will expand to
the message uri, but if you want something else than the uri, you are
out of luck :-)
E.g.:
subst('/^(Path:.*)$/\1,uri=\u');
will add uri=<msg_uri> to your Path header.
Andrei
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org