THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
Henning Westerholt has taken ownership of the following task:
FS#23 - ldapsearch with empty filter
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=23
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#23 - ldapsearch with empty filter
User who did this - Henning Westerholt (henningw)
----------
Hey Andrey,
thank you for the patch. I applied it to the git master branch and will also backport it to the 3.0 branches after some time.
Regards,
Henning
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=23#comment26
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
forgotten to cc the list :-)
Klaus Darilion schrieb:
>
>
> Aymeric Moizard schrieb:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>
>>> Aymeric Moizard schrieb:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> Last general question: What about mixing kamailio & ser? I've seen
>>>> for example modules with same namings: "auth" and "auth_db" in both
>>>> modules_s & modules_k: does this means we can use the same core but
>>>> have to choose between using modules_s or modules_k?
>>>
>>> You can mix, but not arbitrarily. The biggest difference between ser
>>> and kamailio is the database structure. ser uses a new database
>>> schema with numeric user-ids which map to SIP AoR. kamailio still
>>> uses the old (ser 0.9.x) database schema where every user has a fixed
>>> AoR.
>>>
>>> Therefore you can not mix modules which require different database
>>> layouts.
>>>
>>> Thus, in your scenario you have to mix database layouts:
>>> provisioning/location from ser and presence from kamailio. That might
>>> work. But probably much easier would be to use kamailio modules only
>>> (unless you need numeric user ids).
>>
>> Then my first comment would be: why have the "pa" been removed if it's
>> not possible to use the presence module from kamailio...
>
> I think you can (I have not tried, but it should work, maybe needs some
> tuning) - as presence tables are not related to provisioning/location
> tables. But it is more work.
>
>> In my mind, presence & presence_xml are using different independant
>> database table and doesn't conflict with ser database?
>>
>> Most probably, there could be conflict with modules that depends
>> on usrloc for example? (like pua_usrloc) Looking at developper APIs,
>> for both usrloc kam/ser modules they are very close.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> I don't fully understand yet what "numeric user ids" are, but I would
>> really like to use the ser database layout for
>> user/location/credentials which seems really flexible compared to
>> kamailio.
>>
>> So where sip-router is going? Do you target to have only the same
>> core for both kamailio & ser, but still be different projects?
>
> There is already the same "core". But different database schema (used by
> modules)
>
>> Is having a common database layout an objective of the sip-router
>> project?
>
> I think this is not agreed yet. But as it is planned to merge common
> modules, this probably includes merging the schema too.
>
> The problem is existing schemas. Although ser's schema is more flexible,
> users avoid changing their existing schema (as this impacts the whole
> provisioning/billing subsystems).
>
>> If I intent to implement to additionnal event package, do you advise
>> me to stick with kamailio subscriber layout?
>
> Do you need subscriber layout for the presence module? Maybe you can
> describe your module a bit more.
>
>> I finally understood why my "make deb" was compiling a ser version:
>> I just forgot to checkout the kamailio branch... That was also a
>> source of confusion for understanding why normal step for the
>> kamailio branch was to setup a ser database layout... Because
>> of that error, I though first the same layout was already used...
>
> This is what I do to build kamailio:
> git clone ..uri...
> cd sip-router
> git branch --track kamailio_3.0 origin/kamailio_3.0
> git checkout kamailio_3.0
> make deb
>
> regards
> klaus
>
>
>>
>> Tks,
>> Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
>> amsip - http://www.antisip.com
>> osip2 - http://www.osip.org
>> eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
>>
>>
>>> regards
>>> klaus
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tks much for your help & advise,
>>>>
>>>> Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
>>>> amsip - http://www.antisip.com
>>>> osip2 - http://www.osip.org
>>>> eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sr-dev mailing list
>>>> sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>>>
>
Hi list,
I'm currently willing to install/upgrade to sip-router
(currently using kamailio 1.5)
I'm doing initial testing with git with kamailio branch
(3.0.0) and need some help.
I'm using a debian lenny and willing to have debian package
using "make deb".
First question: is it possible to include/exclude modules or
modules groups when using "made deb" or does it just compile 100% of modules?
What if I want to add my own module? which file should I update?
(only main Makefile?)
First pkg/kamailio/debian-lenny is broken: it failed when applying
patch. (it seems the patch are the ones that was applied to old
core version of kamailio)
I was able to do a "make deb" using pkg/debian but as I'm using
the kamailio branch, I want somebody to confirm this is the correct
way to go!
About TLS: it seems there are several way to have TLS: what is
the one used in "make deb"? The module solution?
I'm not able to use srcmd to add user or domain:
sercmd -s unixs:/tmp/sip-router_ctl user add aymeric_test secret amoizard(a)xxx.com
error: 500 - command add not found
when I use "ls" command, I don't see the user and domain command: do
I have to load any module for this?
I tried filling a "credential" and "domain" entry by hand in my database
but it seems to not work. specifically, I don't know what to put in the
did of "domain" and "credential" tables?
That's my initial questions...
Regards,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
Hi list,
I'm currently willing to install/upgrade to sip-router
(currently using kamailio 1.5)
I'm doing initial testing with git with kamailio branch
(3.0.0) and need some help.
I'm using a debian lenny and willing to have debian package
using "make deb".
First question: is it possible to include/exclude modules or
modules groups when using "made deb" or does it just compile 100% of
modules?
What if I want to add my own module? which file should I update?
(only main Makefile?)
First pkg/kamailio/debian-lenny is broken: it failed when applying
patch. (it seems the patch are the ones that was applied to old
core version of kamailio)
I was able to do a "make deb" using pkg/debian but as I'm using
the kamailio branch, I want somebody to confirm this is the correct
way to go!
About TLS: it seems there are several way to have TLS: what is
the one used in "make deb"? The module solution?
That's my initial questions...
Regards,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
http://phentermine.viviti.com/files/documents/buy-phentermine.htmlbuy phentermine online without prescription Phentermine Information from Taking phentermine together
http://phentermine.viviti.com/files/documents/buy-phentermine-online.htmlbuy phentermi
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: SER-447
URL: http://tracker.iptel.org/browse/SER-447
Project: SER
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.0
Environment: 64 bit CPU, Debian lenny OS
Assigned To: Vaclav Kubart
Fix For: 2.0, Ipteldorf
When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in
the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database):
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0)
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri:
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found
And here is ser.cfg:
xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n");
if (m_store ("0", ""))
{
xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n");
xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n");
if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted"))
{
xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n");
sl_reply_error();
}
}
the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging:
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, ))
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0)
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri:
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: offline message stored
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted)
May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE>
<sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl>
Below is the Message transaction sent through SER:
U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060
MESSAGE sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0.
CSeq: 64 MESSAGE.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport.
From: "Sen"
<sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl>;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e.
Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen.
To: "hulk@" <sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl>.
Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE.
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8.
Content-Length: 12.
Max-Forwards: 70.
.
test message
#
U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089
SIP/2.0 202 Accepted.
CSeq: 64 MESSAGE.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089.
From: "Sen"
<sip:sen@voip.rd.touk.pl>;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e.
Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e@sen.
To: "hulk@"
<sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl>;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05.
Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)).
Content-Length: 0.
Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5853
req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl
out_uri=sip:hulk@voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1".
.
In the attachment is a patch for the msilo.c source file where there was a need for two small corrections.
Cheers
Tomasz Zieleniewski
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tracker.iptel.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira