well its doing something different now -- when I dial a call, it adds it to the location table in mysql. on the phone, it doesn't ring or anything, it just brings me right back to the WFC screen....
Any ideas?
-----Original Message-----
From: Kannaiyan Natesan [mailto:nkans@lycos.co.uk]
Sent: Wed 12/3/2003 3:29 PM
To: Chris Monahan; serusers(a)iptel.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Serusers] help with the setup of Ser.
Sorry. that should be
if( method =="REGISTER") {
save("location");
};
Kannaiyan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kannaiyan Natesan" <nkans(a)lycos.co.uk>
To: "Chris Monahan" <chris(a)loudpacket.com>; <serusers(a)iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] help with the setup of Ser.
> Remove the "if( uri==myself )" condition completely & add the following
>
> if( method == INVITE) {
> save("location");
> };
>
> this should register all the phones coming to your server. and you should
> able to call them without any problems.
>
> Kannaiyan
>
> http://www.speak2world.com -- Call with your own domain !!!
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Monahan" <chris(a)loudpacket.com>
> To: <serusers(a)iptel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:14 PM
> Subject: [Serusers] help with the setup of Ser.
>
>
> > Hello people...
> >
> > I have been working on Ser all day. I have read every manual possible,
and
> am about to lose it! My setup is pretty simple. Ser is running on
> 192.168.3.1... it is a dhcp server, tftp server, and ser server.
> >
> > I have 2 Cisco IP Phones (7960)...
> >
> > They both connect to 192.168.3.1 just fine. They download the latest
rom,
> they have the appropriate lines in the top right of the screen.
> >
> > Everything seems fine, until I attempt to make a call.
> >
> > Running serctl monitor shows me that everytime a call is placed, it gets
> an error 404 - Not Found. I was getting error 483 earlier, but I read
the
> documentation some more and fixed it.
> >
> > I have setup locations for the two users (sip:chris@192.168.3.1) and
> (sip:allan@192.168.3.1), and aliases as well..
> >
> > Still, I cannot make a call between the two phones. Everytime I try, I
get
> a busy tone on the phone, and error 404...
> >
> > Can anyone please help?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > Serusers(a)iptel.org
> > http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers(a)iptel.org
> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
Hello people...
I have been working on Ser all day. I have read every manual possible, and am about to lose it! My setup is pretty simple. Ser is running on 192.168.3.1... it is a dhcp server, tftp server, and ser server.
I have 2 Cisco IP Phones (7960)...
They both connect to 192.168.3.1 just fine. They download the latest rom, they have the appropriate lines in the top right of the screen.
Everything seems fine, until I attempt to make a call.
Running serctl monitor shows me that everytime a call is placed, it gets an error 404 - Not Found. I was getting error 483 earlier, but I read the documentation some more and fixed it.
I have setup locations for the two users (sip:chris@192.168.3.1) and (sip:allan@192.168.3.1), and aliases as well..
Still, I cannot make a call between the two phones. Everytime I try, I get a busy tone on the phone, and error 404...
Can anyone please help?
Thanks!
Do I need to do anything special with rtpproxy?
-----Original Message-----
From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:44 PM
To: Darren Sessions
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
Take a loot at the nathelper_rtp.cfg file under the modules/nathelper
directory. It contains the basics of what you need.
The funcionality is basically determined by these lines:
if (method=="INVITE") {
record_route();
if (isflagset(1)) { # ATA ?
force_rtp_proxy();
};
/* set up reply processing */
t_on_reply("1");
};
.
.
.
onreply_route[1] {
if (status=~"1[0-9][0-9]" && search("Server: Cisco ATA.*"))
fix_nated_contact();
force_rtp_proxy();
}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:20 PM
Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> Hmmm.. You wouldn't by chance have a "scrubbed" version of your
> configuration file I could look at would you? It would be most helpful.
>
> Thanks for everything,
>
> - Darren
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:18 PM
> To: Darren Sessions
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
>
>
> We have nathelper/rtpproxy/SER all on the same server. The ser.cfg must
be
> configured to invoke the nathelper/rtproxy functions as needed.
>
> I cannot comment on SEMS since we don't use it.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
> To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net>
> Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:11 PM
> Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
>
>
> > My next questions is then, what configuration changes do I make to the
> > nathelper server to make it forward requests made from the endpoints to
> the
> > primary ser box? and how does voicemail come into play (using sems)?
Does
> > the nathelper server "know" about all the servers or simply does the
> > signaling traffic and rtp traffic get routed through the nathelper box?
> >
> > Thanks a ton for all the help!
> >
> > - Darren
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:46 AM
> > To: Darren Sessions
> > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> >
> >
> > It works great on RedHat. We have it running now for about 4 months on
> our
> > production servers and it has never crashed
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
> > To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net>
> > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:16 AM
> > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> >
> >
> > > I'm starting over on a Redhat Linux box right now.
> > >
> > > I'll let you know how it goes..
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:15 AM
> > > To: Darren Sessions
> > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> > >
> > >
> > > Darren,
> > >
> > > 3 months ago I tried to get this to work on Solaris 8. Maxim also put
> > some
> > > time into it but I was never able to get it to compile. If you have
> > better
> > > luck please let us all know.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Andres.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
> > > To: "Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul" <pelinescu-onciul(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> > > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:40 AM
> > > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> > >
> > >
> > > > I am having problems compiling rtpproxy on a Sun Netra 1400t with
> > Solaris
> > > 9.
> > > >
> > > > root:/export/home/rtpproxy # make all
> > > > cc -o main.o -c main.c
> > > > In file included from main.c:45:
> > > > myqueue.h:40:23: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory
> > > > main.c:51:17: err.h: No such file or directory
> > > > main.c: In function `main':
> > > > main.c:486: structure has no member named `sun_len'
> > > > make: *** [main.o] Error 1
> > > >
> > > > I am new to this stuff, so everyone will have to bear with me.
> > > >
> > > > I can't seem to find cdefs.h or err.h. I did however throw the
> > > Makefile.gnu
> > > > up as Makefile and uncommented the section labeled "for Solaris".
> > > >
> > > > Any help would be appreciated! :)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > - Darren
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
> > > > [mailto:pelinescu-onciul@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:36 PM
> > > > To: Darren Sessions
> > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 02, 2003 at 17:10, Darren Sessions <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but is the typical setup for
> > Nathelper
> > > > and
> > > > > Portaone RTP proxy work on seperate servers with dual network
cards?
> > > >
> > > > No. nathelper use unix sockets to communicate with rtprpoxy so they
> must
> > > > be located on the same box (ser runing nathelper and rtproxy).
> > > >
> > > > Also it is better to run/configure them on only one interface (to
> avoid
> > > > packets with different source address than the destination of the
> > intial
> > > > packet going back to the nat).
> > > >
> > > > >then
> > > > > talking to another SER box doing registrations and call routing?
and
> > the
> > > > > Portaone RTP taking the voice packets?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Andrei
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Serusers mailing list
> > > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
Great!!
Thanks again!!
-----Original Message-----
From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:44 PM
To: Darren Sessions
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
Take a loot at the nathelper_rtp.cfg file under the modules/nathelper
directory. It contains the basics of what you need.
The funcionality is basically determined by these lines:
if (method=="INVITE") {
record_route();
if (isflagset(1)) { # ATA ?
force_rtp_proxy();
};
/* set up reply processing */
t_on_reply("1");
};
.
.
.
onreply_route[1] {
if (status=~"1[0-9][0-9]" && search("Server: Cisco ATA.*"))
fix_nated_contact();
force_rtp_proxy();
}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:20 PM
Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> Hmmm.. You wouldn't by chance have a "scrubbed" version of your
> configuration file I could look at would you? It would be most helpful.
>
> Thanks for everything,
>
> - Darren
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:18 PM
> To: Darren Sessions
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
>
>
> We have nathelper/rtpproxy/SER all on the same server. The ser.cfg must
be
> configured to invoke the nathelper/rtproxy functions as needed.
>
> I cannot comment on SEMS since we don't use it.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
> To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net>
> Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:11 PM
> Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
>
>
> > My next questions is then, what configuration changes do I make to the
> > nathelper server to make it forward requests made from the endpoints to
> the
> > primary ser box? and how does voicemail come into play (using sems)?
Does
> > the nathelper server "know" about all the servers or simply does the
> > signaling traffic and rtp traffic get routed through the nathelper box?
> >
> > Thanks a ton for all the help!
> >
> > - Darren
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:46 AM
> > To: Darren Sessions
> > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> >
> >
> > It works great on RedHat. We have it running now for about 4 months on
> our
> > production servers and it has never crashed
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
> > To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net>
> > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:16 AM
> > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> >
> >
> > > I'm starting over on a Redhat Linux box right now.
> > >
> > > I'll let you know how it goes..
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:15 AM
> > > To: Darren Sessions
> > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> > >
> > >
> > > Darren,
> > >
> > > 3 months ago I tried to get this to work on Solaris 8. Maxim also put
> > some
> > > time into it but I was never able to get it to compile. If you have
> > better
> > > luck please let us all know.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Andres.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
> > > To: "Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul" <pelinescu-onciul(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> > > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:40 AM
> > > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> > >
> > >
> > > > I am having problems compiling rtpproxy on a Sun Netra 1400t with
> > Solaris
> > > 9.
> > > >
> > > > root:/export/home/rtpproxy # make all
> > > > cc -o main.o -c main.c
> > > > In file included from main.c:45:
> > > > myqueue.h:40:23: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory
> > > > main.c:51:17: err.h: No such file or directory
> > > > main.c: In function `main':
> > > > main.c:486: structure has no member named `sun_len'
> > > > make: *** [main.o] Error 1
> > > >
> > > > I am new to this stuff, so everyone will have to bear with me.
> > > >
> > > > I can't seem to find cdefs.h or err.h. I did however throw the
> > > Makefile.gnu
> > > > up as Makefile and uncommented the section labeled "for Solaris".
> > > >
> > > > Any help would be appreciated! :)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > - Darren
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
> > > > [mailto:pelinescu-onciul@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:36 PM
> > > > To: Darren Sessions
> > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 02, 2003 at 17:10, Darren Sessions <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but is the typical setup for
> > Nathelper
> > > > and
> > > > > Portaone RTP proxy work on seperate servers with dual network
cards?
> > > >
> > > > No. nathelper use unix sockets to communicate with rtprpoxy so they
> must
> > > > be located on the same box (ser runing nathelper and rtproxy).
> > > >
> > > > Also it is better to run/configure them on only one interface (to
> avoid
> > > > packets with different source address than the destination of the
> > intial
> > > > packet going back to the nat).
> > > >
> > > > >then
> > > > > talking to another SER box doing registrations and call routing?
and
> > the
> > > > > Portaone RTP taking the voice packets?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Andrei
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Serusers mailing list
> > > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
Hmmm.. You wouldn't by chance have a "scrubbed" version of your
configuration file I could look at would you? It would be most helpful.
Thanks for everything,
- Darren
-----Original Message-----
From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:18 PM
To: Darren Sessions
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
We have nathelper/rtpproxy/SER all on the same server. The ser.cfg must be
configured to invoke the nathelper/rtproxy functions as needed.
I cannot comment on SEMS since we don't use it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:11 PM
Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> My next questions is then, what configuration changes do I make to the
> nathelper server to make it forward requests made from the endpoints to
the
> primary ser box? and how does voicemail come into play (using sems)? Does
> the nathelper server "know" about all the servers or simply does the
> signaling traffic and rtp traffic get routed through the nathelper box?
>
> Thanks a ton for all the help!
>
> - Darren
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:46 AM
> To: Darren Sessions
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
>
>
> It works great on RedHat. We have it running now for about 4 months on
our
> production servers and it has never crashed
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
> To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net>
> Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:16 AM
> Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
>
>
> > I'm starting over on a Redhat Linux box right now.
> >
> > I'll let you know how it goes..
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:15 AM
> > To: Darren Sessions
> > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> >
> >
> > Darren,
> >
> > 3 months ago I tried to get this to work on Solaris 8. Maxim also put
> some
> > time into it but I was never able to get it to compile. If you have
> better
> > luck please let us all know.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andres.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
> > To: "Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul" <pelinescu-onciul(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:40 AM
> > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> >
> >
> > > I am having problems compiling rtpproxy on a Sun Netra 1400t with
> Solaris
> > 9.
> > >
> > > root:/export/home/rtpproxy # make all
> > > cc -o main.o -c main.c
> > > In file included from main.c:45:
> > > myqueue.h:40:23: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory
> > > main.c:51:17: err.h: No such file or directory
> > > main.c: In function `main':
> > > main.c:486: structure has no member named `sun_len'
> > > make: *** [main.o] Error 1
> > >
> > > I am new to this stuff, so everyone will have to bear with me.
> > >
> > > I can't seem to find cdefs.h or err.h. I did however throw the
> > Makefile.gnu
> > > up as Makefile and uncommented the section labeled "for Solaris".
> > >
> > > Any help would be appreciated! :)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > - Darren
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
> > > [mailto:pelinescu-onciul@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:36 PM
> > > To: Darren Sessions
> > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 02, 2003 at 17:10, Darren Sessions <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
> > wrote:
> > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but is the typical setup for
> Nathelper
> > > and
> > > > Portaone RTP proxy work on seperate servers with dual network cards?
> > >
> > > No. nathelper use unix sockets to communicate with rtprpoxy so they
must
> > > be located on the same box (ser runing nathelper and rtproxy).
> > >
> > > Also it is better to run/configure them on only one interface (to
avoid
> > > packets with different source address than the destination of the
> intial
> > > packet going back to the nat).
> > >
> > > >then
> > > > talking to another SER box doing registrations and call routing? and
> the
> > > > Portaone RTP taking the voice packets?
> > >
> > >
> > > Andrei
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >
> > >
> >
Hi,
I'm just getting started with SER and SERWeb on a FreeBSD 5.1 system.
The SER install went smoothly (compiled from source) and the database
seemed to go in fine. Once SER was in place I went looking for serweb
but there wasn't a package for 'latest' yet (that I could find).
I tried the serweb package from 0.8.11 and ran into some problems (I
just grabbed serweb from CVS and it seems to be the same).
1) in config.php (and a few other places I'm now forgetting) the user
pages path is set (or hard-coded) to /user/, however the included
directory is user_interface/
(e.g. $this->user_pages_path = $this->root_path."user/";, as well as the
reg and confirmation URLs)
That was easy enough to fix, however it was somewhat concerning.
2) After submitting a request for an account and following the emailed
URL, I've consistently gotten errors. They seem to point at the
database, but reinit'ing it did not help.
The errors were:
- error in SQL query, line: 43 (from the confirmation.php page)
- Something to do with aliases (cannot currently generate the error)
like use save("aliases") or update("aliases) in config script before using.
The second error seems to be a problem, as the account is added, but
without the requested phone number aliased. (there don't seem to be any
aliases).
3) I consistently get a 404 not found when trying to IM any of the users
on the system - is this also related to the lack of/problem with aliases?
Aside from these errors, I was able to register with two Cisco 7960s
using the requested and confirmed accounts (not yet able to test
calling, although without the aliases I assume it would fail) as well as
modify account parameters from serweb.
Is there a specific release of serweb that should be used with 0.8.12,
or one that is "least buggy"?
Thank you,
~Aaron
My next questions is then, what configuration changes do I make to the
nathelper server to make it forward requests made from the endpoints to the
primary ser box? and how does voicemail come into play (using sems)? Does
the nathelper server "know" about all the servers or simply does the
signaling traffic and rtp traffic get routed through the nathelper box?
Thanks a ton for all the help!
- Darren
-----Original Message-----
From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:46 AM
To: Darren Sessions
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
It works great on RedHat. We have it running now for about 4 months on our
production servers and it has never crashed
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:16 AM
Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> I'm starting over on a Redhat Linux box right now.
>
> I'll let you know how it goes..
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:15 AM
> To: Darren Sessions
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
>
>
> Darren,
>
> 3 months ago I tried to get this to work on Solaris 8. Maxim also put
some
> time into it but I was never able to get it to compile. If you have
better
> luck please let us all know.
>
> Thanks,
> Andres.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
> To: "Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul" <pelinescu-onciul(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:40 AM
> Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
>
>
> > I am having problems compiling rtpproxy on a Sun Netra 1400t with
Solaris
> 9.
> >
> > root:/export/home/rtpproxy # make all
> > cc -o main.o -c main.c
> > In file included from main.c:45:
> > myqueue.h:40:23: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory
> > main.c:51:17: err.h: No such file or directory
> > main.c: In function `main':
> > main.c:486: structure has no member named `sun_len'
> > make: *** [main.o] Error 1
> >
> > I am new to this stuff, so everyone will have to bear with me.
> >
> > I can't seem to find cdefs.h or err.h. I did however throw the
> Makefile.gnu
> > up as Makefile and uncommented the section labeled "for Solaris".
> >
> > Any help would be appreciated! :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > - Darren
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
> > [mailto:pelinescu-onciul@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:36 PM
> > To: Darren Sessions
> > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
> >
> >
> > On Dec 02, 2003 at 17:10, Darren Sessions <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net>
> wrote:
> > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but is the typical setup for
Nathelper
> > and
> > > Portaone RTP proxy work on seperate servers with dual network cards?
> >
> > No. nathelper use unix sockets to communicate with rtprpoxy so they must
> > be located on the same box (ser runing nathelper and rtproxy).
> >
> > Also it is better to run/configure them on only one interface (to avoid
> > packets with different source address than the destination of the
intial
> > packet going back to the nat).
> >
> > >then
> > > talking to another SER box doing registrations and call routing? and
the
> > > Portaone RTP taking the voice packets?
> >
> >
> > Andrei
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
>
Folks,
I've registered new radiusclient-ng project on BerliOS. This project is
based on the existing radiusclient (approval is pending, first drop of
code and project page should be available tomorrow). My goal is to merge
in SIP-related changes from the SER, and also incorporate some other
improvements that Porta made locally. Unfortunately current maintainer
of the radiusclient doesn't respond to e-mail inquiries, which is the
reason for the fork.
Following is incomplete list of features to be implemented in the next
revision of radiusclient library:
- OOB support for SIP digest VSA attributes;
- ability to bind library to some specific IP address, which is useful
when there is a need to run several SER copies on the same machine but
on different IP addresses;
- full re-entrancy;
- python bindings.
If somebody has any other features in mind or is willing to help with
the work please let me know.
Thanks!
-Maxim
Hi,
after reading through the archive of this list I feel like I need to
come up with an old issue once again, since I have not found a suitable
solution for my setup.
I have to user agents. #1 is a registered iptel user and #2 is
registered with say "ipfon.org". UA #2 is only capable of numerical
adressing within its own realm (such as a Grandstream phone). UA #1 is
known to the world as 12345678(a)iptel.org and can be reached from UA #2
through its proxy by inviting 39312345678(a)ipfon.org (i.e. the user can
dial 39312345678 on the Grandstream to reach UA #1).
It would be terrific to submit a working callback address for UA #1 to
UA #2. This callback address however, needs to be within the called
party's realm, I believe (the Grandstream has comes with a dialpad
only). Unlike some pstn gateways the Grandstream does not parse the
Remote-Party-ID header field. Is there another header field to address
this issue? If not, I have no idea how this can be solved but by
rewriting the From header such as
UA #1 Proxy UA
#2
INVITE --> "REWRITE" -->
INVITE
From: 12345678(a)iptel.org From:
39312345678(a)ipfon.org
and keeping track of any subsequent messages. How would you approach
this problem?
I read through tmemo-jiri-sat.txt as this memo adresses the potential
problems and suggest an implementation. Has anybody started to implement
the suggested solution?
Thilo
Have you enabled record-route? If not, the clients try to send the BYE
message directly without using ser+nathelper.
Klaus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pablo Murillo [mailto:ser@rednet.com.ar]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:30 PM
> To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] LINUX gateway with RTP Proxy & STUN Server
>
>
> I'm answering to myself :)
>
> > Now the question:
> >
> > What I need to get a "clear" connection to SER with public
> IP from my
> > Intranet ?
>
> With rtpproxy & NAT, X-Ten works better
>
> I added to make things simple & for test:
> -----------------
> if (method=="INVITE") {
> force_rtp_proxy();
> t_on_reply("1");
> }
>
> /* NAT */
> onreply_route[1] {
> if (status=~"[12][0-9][0-9]")
> force_rtp_proxy();
> }
> -----------------
> This solved audio problem placing call from intranet, BUT:
> - it doesn't recognize hang-up
> - I can't pleace calls from ATA with it's own IP to x-ten in
> the intranet
>
> what am I forgetting ?
>
> Thanks
> Pablo Murillo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
