14 Sep
2013
14 Sep
'13
9:19 p.m.
Yes, you are right...thank you :)
I guess my reasoning only applies if using shared table, no replication and
therefore always adding path.
Charles
On 14 Sep 2013 19:32, "Juha Heinanen" <jh(a)tutpro.com> wrote:
Charles Chance writes:
--
www.sipcentric.com
Follow us on twitter @sipcentric <http://twitter.com/sipcentric>
Sipcentric Ltd. Company registered in England & Wales no. 7365592. Registered
office: Unit 10 iBIC, Birmingham Science Park, Holt Court South, Birmingham
B7 4EJ.
Yes, we could use a separate table for each
registrar and replicate
registrations to all of them. But we still need to add Path to ensure
invites etc go via the server each client used to register (due to client
NAT). And if that is local to the lookup, it still makes sense to ignore
the path as it is itself.
load_contacts() automatically prioritizes contacts so that one without
path has higher priority. so, no changes are needed to current code.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev