sr-users October 2003

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

105 participants
230 discussions

[Serusers] Re: Can you help me!
by 郝育鹏 07 Oct '03

07 Oct '03

Hello, How are you! I'am glad to receiving your letter! I'd give my question information.I beg your help! Thank you very much! 1,operating system: my Redhat7.3 (Linux 2.4.18-3) 2,SER distribution: ser 0.8.11 (i386/linux) 3, SER configuration file : # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.21.2.1 2003/07/30 16:46:18 andrei Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ #debug=8 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) #fork=no #log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E) alias="Lserver.net" # Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode debug=8 fork=no log_stderror=yes check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) #port=5060 #children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (len_gt( max_len )) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol record_route(); # loose-route processing if (loose_route()) { t_relay(); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication if (!www_authorize("Lserver.sict.net", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("Lserver.sict.net", "0"); break; }; save("location"); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; # forward to current uri now; use stateful forwarding; that # works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } 4, SER logs : When I apply the following configuration options: debug=8, log_stderror=yes, fork=no. show this information: ..... 0(0) DEBUG: udp_init: trying SO_RCVBUF: 262140 0(0) DEBUG: setting SO_RCVBUF; set=262140,verify=131070 0(0) DEBUG: setting SO_RCVBUF has no effect 0(0) DEBUG: udp_init: trying SO_RCVBUF: 133118 0(0) DEBUG: setting SO_RCVBUF; set=133118,verify=131070 0(0) DEBUG: setting SO_RCVBUF has no effect 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 131070 0(0) WARNING: using only the first listen address (no fork) 1(4499) DBG: open_uac_fifo: opening fifo... 1(4499) DEBUG: fifo /tmp/ser_fifo opened, mode=438 0(4497) DEBUG: init_mod_child (1): tm 0(4497) DEBUG: callid: '763e7fde-4497(a)127.0.0.1' 0(4497) DEBUG: init_mod_child (1): usrloc 1(4499) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-1): tm 1(4499) DEBUG: callid: '763e7fde-4499(a)127.0.0.1' 1(4499) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-1): usrloc 2(4500) INFO: fifo process starting: 4500 2(4500) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-2): tm 2(4500) DEBUG: callid: '763e7fde-4500(a)127.0.0.1' 2(4500) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-2): usrloc 1(4499) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-1): auth_db 0(4497) DEBUG: init_mod_child (1): auth_db 2(4500) DEBUG: init_mod_child (-2): auth_db 2(4500) SER: open_uac_fifo: fifo server up at /tmp/ser_fifo... It's no longer running,always stop! why? My SER log is : .... Oct 7 13:30:05 Lserver ser: WARNING: could not rev. resolve 210.72.128.44 Oct 7 13:30:05 Lserver 10月 7 13:30:05 ser: Listening on Oct 7 13:30:05 Lserver 10月 7 13:30:05 ser: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1 ]:5060 Oct 7 13:30:05 Lserver 10月 7 13:30:05 ser: 192.168.0.179 [192.1 68.0.179]:5060 Oct 7 13:30:05 Lserver 10月 7 13:30:05 ser: 210.72.128.44 [210.7 2.128.44]:5060 Oct 7 13:30:05 Lserver 10月 7 13:30:05 ser: Aliases: Lserver.sict.net:5060 loc alhost:5060 localhost.localdomain:5060 Lserver:5060 Lserver.net:* Oct 7 13:30:06 Lserver 10月 7 13:30:05 ser: ser startup succeeded Oct 7 13:49:07 Lserver 10月 7 13:49:07 ser: ser shutdown failed Oct 7 13:50:42 Lserver ser: parse error (14,1-2): parse error Oct 7 13:50:42 Lserver ser: parse error (14,1-2): Oct 7 13:51:24 Lserver ser: WARNING: could not rev. resolve 210.72.128.44 [root@Lserver /]# ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <Daniel-Constantin.Mierla(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> To: "郝育鹏" <haoypeng(a)sict.ac.cn> Cc: <serusers(a)iptel.org> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 7:26 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] Can you help me! Hello, did you add some users into database? Please follow the guidelines from http://www.iptel.org/ser/bugs/ and send us the result. We can't guess everything what happen into your system only from config file. You have commented some global parameters and that changed the behavior SER should have with default config file -- you even commented the number of children that means ser listens only on first network interface (I have to double check it, but it should be like that), and that is usually 127.0.0.1. We need the log messages, network dumps and so on ... Regards, "Daniel

3 2

[Serusers] Re:Can you help me
by 郝育鹏 07 Oct '03

07 Oct '03

Hello! How are you! Thank you! I have seen! But when I request SER,SER server start to continue running and show some question: ....... 5(5251) DEBUG: add_param: epid=78fc235044 5(5251) end of header reached, state=29 5(5251) parse_headers: flags=256 5(5251) end of header reached, state=9 5(5251) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [33]; uri=[sip:haoypeng@Lserver.sict.net] 5(5251) DEBUG: to body [<sip:haoypeng@Lserver.sict.net> 5(5251) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <REGISTER> 5(5251) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 5(5251) found end of header 5(5251) find_first_route(): No Route headers found 5(5251) loose_route(): There is no Route HF 5(5251) check_self - checking if host==us: 16==9 && [Lserver.sict.net] == [127 0.0.1] 5(5251) check_self - checking if host==us: 16==13 && [Lserver.sict.net] == [19 .168.0.179] 5(5251) check_self - checking if host==us: 16==13 && [Lserver.sict.net] == [21 .72.128.44] 5(5251) parse_headers: flags=4096 5(5251) pre_auth(): Credentials with given realm not found 5(5251) build_auth_hf(): 'WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="Lserver.sict.net", no ce="3f82ae01bb9e5c5720b768839131805780b4fc95" 5(5251) parse_headers: flags=-1 5(5251) check_via_address(192.168.0.244, 192.168.0.244, 3) 5(5251) receive_msg: cleaning up Why happen that Above ? I try testing manny times. But always like above. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <Daniel-Constantin.Mierla(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> To: "郝育鹏" <haoypeng(a)sict.ac.cn> Cc: <Serusers(a)iptel.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 4:57 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] Re: Can you help me! Hello, On 10/7/2003 8:29 AM, 郝育鹏 wrote: > [...] > > 4, SER logs : > as I told you, only the first network interface is used and that is 127.0.0.1 > > > > It's no longer running,always stop! why? My SER log is : Are you sure is not running? It stops here until a SIP request is received and then displays other debug messages. Here you had some errors in your config file (line 14), ser didn't start at that moment. Regards, }Daniel

2 1

RE: [Serusers] caller-id with raius using sip-rpid
by Steve Dolloff 07 Oct '03

07 Oct '03

OK, I understand now. The caller-id works correctly when I call out to the PSTN through a Cisco AS5350 gateway. The caller-id does not work when I call another ATA. I have to assume that the ATA does not support the remote-party-id field. Anyone else have experience with this, since I don't see any documentation related to remote-party-id on an ATA? I'll also post this to the cisco message boards and re-post any response that I get. Stephen Subject: RE: [Serusers] caller-id with raius using sip-rpid Well, as you see, rpid is attached to a non-numeric subscriber's request, so that it can be processed by devices capable of doing so. What is the problem then? -jiri At 11:21 PM 10/3/2003, Steve Dolloff wrote: >I want caller-id to work for a subscriber who has a non-numeric >username. > >Subject: Re: [Serusers] caller-id with raius using sip-rpid > >There is a Remote-Party-ID header in your message. What else do you >want ? Please be more specific and provide some examples, your >terminology is >hard to follow for me, sorry. > > Jan. > >On 03-10 16:05, Steve Dolloff wrote: >> Calling from one ata to another, proxied and registered through ser, >> here is my ngrep port 5060 output. Remote-party-id is being set but >not >> the call-id. >> >> U 219.242.10.153:5060 -> 226.145.234.80:5060 >> INVITE sip:256@226.145.234.80:5060;user=phone;transport=udp >> SIP/2.0..Max-Fo >> rwards: 10..Record-Route: >> <sip:256@219.242.10.153;ftag=2441840520;lr=on>..V >> ia: SIP/2.0/UDP 219.242.10.153;branch=z9hG4bK41f3.9e2c3976.0..Via: >> SIP/2.0/ >> UDP 226.145.234.113:5060;rport=5060..From: >> sip:test@voip2.test.net;tag=24418 >> 40520..To: <sip:256@voip2.test.net;user=phone>..Call-ID: >> 2303820380(a)226.145. >> 234.113..CSeq: 2 INVITE..Contact: >> <sip:test@226.145.234.113:5060;transport= >> udp>..User-Agent: Cisco ATA 186 v2.16.2 ata18x >> (030909a)..Authorization: D >> igest >> username="test",realm="voip2.test.net",nonce="3f7de542de99d4e832372e6b >> >> >812a73562d346e6f",uri="sip:256@voip2.test.net",response="1a4552ce6c6533 3 >> 439b >> 6a97672f415a5"..Expires: 300..Content-Length: 271..Content-Type: >> applicatio >> n/sdp..Remote-Party-ID: >> 222;party=calling;id-type=subscriber;screen=no....v >> =0..o=test 5648 5648 IN IP4 226.145.234.113..s=ATA186 Call..c=IN IP4 >> 226.14 >> 5.234.113..t=0 0..m=audio 16384 RTP/AVP 0 4 8 101..a=rtpmap:0 >> PCMU/8000/1.. >> a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000/1..a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000/1..a=rtpmap:101 >> telephone-even >> t/8000..a=fmtp:101 0-15..a=direction:active.. >> # >> U 226.145.234.80:5060 -> 219.242.10.153:5060 >> SIP/2.0 100 Trying..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> 219.242.10.153;branch=z9hG4bK41f3.9e2c >> 3976.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 226.145.234.113:5060;rport=5060..From: >> sip:test@vo >> ip2.test.net;tag=2441840520..To: >> <sip:256@voip2.test.net;user=phone>;tag=2077 >> 559661..Call-ID: 2303820380@226.145.234.113..CSeq: 2 INVITE..Server: >> Cisco >> ATA 186 v2.16.2 ata18x (030909a)..Content-Length: 0.... >> >> >> Subject: Re: [Serusers] caller-id with raius using sip-rpid >> >> Is there any Remote-Party-ID header field in outgoing INVITE ? If so >> then your gateway/whatever ignores it. >> >> Jan. >> >> On 02-10 15:18, Steve Dolloff wrote: >> > Any phone that supports caller-id. But I haven't gotten to work. >I'm >> > seeing the username instead. >> > >> > >> > Subject: RE: [Serusers] caller-id with raius using sip-rpid >> > >> > Which phone device should I use to see caller ID >> > information when using the ATA186? >> > >> > Alejandro >> > >> > --- Steve Dolloff <sdolloff(a)noc.test.net> escreveu: > >> > At the top of the config I have the following >> > > statement.... >> > > >> > > if (method=="INVITE") { >> > > record_route(); >> > > if (!radius_www_authorize("")) { >> > > log(1,"radius auth >> > > failure"); >> > > >> > > www_challenge("voip2.test.net","0"); >> > > break; >> > > }; >> > > append_rpid_hf(); >> > > }; >> > > >> > > If I call a phone with caller-id and my username is >> > > 256, it shows 256 on >> > > the phone, if I call with a username of test, it >> > > shows 4534 on the >> > > handset even though I have the sip-rpid set to 222. >> > > >> > > Stephen >> > > >> > > >> > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] caller-id with raius using >> > > sip-rpid >> > > >> > > Retrieving caller-id when users register doesn't >> > > work because REGISTER >> > > messages are processed by the server and the server >> > > generates a reply >> > > only. >> > > >> > > What you need is to insert Remote-Party-ID header >> > > field into INVITE >> > > message, to make it work you must authenticate also >> > > INVITE messages. >> > > My guess is that you do not authenticate INVITE >> > > messages and therefore >> > > there is nothing append_rpid_hf can add. >> > > >> > > Jan. >> > > >> > > On 02-10 11:35, Steve Dolloff wrote: >> > > > I want to retrieve the caller-id of a user from >> > > radius when they >> > > > register and use it when I redirect an invite >> > > request to the voicemail >> > > > system so that the voicemail system can route the >> > > call based on >> > > > caller-id. I also want to be able to send it to >> > > the sip gateway when >> > > I >> > > > am routing calls to the pstn. >> > > > >> > > > I have this in my config currently and it doesn't >> > > appear to set the >> > > > caller-id in the invite message. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > rewritehostport("219.242.10.153:5061"); >> > > > append_rpid_hf(); >> > > > t_relay(); >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] caller-id with raius using >> > > sip-rpid >> > > > >> > > > append_rpid_hf has no parameters. Version with 2 >> > > parameters is in >> > > > unstable branch in the CVS only. What exactly do >> > > you want to do ? >> > > > >> > > > Jan. >> > > > >> > > > On 02-10 11:26, Steve Dolloff wrote: >> > > > > I found this example in a previous Serusers >> > > message. >> > > > > >> > > > > append_rpid_hf("<sip:+", >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >"@zettou.net>;party=calling;id-type=subscriber;privacy=off;screen=yes") ; >> > > > > >> > > > > I tried calling append_rpid_hf();, but it does >> > > nothing. >> > > > > >> > > > > I also tried >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >append_rpid_hf("party=calling;id-type=subscriber;privacy=off;screen=yes " >> > > > > ); but I get an unknown command presumably >> > > because I am not using >> > > the >> > > > > right number of parameters. >> > > > > >> > > > > I only want to modify the calling-id info. >> > > > > >> > > > > Can anyone provide an example? >> > > > > >> > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] >> > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 11:09 AM >> > > > > To: Steve Dolloff >> > > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> > > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] caller-id with raius >> > > using sip-rpid >> > > > > >> > > > > If you want to add Remote-Party-ID header field >> > > then you have to >> > > call >> > > > > append_rpid_hf function in your script. >> > > > > >> > > > > Jan. >> > > > > >> > > > > On 02-10 11:07, Steve Dolloff wrote: >> > > > > > OK, I am setting up a Voicemail system (using >> > > asterisk) and I am >> > > > > > currently doing a rewritehostport(ip:port) and >> > > then trelay() to >> > > send >> > > > > it >> > > > > > to the voicemail system if an invite fails. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Should I change something? See my ser.cfg and >> > > output from the call >> > > > to >> > > > > > the vm. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Here is the code from ser.cfg >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > rewritehostport("219.242.10.153:5061"); >> > > > > > t_relay(); >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Here is the sip info from asterisk. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > INVITE sip:200@219.242.10.153:5061;user=phone >> > > SIP/2.0 >> > > > > > Max-Forwards: 10 >> > > > > > Record-Route: >> > > <sip:200@219.242.10.153;ftag=2236658534;lr=on> >> > > > > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> > > 219.242.10.153;branch=z9hG4bK13de.31901234.0 >> > > > > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> > > 226.145.234.113:5060;rport=5060 >> > > > > > From: sip:test@voip2.test.net;tag=2236658534 >> > > > > > To: <sip:200@voip2.test.net;user=phone> >> > > > > > Call-ID: 2218108971(a)226.145.234.113 >> > > > > > CSeq: 1 INVITE >> > > > > > Contact: >> > > <sip:test@226.145.234.113:5060;transport=udp> >> > > > > > User-Agent: Cisco ATA 186 v2.16.2 ata18x >> > > (030909a) >> > > > > > Expires: 300 >> > > > > > Content-Length: 271 >> > > > > > Content-Type: application/sdp >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] caller-id with raius >> > > using sip-rpid >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Remote-Party-ID header field is inserted into >> > > forwarded requests, >> > > > not >> > > > > > responses. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Jan. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On 02-10 10:53, Steve Dolloff wrote: >> > > > > > > Ser doesn't appear to be passing the >> > > Caller-id to the ata at >> > > auth >> > > > or >> > > > > I >> > > > > > > am doing something wrong. Can anyone point >> > > me in the right >> > > > > direction? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Stephen >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I have the following entry in my freeradius >> > > users file. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > test(a)voip2.test.net Auth-Type := Digest, >> > > User-Password == "test" >> > > > > > > Reply-Message = "Hello, test with >> > > digest", Sip-Rpid = >> > > > > > > "8472222222" >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > When I run a radclient test I get the >> > > correct info.. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > radclient -f digest.test 219.242.10.153:1812 >> > > auth testing >> > > > > > > Received response ID 134, code 2, length = >> > > 57 >> > > >> > === message truncated === >> > >> > Yahoo! Mail - o melhor webmail do Brasil >> > http://mail.yahoo.com.br > >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

2 1

[Serusers] CPL editor
by Kevin Chu 07 Oct '03

07 Oct '03

Hi Bogdan, I am interested for using the cpl-c module with ser. Is that necessary to use mySQL with cpl-c? Can I use dbtext instead? Could you provide me more instruction and sample ser.cfg for using cpl-c? Thanks! BR, Kevin ------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 21:49:54 +0200 From: Bogdan-Andrei IANCU <iancu(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> Subject: [Serusers] CPL editor To: sr(a)lists.iptel.org, serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Message-ID: <3F6B5DE2.1090301(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed A new release (1.2) of CPLEd is available now at: https://developer.berlios.de/projects/cpled/ Works great against ser with the new cpl-c modules ;-) Bogdan

3 2

[Serusers] newbie to SIP Express Router
by Ajeet 07 Oct '03

07 Oct '03

Hi, I am newbie to ser, and wnat to install and configure ser on my computer. Still I am reading infomration on internet for the configuration and installation of ser, but any information provided on this forum would certainly help me a lot. Here are the details. My OS RedHat linux 9. i have downloaded ser-0.8.11-0.i386.rpm and installed it simply by command rpm -i ser-0.8.11-0.i386.rpm what to do next? Why i need ser? Actually i have to show working ip-telephony service as a requirement in our course. The scenario is that, we have our private LAN (intranet) and i have to install and configure the ip-telephony service so that one cleint on the intranet can call other client on the sane intranet, i will use either Kphone or BonePhone as a client. So if some one can help me in establishing this service. I dont need to call outside my intranet or even i dont need some advanced features like security/authentication or any other thing other thing. -ajeet. stockholm. -- Ajeet ajeetnk(a)fastmail.fm -- http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail

2 1

Re: [Serusers] Multple SER servers on same domain
by Tjardick van der Kraan 07 Oct '03

07 Oct '03

sorry i forgot the list cc.. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tjardick van der Kraan" <tjardick(a)vanderkraan.net> To: "Jan Janak" <jan(a)iptel.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [Serusers] Multple SER servers on same domain > Hi Jan, > > Well what i'm looking into is putting SER up on our wireless community > Network. > > But as that as different segments and every now and then a wireless link > drops out i was thinking about creating some sort of islands which each > having their local SER server (.e.g set the dns on to a local ip for that > area) but in case the interconnection between the 'islands' is up and > running it would be nice if i on one 'island' would dial someone on another > island that the connection still could be setup. > > e.g an INVITE would go to local server > > but the local server (incase that user isn't logged in there) would > go and try server1, server2, etc. > > Hope this explains a bit more what i mean. > > Greetings, > > Tjardick > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jan Janak" <jan(a)iptel.org> > To: "Tjardick van der Kraan" <tjardick(a)vanderkraan.net> > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:13 AM > Subject: Re: [Serusers] Multple SER servers on same domain > > > > Hello, > > > > I am not sure I fully understood. Let me ask one question, what is this > > good for ? > > > > You can certainly have several ser servers, each of them could have it's > > own location table (i.e. it's own database of currently registered > > users) and all of them can share the same subscriber table (i.e. you > > will have one common source of usernames and passwords for all the > > servers). Is that what are you looking for ? > > > > What you want can be probably accomplished using one server too. > > > > Jan. > > > > On 06-10 14:38, Tjardick van der Kraan wrote: > > > Hello Everyone, > > > > > > Just a new face on the mailinglist (only been lurking so far) so just a > > > friendly hi from me to all of you. > > > > > > I was wondering if the following idea could be realised with the use of > SER > > > and some (advanced) routing rules. > > > > > > One main SER server with one or more 'slave' SER servers running at > their > > > own location with a synchronized user database, but with their own > presence > > > table. > > > > > > e.g. if someone on the main SER server asks for a connectiong with a > user on > > > a 'sub' ser server of the same domain, the main SER server looks up if > the > > > user is online on it's server if not it checks if the user is online on > one > > > (or more) sub servers. > > > > > > What i like to accomplish is multple local networks that run their own > ser > > > server and support their 'local' connections, but sometimes there is a > > > connection available to another local network, in which case more users > can > > > be reached. so on a request and fail of the user online on the local > server > > > it would try and see if it can connect to (any) other server and if so > query > > > if the user is online there. > > > > > > so everyone will be user(a)domain.com but it would point to the ip of the > > > local server. > > > > > > Any config examples on how to achive this if possible would really be > > > appreciated. > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Tjardick van der Kraan > > > > > > -- > > > Tjardick van der Kraan > > > tjardick(a)vanderkraan.net > > > > > > Tel +32 4 34 40 522 > > > Fax +32 4 34 40 525 > > > GSM +32 497 45 27 36 > > > > > > IAXtel: 1 700 344 0522 > > > FWD: 26322 > > > IPtel: 91331 > > > > > > Rue des Pocheteux 10 > > > 4020 Jupille > > > Belgium > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Serusers mailing list > > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > >

2 1

[Serusers] SMS device to test
by Soo Wei Kang 07 Oct '03

07 Oct '03

Hello, I would like to test the SMS Gateway feature. May I know which device works with the SMS Gateway? Specifically, can you please tell me the Brand and the Model that works? Has anybody tested with the Nokia 30 or Siemens M20 Terminal before? What is the standard AT commands that the SMS Gateway support? I'm not too familiar with this, but, is it something like ETS GSM 07.05 or maybe something else? Thanks. Regards, WK

2 1

[Serusers] Hello
by Hassan CHOUMAR 07 Oct '03

07 Oct '03

Hello, I have a problem in the recording of server SER, as soon as I put the personal information during the phase of recording about the serweb to assign an address personal SIP, it sends me a message to confirm me that a mail will be sent in my inbox mail. But I receive any mail in my inbox mail. A person know Where comes the problem. Hassan ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/

2 3

[Serusers] How can we connect calls of two independent unknown SIP domains.
by John Foster 07 Oct '03

07 Oct '03

Hi all, Here is a scenario, i m working on, If anyone can comment on it. Scenario: I have two SIP domains, abc.com and xvz.com sip.abc.com is running ser and has registered users with xxxx(a)abc.com similarly sip.xyz.com is serving users xxxx(a)xyz.com sip.abc.com and sip.xyz.com can be resolved through standard dns servers as SRV hosts for their respective domains. There is no explicitly defined routing procedure on ser.conf for other domain, in both SIP servers machines. Is it possible for xxxx(a)abc.com to register with sip.abc.com and place a call to user xxxx(a)xyz.com. While trying, i m getting no packet on sip.abc.com not sip.xyz.com for the subject call. Any comment? JF --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search

4 11

[Serusers] Registrar.so error
by giAndrea 07 Oct '03

07 Oct '03

Hi, another problem. After compilation of new sources (0.8.12dev-17-cristian) i've found this problem in modules registrar.so during execution (/etc/init/ser start) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) fixing /usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so save Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_malloc(0x42134000, 16) called from dlist.c: new_dlist(156) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_malloc(0x42134000, 16) returns address 0x422bea0c frag. 0x422be9f4 (size=16) on 1 -th hit Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_malloc(0x42134000, 8) called from dlist.c: new_dlist(163) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_malloc(0x42134000, 8) returns address 0x422bea4c frag. 0x422bea34 (size=8) on 1 -th hit Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_malloc(0x42134000, 36) called from udomain.c: new_udomain(117) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_malloc(0x42134000, 36) returns address 0x422bea84 frag. 0x422bea6c (size=36) on 1 -th hit Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_malloc(0x42134000, 8192) called from udomain.c: new_udomain(124) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_malloc(0x42134000, 8192) returns address 0x422bead8 frag. 0x422beac0 (size=8192) on 1 -th hit Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_malloc(0x80c17c0, 9) called from db_con.c: use_table(53) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_malloc(0x80c17c0, 12) returns address 0x80cb9dc frag. 0x80cb9c4 (size=12) on 1 -th hit Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) submit_query(): Unknown column 'flags' in 'field list' Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) submit_query(): Error while submitting query Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) preload_udomain(): Error while doing db_query Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) register_udomain(): Error while preloading domain 'location' Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x42134000, 0x422bead8), called from udomain.c: free_udomain(164) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x422beac0 alloc'ed from udomain.c: new_udomain(124) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x42134000, 0x422bea84), called from udomain.c: free_udomain(168) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x422bea6c alloc'ed from udomain.c: new_udomain(117) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x42134000, 0x422bea4c), called from dlist.c: register_udomain(218) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x422bea34 alloc'ed from dlist.c: new_dlist(163) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x42134000, 0x422bea0c), called from dlist.c: register_udomain(219) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x422be9f4 alloc'ed from dlist.c: new_dlist(156) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) domain_fixup(): Error while registering domain Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: ERROR: error ffffffff while trying to fix configuration Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80c8558), called from sr_module.c: destroy_modules(303) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80c8540 alloc'ed from sr_module.c: register_module(135) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80cb93c), called from auth_mod.c: destroy(221) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80cb924 alloc'ed from auth_mod.c: generate_random_secret(163) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80c84c8), called from sr_module.c: destroy_modules(303) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80c84b0 alloc'ed from sr_module.c: register_module(135) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80cb89c), called from sdp_mangler.c: free_compiled_expresions(538) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80cb884 alloc'ed from sdp_mangler.c: compile_expresions(499) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80cb8ec), called from sdp_mangler.c: free_compiled_expresions(544) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80cb8d4 alloc'ed from sdp_mangler.c: compile_expresions(515) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80c8438), called from sr_module.c: destroy_modules(303) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80c8420 alloc'ed from sr_module.c: register_module(135) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80c83a8), called from sr_module.c: destroy_modules(303) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80c8390 alloc'ed from sr_module.c: register_module(135) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80c831c), called from sr_module.c: destroy_modules(303) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80c8304 alloc'ed from sr_module.c: register_module(135) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80c828c), called from sr_module.c: destroy_modules(303) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80c8274 alloc'ed from sr_module.c: register_module(135) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80c81f8), called from sr_module.c: destroy_modules(303) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80c81e0 alloc'ed from sr_module.c: register_module(135) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80cb57c), called from dbase.c: disconnect_db(128) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80cb564 alloc'ed from dbase.c: connect_db(88) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80cb9dc), called from dbase.c: db_close(321) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80cb9c4 alloc'ed from db_con.c: use_table(53) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80cb4e4), called from dbase.c: db_close(323) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80cb4cc alloc'ed from dbase.c: db_init(286) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80c8164), called from sr_module.c: destroy_modules(303) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80c814c alloc'ed from sr_module.c: register_module(135) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80c80d4), called from sr_module.c: destroy_modules(303) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80c80bc alloc'ed from sr_module.c: register_module(135) Oct 6 16:19:09 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free(0x80c17c0, 0x80c8044), called from sr_module.c: destroy_modules(303) Oct 6 16:19:11 webby ser: 0(0) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x80c802c alloc'ed from sr_module.c: register_module(135) Oct 6 16:19:11 webby ser: 0(0) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : start Oct 6 16:19:11 webby ser: ser startup succeeded Oct 6 16:22:38 webby ser: WARNING: could not rev. resolve 217.57.90.117 Oct 6 16:22:38 webby ser: WARNING: could not rev. resolve 192.168.100.117 217.57.90.117 and 192.168.100.117 are my two eth interfaces any idea? bye, Andrea

3 3

← Newer
1
...
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
...
23
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users October 2003