sr-users October 2004

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

189 participants
408 discussions

[Serusers] ser auth_raidus problem radius_authorize_sterman(

by Decebal Topala

Hi there i have compiled the ser with auth_radius module. During my test in the log i can see that i get: res: -1 3(25958) radius_authorize_sterman(): Failure 3(25958) build_auth_hf(): 'WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="209.250.135.8", nonce="4175e8b266ce69371b9d12a6b69c4ce3b541b313"^M i did followed everything in the FAQ and radius documentation .. But for some reason i cannot get through this problem. the radius client is the 0.4.5 but it does not help. Another issue is that i run radius -X and nothing ... nothing is showing on the log ??? when i run radtest as in document ion i do get the log ... in the radius .. If any one know where i did get stuck ??? please let me know Thanks

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] ser+nathelper+rtpproxy / can't read reply from a RTP proxy

by Akira OKUBO

Hi, I have just installed ser this week. It's very cool and happy to find FreeBSD port of it. Anyway, I have rtp proxy connection problem of ser+nathelper+rtpproxy system. To refer console log, it seems no communication between ser and rtpproxy. Does anyone know how to fix it? ------ gw# /usr/local/sbin/ser -D -E -Listening on : : stateless - initializing Maxfwd module- initializing 0(47772) mod_init(): Database connection opened successfuly textops - initializing 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 41600 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 231936 0(0) WARNING: using only the first listen address (no fork) 2(47774) INFO: fifo process starting: 47774 1(47773) ERROR: send_rtpp_command: can't read reply from a RTP proxy 1(47773) 2(47774) WARNING: rtpp_test: can't get version of the RTP proxy ERROR: send_rtpp_command: can't read reply from a RTP proxy 1(47773) 2(47774) WARNING: rtpp_test: support for RTP proxyhas been disabled temporarily ------ Here is my environmnet: OS : FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p2 ser version: ser 0.8.14-2 (i386/freebsd) get stable version from CVS, since port version is still 0.8.12... nathelper : get from CVS 14-Oct-2004 I run ser and rtpporoxy as root user to avoid permission issue. and /var/run looks no problem. srwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Oct 15 14:53 rtpproxy.sock ---- # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) #fork=yes #log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) ----- /* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode */ fork=no log_stderror=yes check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" #fifo_mode=0666 ### temporary for ser to write/read /var/run/rtpproxy.sock #uid="nobody" #gid="nobody" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" # !! Nathelper loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "sql://ser:ser@localhost/ser") #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # !! Nathelper modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping interval 30 s modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT : : : Thanks in advance! *~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~* Akira Okubo <akira(a)access-sys-eu.com>

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] exec_dst implementation problem

by Darren Nay

I am having problems getting exec_dst to work correctly. I am loading the module, but every time that I attempt to start SER I am getting an error saying that I haven't loaded the module. I am using the latest stable SER 0.8.14 - downloaded from CVS today. Here are snipets from my SER.CFG. loading the module.... ----- loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/exec.so" ----- calling exec_dst.... ----- #exec external app to determine dest URI if (exec_dst("/usr/local/sbin/sip-route")) { route(1); break; }; ----- The error that I am getting is... ----- 0(20149) parse error (161,57-58): unknown command, missing loadmodule? ----- Line 161 in my ser.cfg file is the "exec_dst" line shown in my snipet above. I have verified that the exec.so module exists, and have even tried recompiling / reinstalling it. Any suggestions? Thanks! Darren Nay _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] Warning header mandatory ?

by Leon de Rooij

Hi, I have a Comtrend SIP UA here and it breaks when I have 'sip_warning=yes' in ser.cfg. It doesn't like the warning header to be too long. I couldn't find anywhere in the SIP RFC's whether there is a maximum length to this header. When I set sip_warning to no, the UA works fine, however I think I read somewhere once that this warning header is sometimes mandatory. Can someone confirm or deny that ? Thanks, Leon de Rooij leon(a)scarlet-internet.nl

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] RE: INVITE change by Radius Authorization

by Ricardo Martinez

Anyone who can help me with this issue? Best Regards Ricardo > -----Mensaje original----- > De: Ricardo Martinez > Enviado el: Lunes, 18 de Octubre de 2004 12:04 > Para: 'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org' > Asunto: INVITE change by Radius Authorization > > Hello List. > I'm using SER as my SIP platform, i'm still using it in a lab > enviroment, i need to solve some issues before move it to a "normal" > enviroment. > What i want to do is make some changes in the authorization of a call. > Now, when a INVITE arrives to my SER platform the user is challenged by > radius in my DB. This is done by the : radius_proxy_authorize. For the > other hand I'm able to return any parameter in the radius Access-Response > message. So, here is my question: Is possible for SER to "understand" > this access-response and the parameters that contains in it?. For example > is possible to return in a radius access-response a parameter called > "Redirect-Number" that changes the original dialed number by the user for > another number?. In a diagram may look like this :(this is a very easy > example) > > > User dial 00-562-2408190 ----------- Challenged with Radius -------- > Radius Return Parameter Redirect-Number=56-2-2204567 ---- The call is > placed. > > Is possible to do this?. > Do i have to use maybe a exec module or something like this? > Any idea? > > Thanks in advace. > Best Regards > > Ricardo Martinez

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] [Serdev] tm module and voicemail of sems

by Robert C. Auch

What's the status of this problem from September? I can't find any info - using sems and ser from CVS 2 weeks ago. Separate question: when I move the loose-route processing further down in my ser.cfg (after the lookup(aliases); and if(uri==myself){stuff}; blocks), then my PBX gateway (multitech MVP130) drops calls after 1 minute as "unsuccessfull" - Multitech support says that the gateway isn't getting a certain "200 OK" message. I don't know SIP well enough to know exactly what's up there - has anyone heard of this, or do I get to find a hub so I can sniff out the traffic going to the MVP130? Rob From:Jan Janak jan at iptel.org Date: Wed Sep 15 15:28:53 CEST 2004 Subject: [Serdev] tm module and voicemail of sems Hello, t_write_req currently does not work voicemail properly because some parts (to load the email from the dabase) seem to be missing. We will fix it asap, sorry for the inconvenience. Jan. On 15-09 17:09, Zhang Wei wrote: > hello, > My ser does not work well with voicemail of sems. No email address is passed to sems . In ser.cfg I wrote : > ------------------------------------------------- > > if( is_user_in("Request-URI", "voicemail")){ > log(1, "yes,incoming voicemail call\n"); > if(!t_write_req("/tmp/am_fifo","voicemail")){ > log("could not contact voicemail server\n"); > t_reply("500","could not contact voicemail serv > }; > } > --------------------------------------------------------------- > and the part debug information of sems is : > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > (21112) DEBUG: execute (AmServer.cpp:226): cmd.method= <INVITE> > (21112) DEBUG: execute (AmServer.cpp:227): cmd.user= <zhangwei> > (21112) DEBUG: execute (AmServer.cpp:228): cmd.email= <> > ...... > > (21112) DEBUG: execute (AmServer.cpp:276): everything is OK ! > (21112) ERROR: startSession (AmSession.cpp:458): 404 voicemail: no email address for user <zhangwei> > (21112) DEBUG: sendToFIFO (AmRequest.cpp:230): msg=<:t_reply:0000527827DE965E > 404 > voicemail: no email address for user <zhangwei> > 5491:1720953846 > 000052782F008C5D > Contact: <sip:zhangwei at 210.51.11.47> > . > ------------------------------------------------------ > In source code, t_write_req()-->assemble_msg()-->search_first_avp() > In search_first_avp function of usr_avp.c : > ------------------------------------------------------ > struct usr_avp *avp; > > assert( crt_avps!=0 ); > > if (*crt_avps==0) > return 0; -------------------->return > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Why ???

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] ser and rtpproxy

by mohammad mirzaee

HI All; I have the following network: cisco ATA (valid ip) ---------------------------ser+rtpproxy---------------------------quintum GW(valid ip) 62.220.101.8 62.220.101.2 62.220.101.3 I want to pass media via ser+rtpproxy, ser can communicate with rtpproxy via unix socket sucessfully. The problem is when i call from ATA to quintum the voice path is one way??????????/ My SER.CFG and RTPPROXYLOG are as follows: # # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.21.4.1 2003/11/10 15:35:15 andrei Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ #debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) #fork=yes #log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) /* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode debug=7 fork=no log_stderror=yes */ check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) #port=5060 #children=4 #fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" #loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # #modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # #modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if ( msg:len > max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol record_route(); # loose-route processing if (loose_route()) { t_relay(); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { log(1, "REQUEST FOR SERVED DOMAIN------------------"); if (uri=~"^sip:3000@ 62.220.101.2"){ *********************SER VALID IP ADDRESS*********************** rewritehost("62.220.101.3");****************************QUINTUM VALID IP ADDRESS********************** force_rtp_proxy(); log(1, "-------MEDIA IS BEINGED PROXIED--------------"); forward(62.220.101.3, 5060);********************************QUINTUM VALID IP ADD************************** break; }; #we forwad to current uri now; use stateful forwarding; that # works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++RTYPROXY DEBUG LOG+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ # rtpproxy -2f -l 62.220.101.2 -s unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock -t 40 rtpproxy: rtpproxy started, pid 18398 rtpproxy: new session 633554326(a)62.220.101.8, tag 3269848300 requested rtpproxy: new session on a port 35000 created, tag 3269848300 rtpproxy: pre-filling caller's address with 62.220.101.8:16384 rtpproxy: session timeout rtpproxy: RTP stats: 0 in from callee, 0 in from caller, 0 relayed, 0 dropped rtpproxy: RTCP stats: 0 in from callee, 0 in from caller, 0 relayed, 0 dropped rtpproxy: session on ports 35000/0 is cleaned up Appreciate any suggections mohammad

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] Sip-To-Tag and Sip-From-Tag in radius accounting

by Tor Setane

Hi, when I make a call from UserA to UserB and UserB hangs up first, the Sip-To-Tag and Sip-From-Tag is switching place in radius stop report compared to the start report. This only seems to happen with calls between "on-net" phones. If the call is routed to the gw, this does not happen. Does anyone know if this is normal behavior? I'm using ser 0.8.12 and radiusclient 0.3.2. Regards, Tor

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] Prepaid Billing Issues

by aimable

Can you try Asterisk calling card platform? I use SER as a proxy server, all phones connected to it and uses asterisk as a gateway to the pstn and GSM network. So far the Asterisk calling card works fine. http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-print.php?page=ASTCC

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] where to abtain mysql modules?need help!

by lilingling

Does the "ser-0.8.18.src.tar.gz" distribution includes "mysql" related modules ? I just can't find "mysql.so" in usr/local/lib/ser/modules. Any help would be appreciated !

20 years, 1 month

← Newer
1
...
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
...
41
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users October 2004