Online Devel Meeting - 2023-12-05
Note: the online meeting is planned to be hosted on a Matrix room. See more details below.
Date:
- Proposed: 15:00 UTC, Tuesday, Dec 05, 2023
- can attend: dcm, vseva, qxork, ...
- cannot attend:
Time of the meeting across the world:
- 16:00 - Berlin, Germany
- 15:00 - London, UK
- 10:00 - New York, USA
- 07:00 - Seattle, USA
Place:
- Matrix chat room: #kamailio:matrix.kamailio.dev
- https://riot.kamailio.dev/#/room/#kamailio:matrix.kamailio.dev
- To join as a guest (read only):
- go to: https://riot.kamailio.dev/#/welcome
- click on Room Directory
- then click on kamailio room to join it
Utilities:
- Time Converter
- Matrix resources
- website: https://matrix.org/
- it allows public registrations for getting a Matrix user account
- client applications: https://matrix.org/clients
- unofficial list of other public matrix servers: https://www.anchel.nl/matrix-publiclist/
Participants
Participation is open to anyone, just join the chat room if you want to participate.
People adding notes in the agenda using abbreviations:
- dcm - Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- vseva - Victor Seva
- qxork - Fred Posner
Agenda
Kamailio Development Status:
- summary and follow up on Dusseldorf devel meeting (dcm)
- open issues (dcm)
- minor releases for 5.6 and 5.7 branches (dcm)
- tracker issues review:
- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/
- summary of packaging and distributions
- summary of using github actions
Administration:
- servers maintenance
- community interaction and communication channels
- existing mailing lists review
Kamailio 5.8 (next major release):
- aim for 5.8 or 6.0
- roadmap
- features
- anything relevant that is missing?
- priorities
Documentation:
- updates for wiki with markdown and mkdocs (github markdown)
Collaborative Projects:
- unit testing, documentation, etc.
- community announcements
Transcript
time (-0500 EST) | matrix user | content |
---|---|---|
10:17:25 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | Sorry, still 5min |
10:24:24 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | ready to start |
10:24:36 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | sorry again for the delay! |
10:24:57 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | Hello everybody! |
10:25:31 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | a little bit of an agenda at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio-wiki/blob/main/docs/devel/irc-meetings/2023a.md |
10:27:42 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | hopefully those interested in the meetings are still around, so, the first topic would be the follow up after the Dusseldorf in-person meeting |
10:28:17 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | the most topic debated so far was about obsoleting a group of modules |
10:28:40 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | feedback on mailing list showed that some are still used |
10:29:29 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | so I am considering to split the group of proposed obsoleted modules in two, one to be very soon relocated to a dedicated repo, and another one that should be kept for a while, but with an explicit warning |
10:29:58 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | A warning for such that are still used is surely a good idea, e.g. for one release period |
10:30:00 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | that might even be something like don't start kamailio unless some (new) core parameter or modparam is set |
10:30:06 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | and then we could remove them |
10:30:12 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | also possible, strict warning :) |
10:31:18 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | not sure if we should keep the list of such modules in the core and check as core loads modules |
10:31:28 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | or have the code in each such module |
10:31:55 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | a warning in each module seems fine to me |
10:32:03 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | ok |
10:32:13 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | |
10:33:15 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | Trying to remember which modules these were... |
10:34:12 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | here is the email announcing them: https://kamailio.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/sr-users@lists.kamailio.org/message/56MTKAXALSMBPFCA4KRMUQPJXMU65XLV/ |
10:34:13 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | Found them |
10:35:01 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | there have been not much feedback on the list |
10:35:03 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | with the correction that uri_db was mistakenly added there |
10:35:12 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | |
10:35:17 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | |
10:35:32 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | * there have been not much feedback on the list - so its probably fine for the people |
10:36:36 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | ok, so we will follow up on mailing list on this topic |
10:37:01 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | the second one coming out of Dusseldorf was the introduction of github actions for some automatic management of issues and PRs |
10:37:30 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | that brought also some discussions, I think at this moment we are good with the process, having options to reopen such closed items |
10:37:57 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | initially we thought it was already possible, but proved not to be, luckily Victor found some solution |
10:38:20 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | there were some feedback of surprised users, it would be good next time when we change something like this to announce it before ;-) |
10:38:34 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | what could be done is tuning, for example the time lines, if someone thinks that it is too short 6 weeks to stale + 2 weeks to closing |
10:39:16 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | |
10:39:19 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | it was done in a let's try fashion, because time in Dusseldorf was only 2 days |
10:39:52 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | and they were not closed, it was first coming as a "reminder" that they were stale |
10:40:35 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | anyhow I am going to review and probably open several that I had in mind to investigate, but didn't find the time for |
10:41:07 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | remember that bug tag keeps them open |
10:41:12 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | Right now it's 42 days before stale, right? Seems fine |
10:41:18 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | I marked a few ones to work on it and re-open/keep open already |
10:41:22 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | we anyhow wrote in many feature requests that the might be closed after one month of so, but then nobody look over them again |
10:41:35 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | |
10:42:05 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | I think how the job is now works good... an improvement for sure. |
10:43:30 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | ok ... anyhow, this work flow can be tuned at any time, just make suggestions via tracker or mailing lists |
10:44:26 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | another topic that should be propagated to larger community was about the eventual need of making application shut down in two steps |
10:45:21 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | apparently there are crashes at shut down because some modules depend on the other and one can destroy its records but other ones may still need to access them |
10:46:20 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | to be like prepare-to-shutdown: when the module should write to db or other sync tasks, but still keep its records/structures in memory |
10:46:53 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | and 2nd step: simply destroy everything about caring of locks/mutexes, or others needing to access local records |
10:47:26 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | no change was done in Dusseldorf, this would require updates of the structures for module exports |
10:47:52 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | but it is good to be aware of and eventually report cases when such change would be useful |
10:48:20 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | it a good task to do at a future in-person meeting, if meanwhile is considered good to have |
10:48:28 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | shutdown gracefully |
10:48:56 | @werebear73:matrix.org | |
10:49:23 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | yes, it would imply some changes. Maybe a online meeting?? |
10:49:39 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | that's an option as well |
10:50:05 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | we should try to organize a kind of hands-on online meeting |
10:50:11 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | also from Dusseldorf: analyzing the impact of FLAVOUR that can be set in the Makefiles, now defaulting to kamailio, but can be also ser or sip-router, iirc |
10:50:33 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | my guess is that Juha uses a different flavour than the default one |
10:50:45 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | I wondered already a few times if we could not remove the FLAVOUR, maybe ask on the list if people are still using it |
10:50:56 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | the real question is if there is still different behaviour inside the code |
10:51:28 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | keeping the option to compile with different binary name could be fine, but if the behaviour changes, then we have to clean that somehow |
10:52:02 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | agree |
10:52:09 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | iirc, one of the reasons was that if $xyz is not found as pseudo-variable, then the flavour=ser would consider that an avp, like $avp(xyz) |
10:52:45 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | with flavour=kamailio, not finding $xyz should be considered an error |
10:53:32 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | but that was proposed during 2009-2010 merge, I haven't done this part of the merge and I am not sure how it ended up, as I using onli flavour=kamailio |
10:53:56 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | ok, so probably the first step is to ask on mailing list, as proposed above |
10:54:08 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | then see whre it leads based on feeback |
10:54:27 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | |
10:54:44 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | another discussion in Dusseldorf was about eventual alternative to the "makefiles", maybe cmake |
10:55:17 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | I think we discussed the topic in the past, like everyone would be ok to switch to something else if proves to be easier to maintain |
10:55:34 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | but nothing was coming out of the past discussions |
10:56:06 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | someone has to do the work and there's a lot of details in the Makefiles |
10:56:08 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | anyone, one conclusion was that maybe we should review supported gcc versions, because they make the makefiles quite big now |
10:56:20 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | as well as other compilers like suncc and icc |
10:56:38 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | this is a good idea to remove the really old gcc versions, like 2.9.x etc.. |
10:56:46 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | 3.x, 4.x |
10:56:58 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | for gcc, either remove the extremely old ones, or try to join those that set similar options |
10:57:26 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | yes, 2.x and 3.x could be good candidates for removing |
10:58:13 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | 4.x - I think there are some distro still using them, in the way that those distros might not be maintained, but people still run them |
10:58:24 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | centos 6?!? |
11:00:13 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | nex and probably last one from Dusseldorf, more for information ... |
11:00:36 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | the addition of pre-commit hooks that could help formatting the code, removing trailing whitespaces, etc ... |
11:00:48 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | if you missed the email about it, here it is: https://kamailio.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org/message/7PSVLEKOMSCDMUYN4VZLIO4ZBRBJXMF6/ |
11:01:04 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | same one was sent to sr-users |
11:02:07 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | hope it's helping |
11:02:43 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | you can always skip checks with SKIP=<name> too |
11:03:00 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | |
11:03:06 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | yes |
11:03:54 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | to conclude on Dusseldorf meeting, if I missed something relevant from there, anyone that participated just write the topic here |
11:04:50 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | ok, then next ... |
11:05:19 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | open issue, more from the perspective of someone here knowing about issues not reported yet (open on your side) |
11:05:51 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | from the reported ones, it seems there are cases of crashes when tls with libssl 3.x is used |
11:06:16 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | I'm having that TLS + openssl 3 issue in a customer right now :-( |
11:06:28 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | double free |
11:06:37 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | trying to investigate, but it's not easy as crashing happen at tls layer (e.g., encryption negotiation) |
11:08:18 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | because in some cases I noticed errors related to memory chunk tail overwritten, I thought there could be a buffer overflow, which might not be in the kamailio code, but in external libraries (like libmysqlclient or libcurl) |
11:08:21 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | tlsa didn't help |
11:08:51 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | I haven't looked at this libs to see if they reported such bugs for some of their older version that might be deployed on distros |
11:09:20 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | anyhow, I added a core parameter in kamailio (master) that will allow to specify extra size for each allocated chunk |
11:09:57 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | so at least one can protect in case off by 1-byte writes are discovered/reported in logs |
11:10:44 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | so if no other ones to report right now, we have to dive deeper in the one related to tls and libssl 3.x |
11:10:55 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | so next topic ... |
11:12:33 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | communication channels: I think we should move from mailing list forums, not to be the last ones using mailing lists ... ok this just a joke, as I saw some hot discussions on such topic in other projects ... |
11:13:20 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | but, as usual, if one wants to suggest new tools for making the interaction easier, simplify workflow, just do it at any time |
11:13:41 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | lifting load from administrative point of view is always good |
11:14:07 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | |
11:14:49 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | I think what we have now works... I don't know what the slack area is like though |
11:15:03 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | I also don't know if anyone still uses IRC |
11:15:05 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | I'm fine with what we got |
11:15:16 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | I'm connected to IRC... just silence there |
11:15:33 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | ok -- and yes, maybe we can remove references to irc on the website |
11:15:44 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | Great idea |
11:15:52 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | |
11:15:57 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | if they are still uses, they can stay as just community |
11:16:11 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | |
11:16:11 | @devopsec:matrix.org | i moved to matrix since irc was dead, no problems with matrix though |
11:16:50 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | I'm happy with matrix most days ;) |
11:16:51 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | then we can move on to releases |
11:17:18 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | (keeping a high pace, since I was late and some might have to leave early) |
11:17:34 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | minors from 5.6 and 5.7 were out pretty recently |
11:18:06 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | probably a new one from 5.7 will happen in a matter of weeks, for 5.6 sometime later |
11:18:09 | @marrold:matrix.org | |
11:18:31 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | for a major release, I am not sure yet when |
11:19:10 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | we could try a 5.8 in 2024 somehow earlier than usual, let's say to aim for march |
11:19:41 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | * we could try a 5.8 in 2024 somehow earlier than usual, let's say to aim for March |
11:20:02 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | 5.7.0 was in May this year |
11:20:09 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | that could be good if we want to go afterwards for a 6.0 with some major changes |
11:20:45 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | yes, we ended up releasing like May or June lately, like 1 year time frames in between |
11:20:52 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | |
11:22:05 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | probably we can decide at the begining of the next year, after the season holidays, maybe we can plan it better |
11:22:52 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | I'd love to move on to 6... but agree there should be something major for that change. |
11:23:03 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | |
11:23:59 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | ok, so let's leave it for mailing lists |
11:24:39 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | on server administration side I think we are ok ... is debian 11 still maintained? |
11:25:19 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | or we have some pressure to migrate to debian 12?!? |
11:25:31 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | no pressure yet I hope |
11:25:33 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | ;) |
11:26:00 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | July 2024 |
11:26:28 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | ok, still time |
11:26:42 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | Oh wait, thats 10 |
11:26:46 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | even longer =) |
11:26:55 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | June 2026 |
11:26:55 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | |
11:27:07 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | https://wiki.debian.org/LTS |
11:27:24 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | |
11:27:48 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | image.png |
11:28:34 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | no real rush but I would try to move to bookworm |
11:28:39 | @devopsec:matrix.org | just a side note, this tool this awesome for checking EOL dates, here is the debian entry https://endoflife.date/debian |
11:29:33 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | I think the hard part was already done migrating the mailman |
11:29:38 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | speaking of fun url's.... https://rtfm.tel/kamailio ;) |
11:30:27 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | yep, hopefully debian 11 to 12 is going to be easier than 10 to 11 |
11:30:40 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | I need to move kama3 to 11 |
11:30:57 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | removal of python2 brought some headaches with many apps, including unavailability of mailman2 |
11:31:30 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | next one then ... |
11:31:50 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | from the mailing list, when this meeting was announced, someone proposed about handling REFER, this being more like a feature request: while it may not require a full b2bua behaviour, it should need a new module to track sdps and parties involved in call ... so, as usual, some development. Personally I don't have a need for it |
11:32:36 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | otherwise I haven't spotted more proposals to discuss |
11:33:43 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | about the changes needed to isolate global variables in modules ... can you please provide an example of what you would like things to be? |
11:34:01 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | we could switch to C++ :D |
11:34:15 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | so I can later go module by module and do it |
11:35:48 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | it's how was done while porting some patches from an external (cloned) repository |
11:35:59 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | if you look at ims_qos module, it has now: |
11:36:32 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | ims_qos_params_t _imsqos_params = { .recv_mode = 0, .dlg_direction = DLG_MOBILE_REGISTER}; |
11:37:08 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | with: |
11:37:09 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | typedef struct ims_qos_params {int recv_mode;int dlg_direction;}ims_qos_params_t; |
11:37:36 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | for everybody else, this is actually also from in-person Dusseldorf meeting |
11:37:51 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | a discussion about how to avoid global variables conflicts |
11:38:23 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | because sometimes it happens different modules have same global variables for similar purposes, like the db_url |
11:38:33 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | ACK. I didn't noticed. Thanks! |
11:39:03 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | I will try to work on that on my spare time |
11:39:33 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | however, in some cases, because symbols are made globals when opening the .so files, they can conflict, the linker may find first the db_url global variable of another module ... |
11:39:52 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | the use of db_url is to give the example here |
11:41:05 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | one of the proposals in Dusseldorf was to create a structure to collect parameters and have one global variable for that structure with a name specific to the module |
11:41:25 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | so I took that approach when I ported some stuff for ims_qos module from an external repo |
11:41:51 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | usually we prefix the module name or a part of the module name as part of the variable, e.g. cr_db_url (carrierroute) etc.. |
11:42:45 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | for more context, I met the guy that wrote those patches at an event a few months ago and I said I could help to port them to our master branch, because they were done for 5.3.x |
11:43:16 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | yes, we prefix with the module name, that's ok, but some PRs come without |
11:43:58 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | maybe it would be better if the external contributors discover we use a structure for modparams and they add fields there |
11:44:13 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | anyhow, this was just a proposal, not something that must to be done |
11:44:37 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | it was considered good to use such approach in the future, for new params, ... |
11:44:58 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | of course, if one wants to do it for own modules, it's fine |
11:45:25 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | If we have it... people will just add new parameters the same way |
11:45:46 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | yes, that would be the scope |
11:46:34 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | My suggestion to use C++ was not completely meant as joke, this would help of course with this kind of global namespace issues. But of course it would be a serious change and we would need to really define the subset of C++ we want to use, otherwise its getting way to complex. |
11:47:15 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | and of course its a major effort in the end unfortunately |
11:47:40 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | So its probably not realistic |
11:47:58 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | I would prefer to use glib instead :-) |
11:48:46 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | something like boost would be of course great. No personal experience with glib from my side, though |
11:49:32 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | is glib on *BSD? if I am not wrong thinking g comes from GNU?!? |
11:50:33 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | LGPL-2.1-or-later |
11:51:03 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | is LGPL, so probably *BSD guys have nothing againt it, like they usually have against pure GPL software :-) |
11:51:39 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | anyhow, I am not familiar with as well, if found useful somewhere, it can be considered of course |
11:51:50 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | I think rtpengine uses it extensively ... |
11:52:32 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | https://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/current/pkgsrc/devel/glib2/index.html |
11:52:33 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | yes, its used from rtpengine |
11:52:45 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | as there are no major topics I can add here, everyone feel free to propose ... we can aproach in the order of posting ... |
11:53:35 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | it's like 1h30min since we started ... time flies quickly ... |
11:54:43 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | on packaging and docker, I think Victor wanted to merge some repos ... not sure if was sorted out somehow, whether is possible or note |
11:54:48 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | * on packaging and docker, I think Victor wanted to merge some repos ... not sure if was sorted out somehow, whether is possible or not |
11:55:20 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | iirc, one was used more by Sergey for rpms (?!?), the other one was more for debs |
11:56:41 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | also, on ci/cd, as it seems that github actions are powerful, if anyone is aware of some that could bring more magic to kamailio work flows, just suggest them here or on mailing list |
11:57:53 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | I did some work to keep what it was running... I've not response from Sergey |
11:58:09 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | ok |
11:58:44 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | anything else that one wants to discuss officially as part of the devel meeting (which means it can get in the transcript) |
11:58:46 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | * I did some work to keep what it was running... I've no response from Sergey |
11:59:32 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | if not, we can end the official devel meeting and start free discussions (not in transcript) |
12:00:01 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | Thanks to everyone |
12:00:18 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | Thanks all! |
12:00:36 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | Thank you all for all that you do. |
12:01:04 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | Once again sorry for keeping you waiting for me at the beginning, sometime a little snow and ice blocks Berlin at the end of working hours! |
12:01:25 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | then free discussions ... |
12:01:38 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | what's new and worth discussing from RTC space |
12:01:48 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | * what's new and worth discussing from RTC space?!? |
12:02:48 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | noticed some hot debates around Matrix changing the license and requiring CLA, ... Asterisk willing to close mailing lsits ... anything else that I missed? |
12:03:43 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | btw, FOSDEM 2024 has again an RTC devroom: https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/fosdem/2023q4/003518.html |
12:03:59 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | The matrix change should be fun ;) |
12:04:06 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | not sure I can go at this edition, I will try, but I don't know at this moment |
12:05:12 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | is matrix now AGPL? or what they changed to? I think I saw it but I forgot ... |
12:06:18 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | the new forks will use AGPLv3 |
12:06:33 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | with a contributor license agreement |
12:07:02 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | They still haven't described how/when forks will happen, so upgrading is still unknown. |
12:07:32 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | interesting development |
12:07:44 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | Matrix announcement |
12:09:16 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | we can go back to IRC if matrix derails :-) |
12:09:54 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | xmpp ;) |
12:11:23 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | regarding open source support, I've had some discussion about similar topics some weeks ago with the homer guys https://github.com/sipcapture/homer-ui/issues/627 |
12:12:32 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | unfortunately it seems not many companies support their open source development efforts |
12:13:57 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | they also looking more into moving to homer 10, which would be basically use grafana to do some of the infrastruture stuff |
12:15:06 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | is H 10 out? or work in progress (eta in such case)? |
12:15:15 | @fred:matrix.lod.com | This just reminded me how much I love SIPDUMP by the way |
12:16:25 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | - sipdump for tls is magnificent ... + sngrep |
12:19:28 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | I forgot about kamcmd => kamcli |
12:19:55 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | * I forgot about kamcmd/kamctl => kamcli |
12:19:56 | @henning:matrix.kamailio.dev | homer 10 is still in development |
12:20:00 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | that's something we discuseed at past editions, so I haven't put it back on table |
12:20:56 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | maybe we could "forget" old tools when starting a fresh 6.x series :-) |
12:21:07 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | |
12:21:39 | @vseva:matrix.kamailio.dev | I've to leave. See you! |
12:22:19 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | Thanks! Bye! |
12:22:58 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | Soon I'll have to hunt something for dinner as well ... |
12:24:43 | @miconda:matrix.kamailio.dev | I am going to check here from time to time in case something new pops up ... but I say bye now to those that are going to leave! |