Yes, you are right...thank you :)
I guess my reasoning only applies if using shared table, no replication and therefore always adding path.
Charles On 14 Sep 2013 19:32, "Juha Heinanen" jh@tutpro.com wrote:
Charles Chance writes:
Yes, we could use a separate table for each registrar and replicate registrations to all of them. But we still need to add Path to ensure invites etc go via the server each client used to register (due to client NAT). And if that is local to the lookup, it still makes sense to ignore the path as it is itself.
load_contacts() automatically prioritizes contacts so that one without path has higher priority. so, no changes are needed to current code.
-- juha
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev