sr-users January 2004

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

142 participants
338 discussions

Re: [Serusers] Multiple Domain
by kapil dhawan 31 Jan '04

31 Jan '04

Hi Again... Set modparam("usrloc|registrar", "use_domain", "1"). Then the lookup will honor the domain as well. i got this ....but there is one problem while saving in location table....only username is saved...domain name doesn't get saved....so how will that work _________________________________________________________________ Contact brides & grooms FREE! http://www.shaadi.com/ptnr.php?ptnr=hmltag Only on www.shaadi.com. Register now!

1 0

Re: [Serusers] RE: Multiple Domain (kapil dhawan)
by kapil dhawan 31 Jan '04

31 Jan '04

Hi i am attaching my file here # # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.21.4.1 2003/11/10 15:35:15 andrei Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ #debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) #fork=yes #log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) /* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode debug=7 fork=no log_stderror=yes */ check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) #port=5060 #children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/domain.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/call.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/vm.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) modparam("domain", "db_url", "sql://root:root@localhost/ser") modparam("domain", "db_mode", 1) # Use chaching modparam("domain", "domain_table", "domain") modparam("domain", "domain_col", "domain") # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if ( msg:len > max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol record_route(); # loose-route processing if (loose_route()) { t_relay(); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (is_from_local()) { if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication if (!www_authorize("", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("", "0"); break; }; save("location"); break; }; if (method=="INVITE") { if(!call()){ break; }; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; # forward to current uri now; use stateful forwarding; that # works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } This file says that i am using domain table.....using authentication with blank parameters..... This all is clear to me...but my problem is...when we add user 111 with domain a.com and 111 with b.com....so while at the time of registration......serctl ul_show shows only one record (the first record which got registered) and when u try to make call...call is one way.....lets say 111(a)a.com registered first and then 111@b.com.....in that case 111(a)b.com can call 111(a)a.com but not vice-versa.....i am writing one module for the same......and got some luck also...but still like to know that do you have anything whihc can save my lots of time here...... regards >From: Jan Janak <jan(a)iptel.org> >To: kapil dhawan <oswriter(a)hotmail.com> >CC: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >Subject: Re: [Serusers] RE: Multiple Domain (kapil dhawan) >Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 02:02:04 +0100 > >Set modparam("usrloc|registrar", "use_domain", "1"). Then the lookup >will honor the domain as well. > > Jan. > >On 30-01 17:35, kapil dhawan wrote: > > Hi... > > > > i got the point of using domain table i am already using it..that is to > > check for multiple domain verification only.....but for eg...if i add >two > > users with username 111 with domain as a.com and b.com....it does in > > subscriber table with username as 111 and domains as a.com and > > b.com....this all is fine....when 111(a)a.com tries to call like >111#...what > > will happen...call only goes for last registration done...coz in >location > > structure , it doesn't add the latest entry of 111(a)b.com.... > > > > whenever u make a call it searches for the first record in location >table > > and call goes to it...so > > > > 111 a.com > > 111 b.com if the entries are like this....b.com can call a.com but not > > vice-versa... > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Play the prediction game on MEZ. Win Sehwag?s autographed T-shirts. > > http://go.msnserver.com/IN/41491.asp Predict and win on myenjoyzone.com. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers _________________________________________________________________ Contact brides & grooms FREE! http://www.shaadi.com/ptnr.php?ptnr=hmltag Only on www.shaadi.com. Register now!

1 0

Re: [Serusers] [jcollins@asgardsrealm.net: Routing difference between 0.8.10 and 0.8.12]
by Jan Janak 31 Jan '04

31 Jan '04

I looked at the attached dumps. First of all, 0.8.10 and 0.8.12 handle record routing differently. 0.8.10 implements strict routing while 0.8.12 implements loose routing. The bug is in your script. Because 0.8.12 implements loose routing, the Request-URI will contain the Contact of the callee. The Contact contains the number of the callee -- 5803932. In your script you are searching for numbers beginning with 580 and rewrite the hostname to a gateway. ACK and BYE will also contain the number in the Request-URI -- see above, but they don't contain the IP of your server in the Request-URI -- the IP of the callee is there. But you don't check this and rewrite anyway. The proper solution would be to search for numbers beginning with 580 inside the if (uri==myself) condition. BTW, all searches and rewrites of Request-URI should be inside uri==myself condition -- the condition will be true only for requests establishing a dialog. The Request-URI of requests WITHIN a dialog (BYE, ACK) must not be changed. In addition to that 0.8.10 and 0.8.12 configs are different. Your config for 0.8.10 doesn't use record routing while the config for 0.8.12 does. Jan. On 17-12 10:19, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > I sent the following message to to the serteam address per (Jiri's > request) several days ago regarding an apparent routing difference > between 0.8.10 and 0.8.12. I've yet to receive any indication that it > was received and/or that anyone is looking into this. > > I'm reposting it here (with configs and traces) in hopes that someone > here can either indicate what I've done wrong or confirm that these two > configurations should work the same. > > ----- Forwarded message from "Jamin W. Collins" <jcollins(a)asgardsrealm.net> ----- > > From: "Jamin W. Collins" <jcollins(a)asgardsrealm.net> > To: serteam(a)iptel.org > > I believe I've found a routing difference between 0.8.10 and 0.8.12. I > originally brought this up on the serusers list[1]. Jiri has suggested > that I forward the configurations and ngrep captures to this address, > you should find these attached to this message. The ngrep capture from > 20031204 contains the Snom phone's request against the 0.8.10 > configuration. The 20031205 capture contains a Snom and Cisco request > against the 0.8.12 configuration. The Snom phone works as expected > against the 0.8.10 configuration, but not he 0.8.12. The Cisco phone > works as expected against the 0.8.12 configuration. > > [1] - http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2003-December/004272.html > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > -- > Jamin W. Collins > > This is the typical unix way of doing things: you string together lots > of very specific tools to accomplish larger tasks. -- Vineet Kumar

3 11

[Serusers] RE: Multiple Domain (kapil dhawan)
by kapil dhawan 31 Jan '04

31 Jan '04

Hi... i got the point of using domain table i am already using it..that is to check for multiple domain verification only.....but for eg...if i add two users with username 111 with domain as a.com and b.com....it does in subscriber table with username as 111 and domains as a.com and b.com....this all is fine....when 111(a)a.com tries to call like 111#...what will happen...call only goes for last registration done...coz in location structure , it doesn't add the latest entry of 111(a)b.com.... whenever u make a call it searches for the first record in location table and call goes to it...so 111 a.com 111 b.com if the entries are like this....b.com can call a.com but not vice-versa... _________________________________________________________________ Play the prediction game on MEZ. Win Sehwags autographed T-shirts. http://go.msnserver.com/IN/41491.asp Predict and win on myenjoyzone.com.

2 1

[Serusers] Hey guys.
by Atle Samuelsen 31 Jan '04

31 Jan '04

Iv got a dialpad subscription, do you know if its possible to connect this up my ser gateway, and make outgoing calls via a prefix? I know you kan just rewritehostport. but what about username and passwords and stuff like that .. - Atle

2 1

[Serusers] Multiple Domain
by kapil dhawan 31 Jan '04

31 Jan '04

Hi All..... I am not sure whether i am posting my query at right place... Well i am using ser-0.8.12. i want to allow mulpile domains....but i don't want to do changes in .cfg file whenever a new domain is added...and i even don't want to write script to add location to different location tables...depending upon the uri.....i want to use one subscriber and one location table.....How can this be done _________________________________________________________________ Sports buff? This hot new channel is for you! http://www.msn.co.in/sports/ Get on the inside of all the action!

2 1

[Serusers] serctl alias not working
by Gregory D. Burns 31 Jan '04

31 Jan '04

Guys, I'm using Mysql and serctl Revision: 1.62. Add user works finded, but the add alias does not seem to be working, as you can see below. serctl alias add 0112132337000 sip:2011@66.159.236.42 sip:2011@66.159.236.42 200 Added to table ('0112132337000','sip:2011@66.159.236.42') to 'aliases' [root@home root]# serctl alias show 0112132337000 404 No registered contacts found I enabed FIFO_DBG in serctl "FIFO_DBG=1" and got. serctl alias add 0112132337000 sip:2011@66.159.236.42 sip:2011@66.159.236.42 entering fifo_cmd ul_add aliases 0112132337000 sip:2011@66.159.236.42 1073741823 1.00 0 200 Added to table ('0112132337000','sip:2011@66.159.236.42') to 'aliases' FIFO command was: :ul_add:ser_receiver_26630 aliases 0112132337000 sip:2011@66.159.236.42 1073741823 1.00 0 [root@home root]# serctl alias show 0112132337000 entering fifo_cmd ul_show_contact aliases 0112132337000 404 No registered contacts found FIFO command was: :ul_show_contact:ser_receiver_26639 aliases 0112132337000 How do I trouble shoot this more? Any ideas? -Greg

2 1

[Serusers] Returned mail: see transcript for details
by Mail Delivery Subsystem 30 Jan '04

30 Jan '04

The original message was received at Sat, 31 Jan 2004 07:17:36 +0900 (JST) from root@localhost ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- ray(a)jp.panasonic.com (reason: 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias: ray(a)jp.panasonic.com) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to smtpproxy.jp.panasonic.com.: >>> RCPT To:<ray(a)jp.panasonic.com> <<< 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias: ray(a)jp.panasonic.com 550 5.1.1 ray(a)jp.panasonic.com... User unknown

1 0

[Serusers] Selective t_on_failure ?
by Andres 30 Jan '04

30 Jan '04

Hi, We have a setup where there is a main SER server and an alternate SER server. They both replicate all registrations to each other. We are using the "t_on_failure" directive to send INVITES to the other server when it fails the first attempt (this may happen because there was a failure on the replication or because the called user is behind a "restricted cone" or "port restricted cone" NAT and he had registered on the other server--- we use STUN BTW). In any case, this setup works relatively well, but we would like to fine tune it a bit. In the case where the called user is BUSY. We would like to implement some logic in ser.cfg so that "t_on_failure" does not spit the INVITE again to the alternate server. Something like: if (user is busy) then send STATUS 486 to caller, else if (some other failure) then send INVITE to alternate server Is this possible? Our problem is that we are getting an increasing number of complaints from users saying they just hear "dead air" on their phone for a long time. Ethereal traces show that this happens because the first INVITE gets a STATUS 486 (user is busy) so the SER server sends the INVITE again to the alternate. But the alternate cannot reach the end user because he is behind a "resticted cone" NAT and that user is registered on the main server, hence the "fr_timer" kicks in and the caller just hears "dead air" for a while, until finaly he gets a 408 - Request Timeout. Thanks. -- Andres Network Admin http://www.telesip.net

2 3

[Serusers] add alias of ser
by jey 30 Jan '04

30 Jan '04

Hello, I'm new in SER, after installed ser 0.8.12 cvs versions, I try to add alias to a user, but I met a problem. After I type: serctl alias add 8040 sip:jeytest@voip.orzar.net It' shows: sip:jeytest@voip.orzar.net 400 Table 'aliases' not found in memory, use save("aliases") or lookup("aliases") in the configuration script first I'm sure I have lookup("aliases"); in my /etc/ser/ser.cfg file, and I did edit serctl script FOREVER_REL=1073741823 to FOREVER_REL=1003741823 follow by http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-January/004949.html . Thanks, Jey

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users January 2004