sr-dev April 2020

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

33 participants
420 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] db_redis: add support for native redis cluster (#1997)

by George Diamantopoulos

The db_redis module seems to only support connecting with a single redis instance. It is not evident from the documentation if it implements support for native redis cluster by honouring 'MOVED' replies. ndb_redis seems to have support for native redis clusters, and supports both automatic (see allow_dynamic_nodes parameter of ndb_redis) and manual configuration of redis nodes. Since both modules are based on the hiredis library, is it safe to assume this support could be easily implemented, with some code sharing between the two modules perhaps? If db_redis supports clusters with automatic configuration only (by processing MOVED replies), perhaps the module's documentation should be updated to reflect that. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1997

3 years, 2 months

[kamailio/kamailio] Wrong Record-Route and Via header fields when TCP is used (#2033)

by leonid-xorcom

### Description Kamailio server has two legs that are connected to different networks. I'm using Kamailio v.5.2.3 and the "enable_double_rr" is implicitly set to "1". The leg "A" IP address is 10.28.80.1 The leg "B" IP address is 192.168.9.103 The call is initiated from 10.28.80.47 According to the "rr" module documentation, function record_route() should insert two "Record_Route" header fields when a request is accepted on one leg is should go out via the second leg. This works as expected in case of UDP protocol: INVITE sip:2601@192.168.0.178:49162;transport=udp SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:192.168.9.103;r2=on;lr;did=e2c.a191> Record-Route: <sip:10.28.80.1;r2=on;lr;did=e2c.a191> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.9.103;branch=z9hG4bKcfa5.d64ecbd87d5315b5993c4ccf16f86537.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.28.80.47:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK3a9e9a4d But when the TCP protocol is used AND "listen" parameters are defined: listen=udp:10.28.80.1:5060 listen=tcp:10.28.80.1:5060 listen=udp:192.168.9.103:5060 listen=tcp:192.168.9.103:5060 then the outbound message looks like this: INVITE sip:2601@192.168.0.178:48758;transport=tcp SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:10.28.80.1;transport=tcp;lr;did=bcd.72f> Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.28.80.1;branch=z9hG4bKb9ca.26ea08654c9dbc32bb0dc6e3b6f92d45.0;i=3 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.28.80.47:5060;rport=33976;branch=z9hG4bK5291fab1 There are two problems there: a) only one Record-Route with leg "A" is inserted b) the added "Via" header field contains the leg "A" IP address instead of expected leg "B" IP address (192.168.9.103). In the LAN trace, I see that in reality the message was sent from leg "B". IMPORTANT: The problem occurs only when the "listen" parameters are defined in the Kamailio configuration. When the "listens" are not configured then everything works correctly. ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction #### Debugging Data #### Log Messages http://updates.xorcom.com/~xorcom/kam-tcp-problem.tar.gz The archive contains the following files: * syslog-bad.log and bad.cap - Kamailio log and tcpdump trace of a call when the problem occurs * syslog-good.log and good.cap - Kamailio log and tcpdump trace of a call when the problem doesn't occur #### SIP Traffic ### Possible Solutions ### Additional Information kamailio -v version: kamailio 5.2.3 (x86_64/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 7.3.0 ***Operating System**: Ubuntu 18.0.4 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2033

3 years, 6 months

[kamailio/kamailio] import_file - wildcard support (#2125)

by sergey-safarov

### Description Could you extend `import_file` directive to support wildcards like ``` import_file "/run/kamailio/cfg/*" ``` This will allow place runtime config files with public IP of VM. Useful for cloud installation. ``` listen=udp:eth0 advertise 52.24.72.57:5060 listen=tcp:eth0 advertise 52.24.72.57:5060 ``` ### Expected behavior All files matched to wildcard included into config #### Actual observed behavior wildcard ignored -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2125

3 years, 7 months

[kamailio/kamailio] lreproxy module (#2208)

by mojtabaesfandiari

lreproxy: add new lreproxy module   #### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [ ] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [ ] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [ ] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [ ] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description  You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208 -- Commit Summary -- * lreproxy module -- File Changes -- A src/modules/lreproxy/README.md (1) A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy.c (1976) A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy.h (120) A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy_funcs.c (460) A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy_funcs.h (41) A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy_hash.c (521) A src/modules/lreproxy/lreproxy_hash.h (70) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2208

3 years, 8 months

[kamailio/kamailio] Kamailio not retrieving custom or default socket when sending timed REGISTER messages (#2262)

by kdanderso

### Description When using Kamailio in a multi-homed configuration to register with another device using the uac module, it does not retrieve the custom or default socket information for timed registration attempts. It does, however, use the custom/default socket data for the initial registration. #### Reproduction The network is configured for two addresses: 10.9.9.121/24 and 10.9.7.121/24. Two floating IP addresses are also assigned (via Pacemaker/Corosync): 10.9.9.120/24 and 10.9.7.120/24. For testing, all addresses can be assigned permanently, so it is not necessary to have Pacemaker/Corosync installed. MySQL database has a user in the uacreg table with the socket column set to udp:10.9.7.120:5060. kamailio.cfg includes the following to enable sending of REGISTER messages: mhomed = 1 listen=udp:10.9.9.120 listen=udp:10.9.7.120 #!define DBURL "mysql://kamailio:kamailiorw@10.9.9.101/kamailio" modparam("rr", "append_fromtag", 1); modparam("uac", "reg_db_url", DBURL); modparam("uac", "reg_contact_addr", "10.9.7.120:5060"); modparam("uac", "reg_keep_callid", 1); modparam("uac", "default_socket", "udp:10.9.7.120:5060"); modparam("uac", "reg_timer_interval", 30); #### Log Messages The initial REGISTER outputs the following log data. The registration completes successfully. Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: uac [uac.c:407]: child_init(): run initial uac registration routine Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: uac [uac_reg.c:1172]: uac_reg_update(): using custom socket udp:10.9.7.120:5060 to send request Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:628]: grep_sock_info(): checking if host==us: 10==10 && [10.9.7.120] == [10.9.9.120] Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:635]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:628]: grep_sock_info(): checking if host==us: 10==10 && [10.9.7.120] == [10.9.7.120] Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:635]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: tm [uac.c:435]: t_uac_prepare(): next_hop=<sip:10.9.7.102> Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: tm [uac.c:158]: dlg2hash(): hashid 3846 Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: tm [uac.c:244]: t_run_local_req(): executing event_route[tm:local-request] Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg(): SIP Request: Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:612]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:614]: parse_msg(): uri: <sip:10.9.7.102> Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:616]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK60f.6fd7c907000000000000000000000000.0>; state=16 Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:2639]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=5 Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers(): Via found, flags=2 Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:500]: parse_headers(): this is the first via Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: exec: *** cfgtrace:local_route=[tm:local-request] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=229 a=26 n=xlog Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: <script>: In event_route(tm:local-request) Mar 24 19:09:27 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: tm [uac.c:664]: send_prepared_request_impl(): uac: 0x7268e184 branch: 0 to 10.9.7.102:5060 When the timer expires, the following is logged. Since the socket is not found, the registration fails: Mar 24 19:09:57 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: tm [uac.c:435]: t_uac_prepare(): next_hop=<sip:10.9.7.102> Mar 24 19:09:57 kam_test kamailio[8425]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:181]: get_out_socket(): no socket found Mar 24 19:09:57 kam_test kamailio[8425]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:10.9.7.102:5060) Mar 24 19:09:57 kam_test kamailio[8425]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:316]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket found for "10.9.7.102" af 2 (udp:10.9.7.102:5060) Mar 24 19:09:57 kam_test kamailio[8425]: ERROR: tm [uac.c:463]: t_uac_prepare(): no socket found Mar 24 19:09:57 kam_test kamailio[8425]: DEBUG: tm [h_table.c:132]: free_cell_helper(): freeing transaction 0x7268de10 from uac.c:604 Mar 24 19:09:57 kam_test kamailio[8425]: ERROR: uac [uac_reg.c:1196]: uac_reg_update(): failed to send request for [kamailioha] ### Additional Information version: kamailio 5.3.2 (arm6/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled on 17:22:05 Mar 18 2020 with gcc 8.3.0 * **Operating System**: Linux kam_test 4.19.75-v7+ #1270 SMP Tue Sep 24 18:45:11 BST 2019 armv7l GNU/Linux -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2262

3 years, 10 months

[kamailio/kamailio] core: main - Protect async-signal-unsafe code in sig_usr() with SIG_DEBUG (#2127)

by Guillem Jover

#### Pre-Submission Checklist - [ ] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [ ] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [ ] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist: - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [ ] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description The sig_usr() signal handler contains debug code to print memory usage and statistics that is not async-signal-safe, which can cause crashes or misbehavior. This code which only affects explicit SIGUSR1 signals on children processes, and is not guarded with the SIG_DEBUG macro. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2127 -- Commit Summary -- * core: main - Protect async-signal-unsafe code in sig_usr() with SIG_DEBUG -- File Changes -- M src/main.c (2) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2127.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2127.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2127

3 years, 11 months

[kamailio/kamailio] Expand the list of required default 3rd party libraries for Kamailio (#969)

by Olle E. Johansson

(from devmeeting #Fosdem) - adding new dependencies as core dependencies - Curl - libssl - uuid - libunistring - libxml2 Any other candidates? They have to be libraries that are commonly installed on most Linux/Unix system. This would mean that a lot of more modules will be built by default, like TLS, HTTP_CLIENT, WEBSOCKET. We may also look over the names of the packages/groups for the build system and linux distros -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/969

3 years, 11 months

[kamailio/kamailio] topos module seems to break re-SUBSCRIBE routing to downstream destinations (#1724)

by George Diamantopoulos

### Description Kamailio seems to fail to properly route in-dialog SUBSCRIBE with the topos module enabled. In this configuration, SUBSCRIBEs are expected to be delivered to a downstream UAS, an asterisk instance in the internal network. record_route() is executed for all initial requests, including SUBSCRIBEs. Routing is performed correctly with the topos module disabled, no other modifications were needed.  ### Troubleshooting I haven't been able to work around this issue in any other way other than disabling the topos module. #### Reproduction The configuration used is a heavily modified version of the example configuration file, but the handling of SUBSCRIBEs is generally simple. The initial SUBSCRIBE is subject to some tests, the R-URI is edited and dispatched to a farm of asterisk servers based on some criteria. Record Routing is enforced, so subsequent in-dialog re-SUBSCRIBEs are expected to be routed with loose_route(), which doesn't seem to handle things properly.  #### Debugging Data I'm attaching kamailio logs with debug=4, cfg_trace  #### Log Messages See attachments  #### SIP Traffic Please see: https://www.cloudshark.org/captures/d2643aae7f2a  ### Possible Solutions Using topoh instead for topos, but unfortunately this will break communication for other reasons (messages too large/UDP fragmentation for some peers). ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** Tried with kamailio 5.1.6 and kamailio 5.3.0-dev0 deb.kamailio.org repositories were used to acquire binaries for both versions * **Operating System**: Debian Stretch  [resubscribe.log](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/files/2586440/resubsc… -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1724

4 years

[kamailio/kamailio] uri_restore_rcv_alias() tried twice for local request (#2014)

by Alex Hermann

### Description While debugging an issue with locally generated in-dialog requests I stumbled upon some weirdness with the alias functionality from the nathelper module. The dialog modules tries to handle an alias parameter when sending an in-dialog request by calling ```uri_restore_rcv_alias()``` in the function ```build_dlg_t()```. A few instructions later, the same is attempted by the tm module in the function ```req_within()```. It seems to me that the attempt by the dialog module is redundant and can be removed. And while at it, IMHO it should be removed from the tm module too. This is functionality introduced by the nathelper module. Nowhere in the documentation it is mentioned there is some automatic handling of the alias parameter. If handling is needed for local requests, the script writer can call ```handle_uri_alias()``` from within local_route. If the functionality has to stay, may I suggest that the code in the nathelper module makes use of the ```uri_restore_rcv_alias()``` function instead of having its own duplicate implementation. Less maintenance, easier debugging. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2014

4 years

[kamailio/kamailio] rtpengine: stats for rtpengine command and reply from rtpengine (#1699)

by Surendra Tiwari

### Description rightnow, there is no stats about command sent to rtpengine and getting reply from rtpengine. There should be a stats that will tell that number of offer request sent: number of answer request sent: number of delete request sent: number of failed request for offer [after retry]: number of failed request for answer [after retry]: number of failed request for delete [after retry]: This will help to identify actual number of failed request.  ### Troubleshooting #### Reproduction  #### Debugging Data  ``` (paste your debugging data here) ``` #### Log Messages  ``` (paste your log messages here) ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` (paste your sip traffic here) ``` ### Possible Solutions  ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` (paste your output here) ``` * **Operating System**:  ``` (paste your output here) ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1699

4 years

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
42
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev April 2020