Hello,
I have noticed that the git tag for release 5.7.7 was missing, I've just set it.
The 5.7.7-bullseye docker image is also missing from https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio-docker/pkgs/container/kamailio
Not sure if this is done automatically, if not - please can somebody please trigger the workflow to create it?
Thank you,
Henning
<!-- Kamailio Pull Request Template -->
<!--
IMPORTANT:
- for detailed contributing guidelines, read:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
- pull requests must be done to master branch, unless they are backports
of fixes from master branch to a stable branch
- backports to stable branches must be done with 'git cherry-pick -x ...'
- code is contributed under BSD for core and main components (tm, sl, auth, tls)
- code is contributed GPLv2 or a compatible license for the other components
- GPL code is contributed with OpenSSL licensing exception
-->
#### Pre-Submission Checklist
<!-- Go over all points below, and after creating the PR, tick all the checkboxes that apply -->
<!-- All points should be verified, otherwise, read the CONTRIBUTING guidelines from above-->
<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask on sr-dev mailing list -->
- [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide
- [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...)
- [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit)
- [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files
in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated)
#### Type Of Change
- [ ] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)
#### Checklist:
<!-- Go over all points below, and after creating the PR, tick the checkboxes that apply -->
- [ ] PR should be backported to stable branches
- [x] Tested changes locally
- [x] Related to issue #4252
#### Description
This PR adds a new helper `reginfo_disable_publish` to `pua_reginfo` module which disabled the publishing for the current message, which is useful to control when to actually send it or not (eg in DMQ replication scenarios).
The helper is "negative" (it *disables* not enables) on purpose in order to mantain backward compatibility to current behaviour.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4253
-- Commit Summary --
* pua_reginfo: add helper to disable publishing for current message
-- File Changes --
M src/modules/pua_reginfo/pua_reginfo.c (4)
M src/modules/pua_reginfo/pua_reginfo.h (4)
M src/modules/pua_reginfo/usrloc_cb.c (21)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4253.patchhttps://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4253.diff
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/4253
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/4253(a)github.com>
henningw created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4209)
Frequent hangs in Kamailio probably related due to lock contention in xhttp_prom module.
### Environment:
The systems are using 32 Kamailio worker processes for the relevant network interface, Its also using Prometheus counter increment operations more than 30 times in the cfg during INVITE processing. The Kamailio uses otherwise no database or other IO related services. Kamailio version 5.8.3, but no relevant changes in the xhttp_prom module could be found.
### Quick summary of the findings:
Multiple systems showed frequent hangs in their Kamailio servers on a customer setup. It happens usually after a few hours that all Kamailio processes gets blocked, and no more traffic can be processed on the respective system.
I have analysed three stack traces of the Kamailio on one of the system that showed the behaviour. Two without problems and one that was created from during a period where the server had problems.
### Details:
Here some details of the stack traces from a problematic case.
The relevant processes are from PID 494551 to 494582.
The majority of all of these processes are blocked in paths related to the Prometheus module (PID 494551 to 494576):
#### PID 494551:
```
#1 0x00007fc69ea5f053 in futex_get (lock=0x7fc4a147acd0) at ../../core/mem/../futexlock.h:108
v = 2
i = 1024
#2 0x00007fc69ea70f99 in prom_counter_inc (s_name=0x7fffe339ffa0, number=1, l1=0x7fffe339ff90, l2=0x0, l3=0x0) at prom_metric.c:1154
p = 0x6b
__func__ = "prom_counter_inc"
[…]
#14 0x00000000005ab179 in receive_msg (buf=0x9f47e0 <buf> "INVITE [sip:+1YYYYYYY737@10.XXX.XXX107](sip:+1YYYYYYYYYY737@10.XXX.XX.107) SIP/2.0\r\nRecord-Route: [sip:10.1XXX.XXX.104;lr=on;ftag=HK507HSy55p9F;dlgcor=62b91.985c3](sip:10.XXX.XXX.104;lr=on;ftag=HK507HSy55p9F;dlgcor=62b91.985c3)\r\nRecord-Route: [sip:10.XXX.XXX.117;r2=on;lr;ftag=HK507HSy55p9F](sip:10.XXX.XXX.117;r2=on;lr;ftag=HK507HSy55p9F)\r\nRecord-R"..., len=2819, rcv_info=0x7fffe33a28d0) at core/receive.c:518
```
Most of the worker processes are in the same state as shown above.
Some of the processes are also working in other Prometheus related operations:
#### PID 494554:
```
#0 prom_metric_timeout_delete (p_m=0x7fc49ea102f0) at prom_metric.c:646
current = 0x7fc4a2810fd0
ts = 1744143945433
__func__ = "prom_metric_timeout_delete"
l = 0x7fc4abffc808
#1 0x00007fc69ea676ce in prom_metric_list_timeout_delete () at prom_metric.c:668
p = 0x7fc49ea102f0
```
### Problem hypothesis:
My hypothesis is that the hang is caused from lock contention around the Prometheus module. The relevant code uses only one lock, and this together with the extensive usage of the increment counters probably causes this issues under high load.
The majority of the worker processed are occupied in the Prometheus path and are not working on SIP packets. This will cause of course an increase of the UDP queue and the described problems.
In order to test this hypothesis we removed temporarily the Prometheus logic in the kamailio cfg and see if the issue still persists. The issue did not showed up again after two days of testing, when before it was observed after a few hours.
### Possible solutions:
The Prometheus module probably needs some improvements to support better high-load and concurrency situations. On common approach is to split the locks, e.g. using a per process lock array and then combining the individual values in a second pass when read from outside.
Alternatively the xhttp_prom module should be used only carefully in situations with a high concurrency setup.
I have the full backtrace available, if helpful just let me know.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4209
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4209(a)github.com>
linuxmaniac created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4235)
Finally I had the time and patience to address the last issues in our deb environment. Now build flow is by _distribution/architecture_ so errors doesn't interfere in a healthy _distribution/architecture_ combination.
> Follow up: same situation
>
> - **bookworm**: https://kamailio.sipwise.com/view/kamailiodev/job/kamailiodev-nightly-binar…
> ```
> /usr/bin/make every-module group_include="kerlang" quiet=verbose
> make[1]: Entering directory '/build/kamailio-6.1.0~dev1+bpo12.20250509084438.1'
> /usr/bin/make -C src/ every-module
> make[2]: Entering directory '/build/kamailio-6.1.0~dev1+bpo12.20250509084438.1/src'
> config.mak loaded
> Makefile.defs defs skipped
> Makefile.defs defs skipped
> qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segmentation fault) - core dumped
> Segmentation fault
> qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segmentation fault) - core dumped
> Segmentation fault
> Makefile:16: *** Not found Erlang. Stop.
> make[2]: *** [Makefile:509: modules] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/build/kamailio-6.1.0~dev1+bpo12.20250509084438.1/src'
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:34: every-module] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/kamailio-6.1.0~dev1+bpo12.20250509084438.1'
> make: *** [debian/rules:134: build_erlang] Error 2
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> ```
>
> - **bionic**: https://kamailio.sipwise.com/view/kamailiodev/job/kamailiodev-nightly-binar…
> ```
> gcc -shared -g -pthread -Wl,-O2 -Wl,-E -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro -rdynamic "-ldl" -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions tls_domain.o tls_init.o tls_verify.o tls_locking.o tls_select.o tls_dump_vf.o tls_bio.o tlsa_mod.o tls_server.o tls_rpc.o tls_ct_wrq.o tls_rand.o tls_util.o tls_cfg.o tls_config.o -lm /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libssl.a /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a -o tlsa.so
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(sha1-armv8.o): relocation R_AARCH64_PREL64 against symbol `OPENSSL_armcap_P' which may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(sha1-armv8.o): In function `sha1_block_armv8':
> (.text+0x1240): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(chacha-armv8.o): relocation R_AARCH64_PREL64 against symbol `OPENSSL_armcap_P' which may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(chacha-armv8.o):(.text+0x20): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(poly1305-armv8.o): relocation R_AARCH64_PREL64 against symbol `OPENSSL_armcap_P' which may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(poly1305-armv8.o): In function `poly1305_emit_neon':
> (.text+0x9a0): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(sha256-armv8.o): relocation R_AARCH64_PREL64 against symbol `OPENSSL_armcap_P' which may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(sha256-armv8.o): In function `sha256_block_data_order':
> (.text+0xf88): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(sha512-armv8.o): relocation R_AARCH64_PREL64 against symbol `OPENSSL_armcap_P' which may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(sha512-armv8.o): In function `sha512_block_data_order':
> (.text+0x10c8): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> ../../Makefile.rules:191: recipe for target 'tlsa.so' failed
> make[3]: *** [tlsa.so] Error 1
> ```
>
> - **focal**: https://kamailio.sipwise.com/view/kamailiodev/job/kamailiodev-nightly-binar…
> ```
> gcc -shared -g -pthread -Wl,-O2 -Wl,-E -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro -rdynamic "-ldl" -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions tls_domain.o tls_init.o tls_verify.o tls_locking.o tls_select.o tls_dump_vf.o tls_bio.o tlsa_mod.o tls_server.o tls_rpc.o tls_ct_wrq.o tls_rand.o tls_util.o tls_cfg.o tls_config.o -lm /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libssl.a /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a -o tlsa.so
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(sha1-armv8.o): relocation R_AARCH64_PREL64 against symbol `OPENSSL_armcap_P' which may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(sha1-armv8.o): in function `sha1_block_armv8':
> (.text+0x1240): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(chacha-armv8.o): relocation R_AARCH64_PREL64 against symbol `OPENSSL_armcap_P' which may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(chacha-armv8.o):(.text+0x20): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(poly1305-armv8.o): relocation R_AARCH64_PREL64 against symbol `OPENSSL_armcap_P' which may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(poly1305-armv8.o): in function `poly1305_emit_neon':
> (.text+0x9a0): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(sha256-armv8.o): relocation R_AARCH64_PREL64 against symbol `OPENSSL_armcap_P' which may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(sha256-armv8.o): in function `sha256_block_data_order':
> (.text+0xf88): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(sha512-armv8.o): relocation R_AARCH64_PREL64 against symbol `OPENSSL_armcap_P' which may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a(sha512-armv8.o): in function `sha512_block_data_order':
> (.text+0x1108): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> ```
>
_Originally posted by @linuxmaniac in [#13](https://github.com/sipwise/kamailio-deb-jenkins/issues/13#issuecomment-2866741862)_
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4235
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4235(a)github.com>
xadhoom created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4252)
### Description
A kamailio cluster which replicates presentities and usrloc via dmq may incur into duplicated presentities and notifications depending on config.
The problematic setup, where each kamailio node has the following setup:
- presence enabled with dmq
- usrloc distributed with dmq
- pua_reginfo used to publish reginfo to self
Really is multiplicated by the numbers of nodes, so 4 nodes -> 4 times notifications and presentities.
### Troubleshooting
The problem arise because pua_reginfo hooks to usrloc and every time a "save()" is done a publish is sent, which is by design. Then the handled publish generates a presentity which is replicated via dmq from presence module.
Now, if also usrloc is replicated via DMQ, the handling of such message still trigger the hook, causing another publish with generates a different presentiy, since is new and the e-tag is different.
This causes subscribers to receive <number of nodes> notifications on every status change.
### Possible Solutions
The approach can be to optionally disable that hook (basically making pua_reginfo skipping publish) when handling a message via DMQ, so the usrloc replica is just saved.
In other modules, like pua_dialoginfo or pua_usrloc this can be already done, since publishing can be controlled from script.
### Additional Information
* **Kamailio Version**
```
6.0.1
```
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4252
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4252(a)github.com>
QuincyGao created an issue (kamailio/kamailio#4189)
<!--
Kamailio Project uses GitHub Issues only for bugs in the code or feature requests. Please use this template only for bug reports.
If you have questions about using Kamailio or related to its configuration file, ask on sr-users mailing list:
* https://lists.kamailio.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/sr-users.lists.kamailio…
If you have questions about developing extensions to Kamailio or its existing C code, ask on sr-dev mailing list:
* https://lists.kamailio.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/sr-dev.lists.kamailio.o…
Please try to fill this template as much as possible for any issue. It helps the developers to troubleshoot the issue.
Note that an issue report may be closed automatically after about 2 months
if there is no interest from developers or community users on pursuing it, being
considered expired. In such case, it can be reopened by writing a comment that includes
the token `/notexpired`. About two weeks before considered expired, the issue is
marked with the label `stale`, trying to notify the submitter and everyone else
that might be interested in it. To remove the label `stale`, write a comment that
includes the token `/notstale`. Also, any comment postpone the `expire` timeline,
being considered that there is interest in pursuing the issue.
If there is no content to be filled in a section, the entire section can be removed.
You can delete the comments from the template sections when filling.
You can delete next line and everything above before submitting (it is a comment).
-->
### Description
<!--
Explain what you did, what you expected to happen, and what actually happened.
-->
I used dmq on two machines, registered two softphones on the 111 machine, and then used one phone to call another. After the call was connected, dmq sent a dialog message with an error message 400 bad request.
Here is the 111 config, 113 almost same to 111:
```
loadmodule "dmq.so"
modparam("dmq", "server_address", "sip:172.16.4.111:5464")
modparam("dmq", "server_socket", "udp:172.16.4.111:5464")
modparam("dmq", "notification_address", "sip:172.16.4.113:5464")
modparam("dmq", "notification_channel", "peers")
modparam("dmq", "num_workers", 4)
modparam("dmq", "ping_interval", 30)
loadmodule "dmq_usrloc.so"
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "enable", 1)
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "sync", 1)
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_msg_contacts", 50) # 50 contacts / message
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_size", 10000) # 10000 contacts / batch
modparam("dmq_usrloc", "batch_usleep", 500000)
loadmodule "dialog.so"
modparam("dialog", "enable_stats", 1)
modparam("dialog", "enable_dmq", 1)
...
if (is_method("INVITE")) {
setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting
dlg_manage();
}
```
Here is the sip:
<img width="836" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/df609e21-77bb-43e9-a8aa-112069a3…" />
the 113 log error:
```
dialog [dlg_dmq.c:127]: dlg_dmq_handle_msg(): no content length header found
```
### Troubleshooting
#### Reproduction
<!--
If the issue can be reproduced, describe how it can be done.
-->
The inevitable bug
#### Debugging Data
<!--
If you got a core dump, use gdb to extract troubleshooting data - full backtrace,
local variables and the list of the code at the issue location.
gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile
bt full
info locals
list
If you are familiar with gdb, feel free to attach more of what you consider to
be relevant.
-->
```
(paste your debugging data here)
```
#### Log Messages
<!--
Check the syslog file and if there are relevant log messages printed by Kamailio, add them next, or attach to issue, or provide a link to download them (e.g., to a pastebin site).
-->
```
113 log:
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/udp_server.c:708]: udp_rcv_loop(): received on udp socket: (106/100/767) [[KDMQ sip:dialog@172.16.4.113:5464 SIP/2.0 0D 0A Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.4.111:5464;branch=z9hG4bK28e.2ec7]]
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:190]: ksr_evrt_received(): event route core:msg-received not defined
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_fline.c:249]: parse_first_line(): first line type 1 (request) flags 1
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:722]: parse_msg(): SIP Request:
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:724]: parse_msg(): method: <KDMQ>
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:726]: parse_msg(): uri: <sip:dialog@172.16.4.113:5464>
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:728]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0>
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_hname2.c:316]: parse_sip_header_name(): parsed header name [Via] type 1
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1312]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK28e.2ec78467000000000000000000000000.0>; state=16
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:2663]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=5
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:592]: parse_headers(): Via found, flags=2
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:594]: parse_headers(): this is the first via
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_hname2.c:316]: parse_sip_header_name(): parsed header name [To] type 3
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:904]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=10
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:173]: get_hdr_field(): <To> [32]; uri=[sip:dialog@172.16.4.113:5464]
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:176]: get_hdr_field(): to body (32)[<sip:dialog@172.16.4.113:5464>
], to tag (0)[]
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_hname2.c:316]: parse_sip_header_name(): parsed header name [From] type 4
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_hname2.c:316]: parse_sip_header_name(): parsed header name [CSeq] type 5
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:154]: get_hdr_field(): cseq <CSeq>: <10> <KDMQ>
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_hname2.c:316]: parse_sip_header_name(): parsed header name [Call-ID] type 6
22(4389) DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:397]: receive_msg(): --- received sip message - request - call-id: [6ecc0d71033645ea-1972(a)172.16.4.111] - cseq: [10 KDMQ]
22(4389) DEBUG: |25-03-26 15:25:01|6ecc0d71033645ea-1972@172.16.4.111| <core> [core/receive.c:263]: ksr_evrt_pre_routing(): event route core:pre-routing not defined
22(4389) DEBUG: |25-03-26 15:25:01|6ecc0d71033645ea-1972@172.16.4.111| <core> [core/receive.c:474]: receive_msg(): preparing to run routing scripts...
22(4389) exec: |25-03-26 15:25:01|6ecc0d71033645ea-1972@172.16.4.111| *** cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/usr/local/bin/../etc/kamailio/conf/kamailio.cfg] l=584 a=26 n=xlog
22(4389) INFO: |25-03-26 15:25:01|6ecc0d71033645ea-1972@172.16.4.111| <script>: 172.16.4.111:5464|172.16.4.113:5464|udp|KDMQ
22(4389) exec: |25-03-26 15:25:01|6ecc0d71033645ea-1972@172.16.4.111| *** cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/usr/local/bin/../etc/kamailio/conf/kamailio.cfg] l=592 a=16 n=if
22(4389) exec: |25-03-26 15:25:01|6ecc0d71033645ea-1972@172.16.4.111| *** cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/usr/local/bin/../etc/kamailio/conf/kamailio.cfg] l=589 a=25 n=is_method
22(4389) exec: |25-03-26 15:25:01|6ecc0d71033645ea-1972@172.16.4.111| *** cfgtrace:dbg_cfg_trace(): request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/usr/local/bin/../etc/kamailio/conf/kamailio.cfg] l=590 a=24 n=dmq_process_message
22(4389) DEBUG: |25-03-26 15:25:01|6ecc0d71033645ea-1972@172.16.4.111| dmq [message.c:154]: ki_dmq_process_message_rc(): dmq_handle_message [KDMQ sip:dialog@172.16.4.113:5464]
22(4389) DEBUG: |25-03-26 15:25:01|6ecc0d71033645ea-1972@172.16.4.111| dmq [message.c:168]: ki_dmq_process_message_rc(): dmq_handle_message peer found: dialog
22(4389) DEBUG: |25-03-26 15:25:01|6ecc0d71033645ea-1972@172.16.4.111| <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:185]: parse_to_param(): add param: tag=6c399121368d030ed41b62758342ea91-0405b528
22(4389) DEBUG: |25-03-26 15:25:01|6ecc0d71033645ea-1972@172.16.4.111| <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:904]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=29
22(4389) DEBUG: |25-03-26 15:25:01|6ecc0d71033645ea-1972@172.16.4.111| dialog [dlg_dmq.c:124]: dlg_dmq_handle_msg(): dmq message received
22(4389) ERROR: |25-03-26 15:25:01|6ecc0d71033645ea-1972@172.16.4.111| dialog [dlg_dmq.c:127]: dlg_dmq_handle_msg(): no content length header found
```
#### SIP Traffic
<!--
If the issue is exposed by processing specific SIP messages, grab them with ngrep or save in a pcap file, then add them next, or attach to issue, or provide a link to download them (e.g., to a pastebin site).
-->
```
(paste your sip traffic here)
```
### Possible Solutions
<!--
If you found a solution or workaround for the issue, describe it. Ideally, provide a pull request with a fix.
-->
### Additional Information
* **Kamailio Version** - output of `kamailio -v`
```
version: kamailio 5.8.5 (x86_64/linux)
flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id:
compiled on 11:27:01 Mar 21 2025 with gcc 4.8.5
```
* **Operating System**:
<!--
Details about the operating system, the type: Linux (e.g.,: Debian 8.4, Ubuntu 16.04, CentOS 7.1, ...), MacOS, xBSD, Solaris, ...;
Kernel details (output of `lsb_release -a` and `uname -a`)
-->
```
centos7.9
```
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4189
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4189(a)github.com>