<!--
Kamailio Project uses GitHub Issues only for bugs in the code or feature requests. Please use this template only for bug reports.
If you have questions about using Kamailio or related to its configuration file, ask on sr-users mailing list:
* https://lists.kamailio.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/sr-users.lists.kamailio…
If you have questions about developing extensions to Kamailio or its existing C code, ask on sr-dev mailing list:
* https://lists.kamailio.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/sr-dev.lists.kamailio.o…
Please try to fill this template as much as possible for any issue. It helps the developers to troubleshoot the issue.
Note that an issue report may be closed automatically after about 2 months
if there is no interest from developers or community users on pursuing it, being
considered expired. In such case, it can be reopened by writing a comment that includes
the token `/notexpired`. About two weeks before considered expired, the issue is
marked with the label `stale`, trying to notify the submitter and everyone else
that might be interested in it. To remove the label `stale`, write a comment that
includes the token `/notstale`. Also, any comment postpone the `expire` timeline,
being considered that there is interest in pursuing the issue.
If there is no content to be filled in a section, the entire section can be removed.
You can delete the comments from the template sections when filling.
You can delete next line and everything above before submitting (it is a comment).
-->
### Description
<!--
Explain what you did, what you expected to happen, and what actually happened.
-->
Hello, when I was testing the SMSC SMS business, I found that the SMS could not be forwarded by the SMSC when the characters were too long, approximately 117 characters. The issue was traced back to the smsops module, which has a limit on the length of the SMS, but it seems that it does not handle SMS segmentation. The error message returned is as follows. Could you please provide some suggestions and help?
### Troubleshooting
#### Reproduction
<!--
If the issue can be reproduced, describe how it can be done.
-->
#### Debugging Data
<!--
If you got a core dump, use gdb to extract troubleshooting data - full backtrace,
local variables and the list of the code at the issue location.
gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile
bt full
info locals
list
If you are familiar with gdb, feel free to attach more of what you consider to
be relevant.
-->
```
(paste your debugging data here)
```
#### Log Messages
```
2024-04-24T05:59:01.837950514Z 3(24) ERROR: <script>: SMS for "" (Valid: 0 )
2024-04-24T05:59:14.466167796Z 2(23) ERROR: <script>: 3GPP-SMS: MESSAGE (sip:+8618107550088@ims.mnc011.mcc460.3gppnetwork.org (172.22.0.20:6060) to tel:+8613800138000, bnecb4LQJ(a)10.46.2.1)
2024-04-24T05:59:14.466173859Z 2(23) ERROR: smsops [smsops_impl.c:1055]: decode_3gpp_sms(): Length of TP-User-Data payload exceeds maximum length!
2024-04-24T05:59:14.466175929Z 2(23) ERROR: smsops [smsops_impl.c:1320]: pv_get_sms(): Error getting/decoding RP-Data from request!
2024-04-24T05:59:14.466191554Z 2(23) ERROR: smsops [smsops_impl.c:1055]: decode_3gpp_sms(): Length of TP-User-Data payload exceeds maximum length!
2024-04-24T05:59:14.466194545Z 2(23) ERROR: smsops [smsops_impl.c:1320]: pv_get_sms(): Error getting/decoding RP-Data from request!
2024-04-24T05:59:14.466196517Z 2(23) ERROR: smsops [smsops_impl.c:1055]: decode_3gpp_sms(): Length of TP-User-Data payload exceeds maximum length!
2024-04-24T05:59:14.466198406Z 2(23) ERROR: smsops [smsops_impl.c:1320]: pv_get_sms(): Error getting/decoding RP-Data from request!
2024-04-24T05:59:14.466200311Z 2(23) ERROR: <script>: SMS for "" (Valid: )
2024-04-24T05:59:14.466255812Z 2(23) ERROR: smsops [smsops_impl.c:1055]: decode_3gpp_sms(): Length of TP-User-Data payload exceeds maximum length!
2024-04-24T05:59:14.466276249Z 2(23) ERROR: smsops [smsops_impl.c:1903]: isRPDATA(): Error getting/decoding RP-Data from request!
```
#### SIP Traffic
<!--
If the issue is exposed by processing specific SIP messages, grab them with ngrep or save in a pcap file, then add them next, or attach to issue, or provide a link to download them (e.g., to a pastebin site).
-->
```
```
![image](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/assets/152272255/808e65ce-9763-4056-9924-77122f6d9c25)
### Possible Solutions
<!--
If you found a solution or workaround for the issue, describe it. Ideally, provide a pull request with a fix.
-->
### Additional Information
* **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v`
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 4fb8ac -dirty
compiled on 03:11:49 Apr 24 2024 with gcc 9.4.0
```
version: kamailio 5.9.0-dev0 (x86_64/linux) 4fb8ac-dirty
flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
```
* **Operating System**:
<!--
Details about the operating system, the type: Linux (e.g.,: Debian 8.4, Ubuntu 16.04, CentOS 7.1, ...), MacOS, xBSD, Solaris, ...;
Kernel details (output of `lsb_release -a` and `uname -a`)
-->
```
Linux sder 4.15.0-128-generic #131-Ubuntu SMP Wed Dec 9 06:57:35 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
```
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3822
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3822(a)github.com>
#### Pre-Submission Checklist
- [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide
- [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...)
- [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit)
- [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files
in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated)
#### Type Of Change
- [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)
#### Checklist:
- [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches
- [ ] Tested changes locally
- [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number)
#### Description
Adding support for converting unsigned integers from database tables into kamailio pseudo variables usable in the routing config.
This is quite useful when pulling `int unsigned` fields from a database, in modules that support "extra fields" in their module parameters.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3828
-- Commit Summary --
* permissions: fixup uint support in address table reload
* htable: add uint support when packing an htable
* lib/srdb1: add uint support for db->pv conversions
-- File Changes --
M src/lib/srdb1/db_ut.c (4)
M src/modules/htable/ht_db.c (6)
M src/modules/permissions/address.c (35)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3828.patchhttps://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3828.diff
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3828
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3828(a)github.com>
Hi
there is an issue with the SIP parser for the t_uac_send function
https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_uac_send
If I call this function for example:
t_uac_send("INVITE", "sip:test@123.123.123.123:5060", "", "" ,"Content-Type: text/plain\r\nContact: <sip:85951b3d-096c-95d6-5f05-4f38095aca9f@172.17.64.120:5060;transport=tcp>;+u.sip!devicename.ccm.cisco.com=\"SEP5486BC7F2BBC\"", "Testbody")
Then the resulting request is broken - it's probably due to a character (exclamation mark?) in the Contact header.... I tested it with a call from kemi, but it probably also occurs when you run it with a normal kamailio -script tests
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3682
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3682(a)github.com>
Situation: Two Kamailio nodes syncing dialog profiles via DMQ
Observation: When a dialog timeout is encountered, about half of the time, the timeout is triggered on the peer node not handling the dialog preventing the call to be correctly terminated and also leaving entries in the dialog database which never get deleted.
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.7.x/modules/dialog.html#dialog.p.enable…
Makes clear, that only the node which is handling the dialog in question, can make changes not related to the dialog profiles. So when a dialog times out, it is this node which has to trigger the timeout, not any other one.
When looking at the source code, it is clear, that the 'lifetime' is transmitted via DMQ dialog message to the peer nodes, which in turn arm a timer. So it is obvious, this time will trigger, sometimes before the instance handling the dialog itself triggers that timer.
With some assistance of @oej I found a way to alter the JSON payload to extend the lifetime on the peer nodes:
```
route[DMQ_CAPTURE]
{
if(is_method("KDMQ"))
{
if(has_body("application/json") && $fU == 'dialog')
{
if (jansson_get("lifetime", $rb, "$var(lifetime)"))
{
$var(new_lifetime) = $var(lifetime) + 60; # Add 60 seconds on DMQ peer to make sure it expires AFTER main node.
$var(newrb) = $rb;
jansson_set("integer", "lifetime", $var(new_lifetime), "$var(newrb)");
set_body("$var(newrb)","application/json");
msg_apply_changes();
}
}
dmq_handle_message();
exit;
}
}
```
Testing with this config fixed the issue of the timeout firing on a peer node instead of the node handling the dialog.
Issue is present in 5.5, 5.6 and after looking at the code, I assume also on 5.7
-Benoît
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3656
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3656(a)github.com>
Hi,
I think there is an issue with writing CDRs on failover scenarios.
I have two servers with Kamailio. Both server running Debian 11 (bulleye) and latest Kamailio 5.6.1 from git.
I'm using DMQ to sync dialogs and htable between these servers, so both servers have the same knowledge of dialog state. Both Kamailio uses nobind option, so I can switch a VIP from one server to the other one. This is managed with keepalived. Switching the VIP from one server the other one works fine an while a call is running I can switch the VIP. I can see that the BYE Message is handled OK after I made a switch. I can see that acc is triggered but what is missing is acc_cdr in this case.
I'm using htable to fill all necessary variables to complete the CDR an I can see that all values are synced correctly.
The acc_cdr is created fine if there is no failover so i think it can't be an configuration issue.
Both server holds the same Kamailio configuration except the IP.
`version: kamailio 5.6.1 (x86_64/linux) bfc5c2-dirty
flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: bfc5c2 -dirty
compiled with gcc 10.2.1`
`root@voip-lab-proxy01:~# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Release: 11
Codename: bullseye`
`root@voip-lab-proxy01:~# lscpu
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
Address sizes: 38 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
CPU(s): 4
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 4
Socket(s): 1
NUMA node(s): 1
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
CPU family: 6
Model: 23
Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5420 @ 2.50GHz
Stepping: 10
CPU MHz: 2500.088
BogoMIPS: 5000.17
Virtualization: VT-x
Hypervisor vendor: KVM
Virtualization type: full
L1d cache: 128 KiB
L1i cache: 128 KiB
L2 cache: 16 MiB
L3 cache: 16 MiB
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-3
Vulnerability Itlb multihit: Not affected
Vulnerability L1tf: Mitigation; PTE Inversion; VMX EPT disabled
Vulnerability Mds: Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no microcode; SMT Host state unknown
Vulnerability Meltdown: Mitigation; PTI
Vulnerability Mmio stale data: Unknown: No mitigations
Vulnerability Retbleed: Not affected
Vulnerability Spec store bypass: Vulnerable
Vulnerability Spectre v1: Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
Vulnerability Spectre v2: Mitigation; Retpolines, STIBP disabled, RSB filling, PBRSB-eIBRS Not affected
Vulnerability Srbds: Not affected
Vulnerability Tsx async abort: Not affected
Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx pdpe1gb lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon rep_good nopl xtopology cpuid
tsc_known_freq pni vmx ssse3 cx16 pdcm sse4_1 x2apic tsc_deadline_timer xsave hypervisor lahf_lm cpuid_fault pti tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority vpid tsc_adjust arat arch_capabilit
ies`
If you need more information, please let me know. As I'm running this on a test system I can reproduce the issue at any time.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3254
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3254(a)github.com>
#### Pre-Submission Checklist
- [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide
- [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...)
- [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit)
- [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files
in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated)
#### Type Of Change
- [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)
#### Checklist:
- [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches
- [x] Tested changes locally
- [x] Related to issue #3667
#### Description
Allow creating Record-Route and Via header using destination address and port in the haproxy protocol header.
PR created behalf @ivanuschak
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3731
-- Commit Summary --
* core: extented haproxy protocol parser
* rr: extented haproxy protocol suppport
* path: extented haproxy protocol suppport
* websocket: extented haproxy protocol suppport
* siptrace: extented haproxy protocol suppport
-- File Changes --
M src/core/forward.h (4)
M src/core/msg_translator.c (137)
M src/core/parser/msg_parser.h (1)
M src/core/receive.c (6)
M src/core/receive.h (3)
M src/core/tcp_conn.h (1)
M src/core/tcp_main.c (22)
M src/core/tcp_read.c (20)
M src/modules/path/path.c (2)
M src/modules/rr/loose.c (4)
M src/modules/rr/record.c (6)
M src/modules/siptrace/siptrace.c (89)
M src/modules/websocket/ws_frame.c (9)
M src/modules/websocket/ws_handshake.c (3)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3731.patchhttps://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3731.diff
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3731
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3731(a)github.com>
<!-- Kamailio Pull Request Template -->
<!--
IMPORTANT:
- for detailed contributing guidelines, read:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
- pull requests must be done to master branch, unless they are backports
of fixes from master branch to a stable branch
- backports to stable branches must be done with 'git cherry-pick -x ...'
- code is contributed under BSD for core and main components (tm, sl, auth, tls)
- code is contributed GPLv2 or a compatible license for the other components
- GPL code is contributed with OpenSSL licensing exception
-->
#### Pre-Submission Checklist
<!-- Go over all points below, and after creating the PR, tick all the checkboxes that apply -->
<!-- All points should be verified, otherwise, read the CONTRIBUTING guidelines from above-->
<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask on sr-dev mailing list -->
- [X] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide
- [X] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...)
- [X] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit)
- [X] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files
in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated)
#### Type Of Change
- [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [X] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)
#### Checklist:
<!-- Go over all points below, and after creating the PR, tick the checkboxes that apply -->
- [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches
- [X] Tested changes locally
- [ ] Related to issue #XXXX (replace XXXX with an open issue number)
#### Description
Not for merging yet.
Package tls_wolfssl as an alternative to OpenSSL 3.x.
Depends on PR https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3590
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3592
-- Commit Summary --
* pkg: RPM packaging add kamailio-tls_wolfssl subpackage
-- File Changes --
M pkg/kamailio/obs/kamailio.spec (18)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3592.patchhttps://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3592.diff
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3592
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3592(a)github.com>
### Description
On systems with a high number of TCP sessions there can be a significant performance regression observed, probably related to the newly added TCP connection tracking feature.
### Troubleshooting
#### Reproduction
No special configuration is necessary, just install the latest 5.7.x release, e.g. 5.7.3 on a production system with a lot of clients connected over TCP or TLS. You need to have a large number of clients connected to be able to observe the regression. For a high number of connections (e.g. more then 20.000 up to 30.000 connections) the Kamailio servers uses about 30% to 50% more CPU as with the old version.
#### Debugging Data
Two graphs were attached to this issue. The first shows the CPU load before (less load) and after the upgrade (increased load). The second is a flamegraph that shows that over 80% of the CPU time is spent in the newly added function tcp_connection_limit_srcip().
<img width="372" alt="cpu-load-before-after" src="https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/assets/6481937/ec92c41b-25e2-4847-a4bc…">
![flamegraph](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/assets/6481937/5c2e3982-2d5b-4acd-a774-bad8fa64bd0a)
Most of the CPU time is spend in the TCP main process, as expected.
#### Log Messages
No special log messages could be observed.
#### SIP Traffic
### Possible Solutions
The TCP limit feature should probably be optimized to not cause such a large performance regression. It should be also possible to deactivate it completly and therefore getting a comparable performance as before the feature addition.
### Additional Information
Kamailio 5.7.3 and probably also git master version.
* **Operating System**:
Debian 11, Debian 12
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3759
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3759(a)github.com>