Re: [SR-Users] Database errors with usrloc db_mode=1 and dmq_usrloc

Hello Joel, Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]: db_use_table(): invalid parameter value Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:670]: db_insert_ucontact(): sql use_table failed for: location So the table name seems to be ok - this function also log this error if the DB connection handle is not initialized. But still the question why this happens. Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/> From: sr-users &lt;sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org&gt; On Behalf Of Joel Serrano Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 8:10 PM To: Daniel-Constantin Mierla &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com&gt; Cc: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List &lt;sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org&gt; Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Database errors with usrloc db_mode=1 and dmq_usrloc Hello Daniel, I built from master and re-tested, debug log: Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:635]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:423]: usrloc_dmq_execute_action(): Received DMQ_UPDATE. Update contact info... Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:75]: add_contact(): aor: 1000107 Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:76]: add_contact(): ci->ruid: uloc-2-5e507d6a-1bd5-3 Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:77]: add_contact(): aorhash: 928379112 Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:115]: add_contact(): '1000107' Not found in usrloc Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:117]: add_contact(): Insert record Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: usrloc [ul_callback.h:83]: run_ul_callbacks(): contact=0x7f3a8cfdf170, callback type 1/15, id 0 entered Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:800]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Callback from usrloc with type=1 Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:826]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Contact received from DMQ... skip Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]: db_use_table(): invalid parameter value Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:670]: db_insert_ucontact(): sql use_table failed for: location Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: ERROR: usrloc [urecord.c:598]: insert_ucontact(): failed to insert in database Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:121]: add_contact(): Insert ucontact Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:124]: add_contact(): Release record Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:126]: add_contact(): Unlock udomain Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: sl [sl.c:305]: send_reply(): reply in stateless mode (sl) Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:161]: check_via_address(): (10.2.1.181, 10.2.1.181, 0) Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: dialog [dlg_cseq.c:116]: dlg_cseq_prepare_new_msg(): prepare new msg for cseq update operations Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:620]: parse_msg(): SIP Reply (status): Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:622]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:624]: parse_msg(): status: <200> Feb 24 13:58:46 csbc02 csbc[9280]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:626]: parse_msg(): reason: <OK> Thanks, Joel. On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 1:36 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com<mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello, the error message: Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]: db_use_table(): invalid parameter value Is printed if the database table name is not given as parameter (eg, null or empty). I pushed a patch to usrloc to print the table in the log message, can you try with latest master (or patch from next commit) and send again the log messages? * https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/3843ae18599bfc1806ccb62df44bbc8… Cheers, Daniel On 21.02.20 22:40, Joel Serrano wrote: Hello, I have a setup with 2 kamailio in active/idle, locations are shared via dmq_usrloc, but database is also used as a cache where other systems can access and query "real-time" data. The config we have is: # ----- usrloc params ----- modparam("usrloc", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1) modparam("usrloc", "db_load", 0) modparam("usrloc", "db_insert_update", 1) modparam("usrloc", "db_timer_clean", 1) modparam("usrloc", "server_id_filter", 1) modparam("usrloc", "timer_procs", 2) modparam("usrloc", "timer_interval", 60) # ----- dmq_usrloc params ----- modparam("dmq_usrloc", "enable", 1) modparam("dmq_usrloc", "sync", 1) modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_msg_contacts", 50) # 50 contacts / message modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_size", 10000) # 10000 contacts / batch modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_usleep", 500000) # one batch every 500ms With this setup, we assume: 1- almost real-time updated location info in the database. 2- as long as one of the two Kam is up, location information will not be lost (as they will sync with each other via DMQ) 3- if both servers go down, locations are lost (as they will not reload from database on startup). Our tests work well with the above config, with one exception, on the idle node, we see a lot of (only happens on the node receiving location via dmq): Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]: db_use_table(): invalid parameter value Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:1136]: db_update_ucontact_ruid(): sql use_table failed Feb 21 00:11:25 csbc02 csbc[13916]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:1657]: update_contact_db(): failed to update database I added debug logs to see if I could understand the reason: Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:478]: usrloc_dmq_handle_msg(): dmq message received from sip:usrloc@10.2.1.181:5050<http://sip:usrloc@10.2.1.181:5050> Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:423]: usrloc_dmq_execute_action(): Received DMQ_UPDATE. Update contact info... Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:75]: add_contact(): aor: 1063362 Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:76]: add_contact(): ci->ruid: uloc-1-5e502cd3-5629-1 Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:77]: add_contact(): aorhash: 928261667 Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:115]: add_contact(): '1063362' Not found in usrloc Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:117]: add_contact(): Insert record Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: usrloc [ul_callback.h:83]: run_ul_callbacks(): contact=0x7fe41ff41f40, callback type 1/15, id 0 entered Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:800]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Callback from usrloc with type=1 Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:826]: dmq_ul_cb_contact(): Contact received from DMQ... skip Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: ERROR: <core> [db.c:481]: db_use_table(): invalid parameter value Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:669]: db_insert_ucontact(): sql use_table failed Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: ERROR: usrloc [urecord.c:598]: insert_ucontact(): failed to insert in database Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:121]: add_contact(): Insert ucontact Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:124]: add_contact(): Release record Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: dmq_usrloc [usrloc_sync.c:126]: add_contact(): Unlock udomain Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: sl [sl.c:305]: send_reply(): reply in stateless mode (sl) Feb 21 14:38:34 csbc02 csbc[30796]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:161]: check_via_address(): (10.2.1.181, 10.2.1.181, 0) Can anyone help me understand what's the problem? I have the server_id setting, and the modparam server_id_filter, so shouldn't the receiving node just ignore any database tasks? Thanks, Joel. _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com> www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda> Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com> Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com<http://www.kamailioworld.com>