At section:
Admin Guide 0.8.11 - Troubleshooting -
Question: Q: On a multihomed host, ......
Answer: Set the configuration option mhome to "1"
That's wrong, option is called mhomed, not mhome.
^
regards,
Klaus
I'm new to Ser and would like to set up a test lab with a couple different
ip phones / adapters to learn from. Could someone recommend a few devices
that we could use for that purpose?
Would like to install a FX voice card in a Cisco 1750 router. Is there a
particular card that others have found works?
Any suggestions on a SIP IP phone?
Thoughts on the ATA186?
TIA,
Rich
PHP directive register_globals went from ON to OFF in PHP 4.2.0. Serweb
requires register_globals set to On. Find your functioning php.ini ,modify
it and try.
No, there is not problem.
--M
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:56 AM
To: Marcelo Schmidt
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] www_authorize()
Hello,
sorry, but I don't understand. Is there any problem or is it working ?
If your users get 401 then enabled debugging (debug=9) and see the
server outputs, there should be some messages from auth module.
Jan.
On 09-07 16:30, Marcelo Schmidt wrote:
> I am trying to find out why users get 401. This simple error got me.
> Server realm is siptest.corp.equinix.com so if
> (!www_authorize("siptest.corp.equinix.com", "subscriber")) {...}
>
> The table subscriber, domain: displaying localhost. It should read
> siptest.corp.equinix.com. Based on the code under modules/auth sip
> gets stripped and ha1 creates: gen_ha1 marcelo localhost sermarcelo
> 2686e9018da810053455be71a35d6928
> In subscriber ha1: 2686e9018da810053455be71a35d6928 (all OK so far
with
> ha1)
>
> But I forgot when I installed this version for some reason
> SIP_DOMAIN=localhost SO NEVER DO THAT! :)
>
> --M
>
> Btw: I am running ser 0.8.11pre29 (i386/netbsd) so far w/mysql all OK.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:36 PM
> To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] www_authorize()
>
>
> What exactly do you need to know ? The documentation is in
> sip_router/modules/auth_db/doc
>
> The function tries to verify user's credentials. It returns 1 if they
> are correct and -1 if not.
>
> Jan.
>
> On 09-07 14:24, Marcelo Schmidt wrote:
> > Could someone point me where I can read about this www_authorize()?
> >
> > Thanks.
> > --M
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Oh, sorry, I've misunderstood your problem. What kind of device UA1 is?
Can you please try the same with ATAs on both ends?
-Maxim
Ricardo Villa wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Sorry but I don't understand what you mean. Ser and RTP Proxy are on a
> machine with IP Address=192.168.1.111. The WAN interface of the NAT Router
> is 192.168.1.1. What exactly should I do?
>
> UA1---SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)----ATA186(192.168.0
> .15)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ricardo
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com>
> To: "Ricardo Villa" <ricvil(a)epm.net.co>
> Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>; <serdev(a)lists.iptel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
>
>
>
>>Try to bind both ser and rtpproxy to the IP address of "WAN" interface -
>>192.168.0.1 and let me know if it helps or not.
>>
>>-Maxim
>>
>>Ricardo Villa wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi Maxim,
>>>
>>>I have tested on 0.8.12dev-t10 installed on RedHat 7.3.
>>>
>>>The results are mixed. Only about 40% of the calls have audio even
>
> though
>
>>>the SDP is rewritten properly.
>>>
>>>My test setup is like this:
>>>
>>>UA1(192.168.1.10) --
>>>SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)--ATA186(192.168.0.15)
>>>
>>>I have included the "-f" output from the rtpproxy plus 4 ngrep files.
>>>
>>>1. success_from_internet.txt --> good call from UA1 to ATA186
>>>2. fail_from_internet.txt ---> no audio call from UA1 to ATA186
>>>3. success_from_nat.txt ----> good call from ATA186 to UA1
>>>4. fail_from_nat.txt ---> no audio call from ATA186 to UA1
>>>
>>>Please let me know how else we can troubleshoot this.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Ricardo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com>
>>>To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
>>>Cc: <serdev(a)lists.iptel.org>
>>>Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 12:16 PM
>>>Subject: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Folks,
>>>>
>>>>Today I've updated nathelper module to support RTP proxy. It would
>>>>be nice if somebody can test it on platforms other than FreeBSD,
>>>>because I don't have an access to such boxes right now. The RTP
>>>>proxy itself can be downloaded from:
>>>>
>>>>https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/PortaSIP/rtpproxy/
>>>>
>>>>Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>>-Maxim
>>>>P.S. I've committed it to the HEAD, those with 0.8.11 prerelease
>>>>please apply the following patch:
>>>>
>>>>https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/nathelper.diff
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Serusers mailing list
>>>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Serusers mailing list
>>>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
I am trying to find out why users get 401. This simple error got me.
Server realm is siptest.corp.equinix.com so if
(!www_authorize("siptest.corp.equinix.com", "subscriber")) {...}
The table subscriber, domain: displaying localhost. It should read
siptest.corp.equinix.com.
Based on the code under modules/auth sip gets stripped and ha1 creates:
gen_ha1 marcelo localhost sermarcelo
2686e9018da810053455be71a35d6928
In subscriber ha1: 2686e9018da810053455be71a35d6928 (all OK so far with
ha1)
But I forgot when I installed this version for some reason
SIP_DOMAIN=localhost SO NEVER DO THAT! :)
--M
Btw: I am running ser 0.8.11pre29 (i386/netbsd) so far w/mysql all OK.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:36 PM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] www_authorize()
What exactly do you need to know ? The documentation is in
sip_router/modules/auth_db/doc
The function tries to verify user's credentials. It returns 1 if they
are correct and -1 if not.
Jan.
On 09-07 14:24, Marcelo Schmidt wrote:
> Could someone point me where I can read about this www_authorize()?
>
> Thanks.
> --M
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
There is currently no such config option. I introduced
a "db_localtime" option to devel version of acc module --
if turned on, localtime is used instead.
-jiri
At 10:38 AM 7/9/2003, Andrzej Radke wrote:
>Hello all !
>I would like to change the time zone in time column in acc table
>in database ser. Nowaydays it is a UTC(GMT)
>Field timestamp in this same table is in my local zone CET
>Is some way to change it ? Some parameter in modules
>included in ser.cfg (acc.so) ?
>
>Greetings
>Andrzej Radke
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Hi!
I'm novice at SIP technology and I have some questions about it.
When we speak about "application server" in SIP (SER may acts as AS)
what does it means? Is it server which siply launch external
applications (internal module or fork & exec) to rewrite SIP/SDP packet
and forward it to next hop or something else?
For example if I want to write application which accept external call,
make some decisions on it and then make external call. Is it suitable
for SER or I must write something like B2BUA and start it as independed
application (as UA from the point of view of SER) ?
Thanks for advise!
