sr-dev January 2024

sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org

19 participants
311 discussions

[kamailio/kamailio] xhttp: fix execution of async functions (PR #3723)

by Vadim Saranov

#### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [x] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [x] Tested changes locally - [x] Related to issue #3720 #### Description Fixing R-RURI and adding necessary headers when creating fake_msg in xhttp_mod.c for successful message validation and the ability to perform various kamailio functions from event_route[xhttp:request]. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3723 -- Commit Summary -- * xhttp: fix execution of async functions -- File Changes -- M src/modules/xhttp/xhttp_mod.c (39) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3723.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3723.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3723 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3723(a)github.com>

8 months

[kamailio/kamailio] Docs: TLS module known limitation needs clarifications (Issue #3717)

by Thierno IB. BARRY

### Description We recently deployed successfully Kamailio with TLS certificates. Now we would like to use let's encrypt certificate which expire after 3 months. Means we need to renew certificate approximatively every 2 months. But while reading docs, in [known limitations](https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/tls.html#tls.k… it says : > TLS specific config reloading is not safe, so for now better don't use it, especially under heavy traffic. We struggle to understand if this behaviour is risky and not recommended under heavy traffic for certificate renewal. The doc has been added initially by @poandrei 18 years ago in Feb 21 2007 (see [commit](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/32e4977cdb9c1c9ca24c140…) While digging we came across few discussions Kamailio user groups which are saying "the opposite" (kind of): - [Comments by a co-founder of Kamailio ](https://www.mail-archive.com/sr-users@lists.kamailio.org/msg16014.html)stating that the old connections shouldn’t be affected by reload. - Comments by a Kamailio core developer stating that certificate reload is fine with the “reload” cmd ([link1](https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2022-February/114296.h…, [link2](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3305)) Plus in another section in docs: - [By definition :](https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/tls.html#tls.r.tls.reload) (the) existing active TLS connections are not terminated and they continue to use the old certificates. The new configuration will be used for new connections. So 18 years after, Is it safe to use `tls.reload` command in production and in heavy traffic for **TLS certificate renewal** ? Because it sounds scary and confusing. So the documentation as it is, really needs clarifications to let users know which risk they're taking when running the `tls.reload` command.  ### Expected behavior The document should clearly documents risks, at least for certificate renewal. #### Actual observed behavior Docs and Kamailio user/dev groups are confusing. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3717 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3717(a)github.com>

8 months, 1 week

[kamailio/kamailio] Dispatcher: added two new flags to mode parameter of ds_is_from_list function for more strictly matching (PR #3699)

by Dennis

#### Pre-Submission Checklist    - [ ] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide - [ ] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) - [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit) - [ ] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated) #### Type Of Change - [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality) #### Checklist:  - [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches - [ ] Tested changes locally - [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number) #### Description This PR adds 2 new flags to the mode parameter of the ds_is_from_list function. Some times the dispatcher configuration can look like this (route attribute is just for exampe, sockname is important here): 70 sip:192.168.1.1:5060;transport=udp 0 1 route=route1;sockname=udp_5060 71 sip:192.168.1.1:5060;transport=udp 0 1 route=route2;sockname=udp_5061 72 sip:192.168.1.1:5060;transport=udp 0 1 route=route3;sockname=udp_5062 73 sip:192.168.1.1:5060;transport=udp 0 1 route=route4;sockname=udp_5063 Here we have one host/port/protocol on the remote side and different ports that we are listening on, In stock dispatcher version ds_is_from_list(-1,0) will always match first available - 70, but this is not right for dst ports 5061-5063 (sockets in realality, because we can have different local ip on same port also). The new mode flag DS_MATCH_SOCKET (8) allow match for dispatcher socket also. Second flag is DS_MATCH_STRICTEST (16), it allow to match more strictness target in "address/protocol/port/socket" key, for example: 70 sip:192.168.1.1;transport=udp 0 1 route=route1 71 sip:192.168.1.1:5061;transport=udp 0 1 route=route2 72 sip:192.168.1.1:5062;transport=udp 0 1 route=route3 73 sip:192.168.1.1;transport=udp 0 1 route=route4;socket=udp:192.168.10.10:5063 if packet come from from any port of sip:192.168.1.1;transport=udp except 5061-5062 ds_is_from list will return 70, if received port also is 5063 the result will be 73, packets from ports 5061-5062 will be matched at 71-72 respectively. In stock version of ds_is_from_list the result will always be 70. Note, the DS_MATCH_STRICTEST method can be more compute intensive, because we can potentially traverse all the dispatcher tree. The behavior of existing flags are not changed. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3699 -- Commit Summary -- * dispatcher: added two new flags to mode parameter of ds_is_from_list function for more strictly matching -- File Changes -- M src/modules/dispatcher/dispatch.c (112) M src/modules/dispatcher/dispatch.h (2) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3699.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3699.diff -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3699 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3699(a)github.com>

8 months, 2 weeks

Roadmap to next major Kamailio release series v5.8.x

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, discussed a bit during the online Kamailio devel meeting, it is time to set the milestones towards the next major Kamailio release series v5.8.x. If no other suggestions that suit more developers, I would propose to freeze by end of this month or early February, then test for about 4 weeks as usual and release by end of February or during March. If anyone wants to add new features/modules, they have to be published till freezing date, either pushed in the git repository or proposed as pull request. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, February 20-22, 2024 -- asipto.com Kamailio World Conference, April 18-19, 2024, Berlin -- kamailioworld.com

8 months, 2 weeks

[kamailio/kamailio] secfilter.reload does not work for destination block list (Issue #3694)

by Ali

Hi When I add a destination to MySQL server to block and use kamcmd to reload, the call will not be blocked, while if I use kamcmd to add destination with `secfilter.add_dst` it works properly. It's considerable that after reloading if I print the blocked list in kamcmd (with `secfilter.print`) new database row will be printed correctly. my secfilter SQL table: +----+--------+------+------+ | id | action | type | data | +----+--------+------+------+ | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1111 | +----+--------+------+------+ kamailio 5.4.6 (x86_64/linux) Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3694 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3694(a)github.com>

8 months, 2 weeks

[kamailio/kamailio] uac_reg_unregister(attr, val) (Issue #3702)

by QWERTY

The uac module lacks the uac_reg_unregister(attr, val) method, Send REGISTER with expires 0 for matching record in real time, instead of through RPC command。uac_reg_disable(attr, val) ：SIP processing is done on the next timer routine. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3702 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3702(a)github.com>

8 months, 3 weeks

[kamailio/kamailio] Library libjson-c-dev 0.15.2 not compatible with pua_json module (Issue #3376)

by Henning Westerholt

There seems to be an incompatibility in the pua_json module related to the libjson-c-dev" version. The module crashes on startup on version 0.15.2 (e.g. from Debian bullseye). It works with version 0.12 (e.g. Debian buster). Backtrace below: ``` #0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50 #1 0x00007f6d265e5537 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79 #2 0x00007f6d265e540f in __assert_fail_base (fmt=0x7f6d2675d6a8 "%s%s%s:%u: %s%sAssertion `%s' failed.\n%n", assertion=0x7f6d2322c091 "jso->_ref_count > 0", file=0x7f6d2322c064 "./json_object.c", line=308, function=<optimized out>) at assert.c:92 #3 0x00007f6d265f4662 in __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x7f6d2322c091 "jso->_ref_count > 0", file=0x7f6d2322c064 "./json_object.c", line=308, function=0x7f6d2322c480 "json_object_put") at assert.c:101 #4 0x00007f6d23224732 in json_object_put () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjson-c.so.5 #5 0x00007f6d25842362 in pua_json_publish (msg=0x7fffb3fffb20, json=0x7f6d25ff5778 "{\"Call-ID\":\"111\",\"Event-Category\":\"presence\",\"Event-Name\":\"update\",\"Event-Package\":\"message-summary\",\"Expires\":\"3600\",\"To\":\"sip:103@XXX.YYY.55.208\",\"To-User\":\"103\",\"To-Realm\":\"XXX.YYY.55.208\",\"From\":\""...) at pua_json_publish.c:383 #6 0x00007f6d2583e74a in w_pua_json_publish (msg=0x7fffb3fffb20, p1pjson=0x7f6d25ff5988 "xW\377%m\177", p2=0x0) at pua_json_mod.c:100 #7 0x0000563199d1c47e in do_action () #8 0x0000563199d29ae6 in run_actions () #9 0x00007f6d2324444e in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/xhttp.so #10 0x00007f6d23246005 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/xhttp.so #11 0x0000563199e6cb10 in nonsip_msg_run_hooks () #12 0x0000563199ede538 in receive_msg () #13 0x0000563199cac4f2 in receive_tcp_msg () #14 0x0000563199caeb51 in tcp_read_req () #15 0x0000563199cb2028 in ?? () #16 0x0000563199c9da4f in ?? () #17 0x0000563199cb4f8c in tcp_receive_loop () #18 0x0000563199e2330b in tcp_init_children () #19 0x0000563199c8967f in main_loop () #20 0x0000563199c9446e in main () ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3376 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3376(a)github.com>

8 months, 3 weeks

[kamailio/kamailio] Module pipelimit add pl.reload RPC Command (Issue #3632)

by jerry

### Description Sometimes it is necessary to dynamically add current limiting rules without restarting kamailio. After adding pipe rules in the database, it is hoped that the new rules can be reloaded into memory through the rpc command. ### Expected behavior #### Actual observed behavior #### Debugging Data ``` (paste your debugging data here) ``` #### Log Messages  ``` (paste your log messages here) ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` (paste your sip traffic here) ``` ### Possible Solutions ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` version: kamailio 5.7.0 (x86_64/linux) f1e91d flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: f1e91d compiled on 14:56:02 May 17 2023 with gcc 4.8.5 ``` * **Operating System**: ``` Debian 9+, Ubuntu 16.04+, CentOS 7, ... ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3632 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3632(a)github.com>

9 months

[kamailio/kamailio] registrar: Consider changing default setting for case matching of username (Issue #3719)

by Morten Tryfoss

### Description I've recently spent some time debugging a case with JsSIP and usernames in form of a generated string which can be both upper and lower case letters plus digits. On BYE from callee to JsSIP, it responded with a "404" and "Request-URI does not point to us" in the console while debugging. JsSIP is using the Contact returned in the 200 OK to REGISTER (which is transformed to all lower case) for new outgoing INVITE. It does not match this against the one used in BYE correctly, and return "404". I see there is a setting in the registrar about this: ``` 3.11. case_sensitive (integer) If set to 1 then AOR comparison and also storing will be case sensitive, if set to 0 then AOR comparison and storing will be case insensitive. This is recommended. This parameter can be modified via Kamailio config framework. Default value is 0. ``` Since the RFC states that username should be handle case-sensitive, maybe it would be smart to change this default? ``` Comparison of the userinfo of SIP and SIPS URIs is case- sensitive. This includes userinfo containing passwords or formatted as telephone-subscribers. ... The URIs within each of the following sets are not equivalent: SIP:ALICE@AtLanTa.CoM;Transport=udp (different usernames) sip:alice@AtLanTa.CoM;Transport=UDP ``` #### Reproduction Make a registration with a username containing both upper and lower case characters. It will be stored in all lower case. ### Possible Solutions Change default value. Regardless of the outcome on this case - at least now there is a note about it here too. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3719 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3719(a)github.com>

9 months, 1 week

[kamailio/kamailio] new ims dialogue is not created (Issue #3676)

by deepak-git-account

### Description While doing a call, new dialogue is not created in PCSCF. RX feature is on. As per my understanding, ims_dialog has one call back function and it invokes dlg_onreq() function and a new dialgue can be created (function is dlg_new_dialog). And in the traces, that is not happening.  ### Troubleshooting I have added additional traces for troubleshooting, and I can see that in case of PCSCF, new dialog is not created. And later on Rx feature is not working as expected. #### Reproduction Everytime  Need to do Two UEs VoLTE registration and then a call from UE1 to UE2 #### Debugging Data  ``` (paste your debugging data here) ``` #### Log Messages  ``` (paste your log messages here) ``` #### SIP Traffic  ``` (paste your sip traffic here) ``` ### Possible Solutions  ![image](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/assets/64190746/9e41f486-61ad-4974-bd1c-b57a1602c57f) ### Additional Information * **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v` ``` (paste your output here) ``` root@openims-node-focal:/usr/local/etc/kamailio# kamailio -v version: kamailio 5.7.2 (x86_64/linux) 02958e flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 02958e compiled on 18:07:29 Oct 17 2023 with gcc 9.4.0 * **Operating System**: ubuntu uname -a Linux openims-node-focal 5.4.0-166-generic #183-Ubuntu SMP Mon Oct 2 11:28:33 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux  ``` (paste your output here) ``` -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3676 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3676(a)github.com>

9 months, 2 weeks

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

sr-dev January 2024