<!--
Kamailio Project uses GitHub Issues only for bugs in the code or feature requests. Please use this template only for bug reports.
If you have questions about using Kamailio or related to its configuration file, ask on sr-users mailing list:
* http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
If you have questions about developing extensions to Kamailio or its existing C code, ask on sr-dev mailing list:
* http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
Please try to fill this template as much as possible for any issue. It helps the developers to troubleshoot the issue.
If there is no content to be filled in a section, the entire section can be removed.
You can delete the comments from the template sections when filling.
You can delete next line and everything above before submitting (it is a comment).
-->
### Description
The reginfo notifications sent via pua_reginfo + presence_reginfo contains the version fixed to `0`.
The pua docs report the param `reginfo_increase_version` which should increase the version if enabled, but currently does nothing.
Looking into the code seems to confirm that, param is read from `pua` module but is not used anywhere. While the param `dlginfo_increase_version` seems to be used for the intended scope.
#### Reproduction
Setup pua + pua_reginfo to publish registration informations and observe that version param of reginfo is always 0, not respecting pua `reginfo_increase_version` setting.
### Additional Information
* **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v`
```
version: kamailio 5.6.1 (x86_64/linux)
flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: unknown
compiled with gcc 9.4.0
```
* **Operating System**:
```
Linux Debian bullseye/sid
```
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3234
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3234(a)github.com>
#### Pre-Submission Checklist
<!-- Go over all points below, and after creating the PR, tick all the checkboxes that apply -->
<!-- All points should be verified, otherwise, read the CONTRIBUTING guidelines from above-->
<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask on sr-dev mailing list -->
- [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide
- [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...)
- [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit)
- [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files
in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated)
#### Type Of Change
- [x] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)
#### Checklist:
<!-- Go over all points below, and after creating the PR, tick the checkboxes that apply -->
- [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches
- [ ] Tested changes locally
- [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number)
#### Description
After enabling the Topos module, we ran into a bit of trouble with early in-dialog notifies. We use the `event: talk` package from Cisco Broadsoft to be able to do call control, as described in chapter 6 here: https://pubhub.devnetcloud.com/media/broadsoft-docs/docs/pdf/BW-SIPAccessSi…
This will send a NOTIFY with a header `Event: talk` before the first `200 OK`. Currently this doesn't work with the topos module, since the NOTIFY method without a B-side contact will not check the INVITE record. When added to those methods in `tps_msg.c`, it tries to check the SUBSCRIBE for all NOTIFY's in `tps_storage.c`. The NOTIFY with `Event: talk` will follow on an INVITE, so there was a small change needed there.
I've limited it to just the NOTIFY's with the `Event: talk` header, to minimize any impact.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3627
-- Commit Summary --
* topos: add compatiblity for early in-dialog NOTIFY
-- File Changes --
M src/modules/topos/tps_msg.c (5)
M src/modules/topos/tps_storage.c (3)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3627.patchhttps://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3627.diff
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3627
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3627(a)github.com>
### Description
Request the RPM packaging of wolfSSL 5.6.6 for the upcoming freeze
### Expected behavior
I intend to bump the internal submodule to 5.6.6 and it would be good if Kamailio RPM packages could be updated.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3713
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3713(a)github.com>
version: kamailio 5.5.2 (arm6/linux) 55e232
raspberry pi 3b
I initially stated that I was running on 5.5.3 but I was mistaken. However I checked the 5.5.3 source and it appears to be the same.
I think that there is a bug in the tm module with respect to the "tm:local-response" event route. In the "t_reply.c" file, there is a static variable called '_tm_local_response_set_lookup'. This variable is initialized at load time to zero. It is checked in the '_reply_light()' routine and will initiate a local callback from the config script if "armed". The problem as I see it is that if the callback is readied, the variable is set to one. But it is never reset.
So the observed behavior is as follows. A REGISTER is received and the request_route arms the callback. The REGISTER requires an authorization (local database sqlite). After the 401 is sent back, the callback via the event route is called as expected. All good except that the event route script fragment is never executed again after the first call... ever, even if it's a new REGISTER request.
I would think that somewhere in the tm module, the variable should be reset to zero so that subsequent transactions can initiate the event route again. Or maybe the variable ought to live somewhere in the transaction cell???
. . .
t_on_reply ("MY_FRAG");
t_on_failure ("MY_FRAG");
. . .
event_route [tm:local-response] {
xlog ("L_NOTICE", IN tm:local-response\n");
my_function();
}
. . .
So 'my_function()' is only called once.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3064
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3064(a)github.com>
### Description
I have enabled `tcp_accept_haproxy=yes`, inbound TCP connection received on IPv6 kamailio socket but client real IP is IPv4.
When kamailio add `Record-Route` header then added IPv6 header and not added IPv4.
Example
```
INVITE sip:xxxx@example.com SIP/2.0
Record-Route: <sip:9sovfn2oP7ozLQID7BkFxBNt/CfE+wc=@[2600::6]:5060;r2=on;lr=on>
Record-Route: <sip:9sovfn2oP7ozLQID7BkFxBNt/CfE+wc=@[2600::6]:5060;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr=on>
```
From client perspective Kamailio make protocol conversion from the IPv4 to IPv6, and expected to see IPv4 in the IPv4 address in the received 'Record-Route' headers to use in the future requests.
Because client receiving IPv6 only and client does not have IPv6 address, then `ACK` message cannot be send to Kamailio.
### Expected behavior
Kamailio will use Kamailio server load balancer address to generate `Record-Route` headers.
Load balancer IP address can be received from the HAPROXY protocol.
#### Actual observed behavior
Kamailio use listeneer socket IP to generate `Record-Route` headers.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3666
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3666(a)github.com>
<!-- Kamailio Pull Request Template -->
<!--
IMPORTANT:
- for detailed contributing guidelines, read:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
- pull requests must be done to master branch, unless they are backports
of fixes from master branch to a stable branch
- backports to stable branches must be done with 'git cherry-pick -x ...'
- code is contributed under BSD for core and main components (tm, sl, auth, tls)
- code is contributed GPLv2 or a compatible license for the other components
- GPL code is contributed with OpenSSL licensing exception
-->
#### Pre-Submission Checklist
<!-- Go over all points below, and after creating the PR, tick all the checkboxes that apply -->
<!-- All points should be verified, otherwise, read the CONTRIBUTING guidelines from above-->
<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask on sr-dev mailing list -->
- [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide
- [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...)
- [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit)
- [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files
in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated)
#### Type Of Change
- [x] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)
#### Checklist:
<!-- Go over all points below, and after creating the PR, tick the checkboxes that apply -->
- [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches
- [x] Tested changes locally
- [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number)
#### Description
<!-- Describe your changes in detail -->
This PR fixes an issue regarding KEMI framework for onsend_route.
KSR.set_drop() in [ksr_onsend_route](https://www.kamailio.org/wikidocs/cookbooks/5.7.x/core/#o… does not make kamailio dropping the message when using kemi (python3) (probably holds true for other engines too):
This is exactly the example from [documentation](https://kamailio.org/docs/tutorials/devel/kamailio-kemi-fram…:
```
def ksr_onsend_route(self, msg):
KSR.set_drop()
exit()
```
The issue arises because we are not setting `ret = 0` when the drop flag is set, but instead check if it's not set to return `ret=1` (The case for native that returns `0` but no `DROP_R_F` was set).
**Note**:
KEMI Case: `ret = 1` always See [app_python3/apy_kemi.c](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/79697b4d5…
Native case: `ret` can be `0` for drop, or `1` for success
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3718
-- Commit Summary --
* core: Fix check to also work for KEMI framework
-- File Changes --
M src/core/onsend.c (13)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3718.patchhttps://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3718.diff
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3718
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3718(a)github.com>
Hello,
I propose to aim freezing the development for 5.8.x series at the end of
the 1st of February 2024 (Thursday).
New features that one wants to get in this release series have to be
pushed to git repository or pull requests made for them. Afterwards
usually follows a 4-6 weeks of testing till the first release 5.8.0.
Unfreezing will happen earlier, after the first weeks of testing when
the 5.8 branch will be created.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com)
twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, February 20-22, 2024 -- asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference, April 18-19, 2024, Berlin -- kamailioworld.com