Frederico, the problem is that the code is already in ..... there could be other ppl using it, so I think it would be unfair to just remove it. We have 2 solutions here:
1. move to a modparam. 2. move it to a vendor-specific AVP
Finally, we will need to find someone who has time/priority to get this done... if you are worried only about the std, then I think it's a low priority. If it's affecting your ability to use Kamailio, then it's of course higher priority.
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 at 14:34 Federico Favaro notifications@github.com wrote:
Sorry if i insist on the point...but really i do not see the point in leaving such AVP. To me is sufficient a feedback like "Our HSS is caring about this AVP, because we have a custom HSS that....etc...etc". I will close the PR or add a modparam and that's ok. This way we can for sure have a fallback, but basically we are mantaining an "out-of-standard" thing (that, btw, even wireshark doesn't decode) without knowing if it is really needed or not.
Anyway, copy that, with low priority i will try to find some time to add a modparam if really needed
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/659#issuecomment-228334020, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ABI0d_gufKE3DAJL36sFWo9tepQP1C0Qks5qO85EgaJpZM4Iu6pk .
--- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/659#issuecomment-228335790