[Kamailio-Users] Using pua_bla for BLF
Hello I am trying to make some phones work with BLF using Kamailio and I found an older messge ( http://lists.kamailio.net/pipermail/users/2007-October/013700.html) saying that I could do this using BLA. I have a Thomson ST2030 as the message says, but it doesn't work with presence and pua_bla. I get the error: ERROR:presence:handle_subscribe: Missing or unsupported event header field value ERROR:presence:handle_subscribe: event= dialog I undestood from that message that the event is supposed to be 'dialog', so what's the problem then? Thanks a lot Catalina
El Wednesday 27 August 2008 17:25:27 catalina oancea escribió:
Hello
I am trying to make some phones work with BLF using Kamailio and I found an older messge ( http://lists.kamailio.net/pipermail/users/2007-October/013700.html) saying that I could do this using BLA.
As you can read in the last mail in that thread: http://lists.kamailio.net/pipermail/users/2007-October/013706.html ---------------------- how can be both BLA and BLF basically the same? In BLA is needed a subscriber-phone sending a REGISTER with "To:other-user", a SUBSCRIBE from "other-user" and from "subscriber-phone"... while in BLF is just needed a SUBSCRIBE "To: other-user" with "Event: dialog". ---------------------- So I'm prety sure that BLF and BLA have nothing in common. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc@in.ilimit.es
Hello, thanks for your answer I read that too, but somebody did say that it worked for them ( Steven C. Blair ) so maybe they did something to make it work and maybe they would like to tell us how they did it :) Thanks 2008/8/27 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@in.ilimit.es>
El Wednesday 27 August 2008 17:25:27 catalina oancea escribió:
Hello
I am trying to make some phones work with BLF using Kamailio and I found an older messge ( http://lists.kamailio.net/pipermail/users/2007-October/013700.html) saying that I could do this using BLA.
As you can read in the last mail in that thread: http://lists.kamailio.net/pipermail/users/2007-October/013706.html
---------------------- how can be both BLA and BLF basically the same?
In BLA is needed a subscriber-phone sending a REGISTER with "To:other-user", a SUBSCRIBE from "other-user" and from "subscriber-phone"... while in BLF is just needed a SUBSCRIBE "To: other-user" with "Event: dialog". ----------------------
So I'm prety sure that BLF and BLA have nothing in common.
-- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc@in.ilimit.es
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
El Wednesday 27 August 2008 17:44:00 catalina oancea escribió:
Hello, thanks for your answer
I read that too, but somebody did say that it worked for them ( Steven C. Blair ) so maybe they did something to make it work and maybe they would like to tell us how they did it :)
I'm waiting too that answer since 11 18:20:48 CEST 2007 :) -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc@in.ilimit.es
Yesterday I reviewed the source code. There are two different concepts. The biggest problem is the different namings (BLA, SLA, BLF, ...) which are used for all kind of concepts. BLA (ala Polycom): draft-anil-sipping-bla-03.txt Event: dialog;sla Content-Type: application/dialog-info+xml Dialog Event Package (ala SNOM, Linksys): RFC 4235 Event: dialog Content-Type: application/dialog-info+xml pua_bla implements BLA. Yesterday I discussed this on devel- with Juha. I came to the conclusion that we would could implement RFC 4235 using 2 new modules: - pua_dialoginfo: registers callbacks from dialog module and triggers PUBLISH - presence_dialoginfo: registers the Event: dialog in presence module regards klaus catalina oancea schrieb:
Hello, thanks for your answer
I read that too, but somebody did say that it worked for them ( Steven C. Blair ) so maybe they did something to make it work and maybe they would like to tell us how they did it :)
Thanks
2008/8/27 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@in.ilimit.es>
El Wednesday 27 August 2008 17:25:27 catalina oancea escribió:
Hello
I am trying to make some phones work with BLF using Kamailio and I found an older messge ( http://lists.kamailio.net/pipermail/users/2007-October/013700.html) saying that I could do this using BLA. As you can read in the last mail in that thread: http://lists.kamailio.net/pipermail/users/2007-October/013706.html
---------------------- how can be both BLA and BLF basically the same?
In BLA is needed a subscriber-phone sending a REGISTER with "To:other-user", a SUBSCRIBE from "other-user" and from "subscriber-phone"... while in BLF is just needed a SUBSCRIBE "To: other-user" with "Event: dialog". ----------------------
So I'm prety sure that BLF and BLA have nothing in common.
-- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc@in.ilimit.es
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
El Wednesday 27 August 2008 18:14:02 Klaus Darilion escribió:
Yesterday I reviewed the source code. There are two different concepts. The biggest problem is the different namings (BLA, SLA, BLF, ...) which are used for all kind of concepts.
BLA (ala Polycom): draft-anil-sipping-bla-03.txt Event: dialog;sla Content-Type: application/dialog-info+xml
Dialog Event Package (ala SNOM, Linksys): RFC 4235 Event: dialog Content-Type: application/dialog-info+xml
pua_bla implements BLA.
Yesterday I discussed this on devel- with Juha. I came to the conclusion that we would could implement RFC 4235 using 2 new modules: - pua_dialoginfo: registers callbacks from dialog module and triggers PUBLISH - presence_dialoginfo: registers the Event: dialog in presence module
Thanks a lot for the clarification. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc@in.ilimit.es
HI Klaus, That would be great! Thanks, Catalina 2008/8/27 Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at>:
Yesterday I reviewed the source code. There are two different concepts. The biggest problem is the different namings (BLA, SLA, BLF, ...) which are used for all kind of concepts.
BLA (ala Polycom): draft-anil-sipping-bla-03.txt Event: dialog;sla Content-Type: application/dialog-info+xml
Dialog Event Package (ala SNOM, Linksys): RFC 4235 Event: dialog Content-Type: application/dialog-info+xml
pua_bla implements BLA.
Yesterday I discussed this on devel- with Juha. I came to the conclusion that we would could implement RFC 4235 using 2 new modules: - pua_dialoginfo: registers callbacks from dialog module and triggers PUBLISH - presence_dialoginfo: registers the Event: dialog in presence module
regards klaus
catalina oancea schrieb:
Hello, thanks for your answer
I read that too, but somebody did say that it worked for them ( Steven C. Blair ) so maybe they did something to make it work and maybe they would like to tell us how they did it :)
Thanks
2008/8/27 Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@in.ilimit.es>
El Wednesday 27 August 2008 17:25:27 catalina oancea escribió:
Hello
I am trying to make some phones work with BLF using Kamailio and I found an older messge ( http://lists.kamailio.net/pipermail/users/2007-October/013700.html) saying that I could do this using BLA.
As you can read in the last mail in that thread: http://lists.kamailio.net/pipermail/users/2007-October/013706.html
---------------------- how can be both BLA and BLF basically the same?
In BLA is needed a subscriber-phone sending a REGISTER with "To:other-user", a SUBSCRIBE from "other-user" and from "subscriber-phone"... while in BLF is just needed a SUBSCRIBE "To: other-user" with "Event: dialog". ----------------------
So I'm prety sure that BLF and BLA have nothing in common.
-- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc@in.ilimit.es
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
participants (3)
-
catalina oancea -
Iñaki Baz Castillo -
Klaus Darilion