sr-users October 2004

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

189 participants
408 discussions

[Serusers] Question about Radius and SER. PLease HELP.

by Ricardo Martinez

Hello list. I'm using Radius to make the AAA in my SIP platform. For authentication i have no problem, for authorization no problem. When i get the Accounting of a call i have a issue I don't know why i'm obtaining two START messages. One with Sip-Method=1 and the other with Sip-Method=4. The two messages arrives at the same time when the call is answered. Is this normal? Thanks in advance Ricardo Martinez

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] flatstore.so modification suggestion

by Java Rockx

Hello All. flatstore works great but does anyone know if it is possible to store completed calls in a flat store and missed calls in MySQL? The reason is simple; CDRs generally need moved to a billing system whereas missed call records are informative only and usually get deleted periodically. >From a serweb point of view, missed calls are handy especially with click-to-dial. It would be really nice if the acc module allowed CDRs and missed calls to have different persistent storage locations. Thoughts anyone? Paul __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Messenger - Communicate in real time. Download now. http://messenger.yahoo.com

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] ser 8.1.14 not talking to radius server on fedora core2 ?

by Decebal Topala

Any one is successful with this configuration: ser 8.1.14 + radiusclient 0.4.4. Just wanted to See if any one is getting the same symptoms as i get. It looks like my ser+ radisuclient 0.4.4 is not talking at all to the radius server but in the ser log i am getting following: "Some message with credentials for given realm not found " I have submitted a message with all the logs but it is waiting for approval .. I am submitting another shorter one. ) 3(3923) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of uri: <sip:209.250 3(3923) DEBUG: a version: <SIP/2.0> 4(3927) parse_headers: flags=1 3(3923) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroing list (nil) 3(3923) receive_msg: cleaning up 4(3927) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK4d5b.c80b2f83.0>; state=16 4(3927) end of header reached, state=5 4(3927) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 4(3927) parse_headers: this is the first via 4(3927) After parse_msg... 4(3927) preparing to run routing scripts... 4(3927) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: max_forward header already found! 4(3927) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 10 4(3927) parse_headers: flags=8 4(3927) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7210a8d8>; state=16 4(3927) end of header reached, state=5 4(3927) parse_headers: Via found, flags=8 4(3927) parse_headers: this is the second via 4(3927) DEBUG: add_param: tag=as0854885b 4(3927) end of header reached, state=29 4(3927) query="select domain from domain where domain='209.250.135.8'" 4(3927) is_local(): Realm '209.250.135.8' is local 4(3927) XLOG: xl_print_log: final buffer length 31 4(3927) <REGISTER> == is from local == 4(3927) parse_headers: flags=64 4(3927) end of header reached, state=9 4(3927) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [32]; uri=[sip:4169878025@209.250.135.8] 4(3927) DEBUG: to body [<sip:4169878025@209.250.135.8> ] 4(3927) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <102> <REGISTER> 4(3927) check_via_address(209.250.135.8, 209.250.135.8, 2) 4(3927) parse_headers: flags=4096 4(3927) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 4(3927) found end of header 4(3927) pre_auth(): Credentials with given realm not found 4(3927) build_auth_hf(): 'WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="209.250.135.8", nonce="4172b0334c46e8aaf44360a02eef199553852c7e" ' 4(3927) parse_headers: flags=-1 4(3927) check_via_address(209.250.135.8, 209.250.135.8, 2) 4(3927) DEBUG: get_out_socket: socket determined: 1 3(3923) SIP Reply (status): 3(3923) version: <SIP/2.0> 3(3923) status: <401> 3(3923) reason: <Unauthorized> 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=1 3(3923) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK4d5b.c80b2f83.0>; state=16 3(3923) end of header reached, state=5 3(3923) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 3(3923) parse_headers: this is the first via 3(3923) After parse_msg... 3(3923) check_self - checking if host==us: 13==9 && [209.250.135.8] == [127.0.0.1] 3(3923) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 3(3923) check_self - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [209.250.135.8] == [209.250.135.8] 3(3923) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 3(3923) forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it 3(3923) DEBUG: t_check: msg id=2 global id=1 T start=0xffffffff 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=17 3(3923) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7210a8d8>; state=16 3(3923) end of header reached, state=5 3(3923) parse_headers: Via found, flags=17 3(3923) parse_headers: this is the second via 3(3923) DEBUG: add_param: tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.8dd9 3(3923) end of header reached, state=29 3(3923) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [74]; uri=[sip:4169878025@209.250.135.8] 3(3923) DEBUG: to body [<sip:4169878025@209.250.135.8>] 3(3923) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <102> <REGISTER> 3(3923) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: hash 46548 label 955429004 branch 0 3(3923) DEBUG: t_reply_matching: reply matched (T=0xf51e20b0)! 3(3923) DEBUG: t_check: msg id=2 global id=2 T end=0xf51e20b0 4(3927) radius_does_uri_exist(): Failure 3(3923) 4(3927) DEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=1 , globDEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 3(3923) old size: 696, new size: 634 3(3923) build_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:88, new: 26, rest: 608 msg= SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.196.87.34:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7210a8d8 From: <sip:4169878025@209.250.135.8>;tag=as0854885b To: <sip:4169878025@209.250.135.8>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.8dd9 Call-ID: 02d1489e1d18e2f93d240ea127012cd8(a)192.168.1.1 CSeq: 102 REGISTER WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="209.250.135.8", nonce="4172b0334c46e8aaf44360a02eef199553852c7e" Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.14-2 (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 0 Warning: 392 209.250.135.8:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=3927 req_src_ip=209.250.135.8 req_src_port=5060 in_uri=sip:209.250.135.8 out_uri=sip:209.250.135.8 via_cnt==2" 3(3923) WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called 4(3927) DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed 3(3923) DEBUG: reDEBUG: get_out_socket: socket determined: 1 mem=0xf51e35c0: SIP/2.0 4 3(3923) 4(3927) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup... 923) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0xf51e20f8 3(3923) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroing list (nil) 4(3927) DEBUG: get_out_socket: socket determined: 1 4(3927) check_via_address(209.250.135.8, 209.250.135.8, 2) 3(3923) SIP Request: 3(3923) method: <REGISTER> 3(3923) uri: <sip:209.250.135.8> 3(3923) version: <SIP/2.0> 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=1 3(3923) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK4d5b.d80b2f83.0>; state=16 3(3923) end of header reached, state=5 3(3923) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 3(3923) parse_headers: this is the first via 3(3923) After parse_msg... 3(3923) preparing to run routing scripts... 3(3923) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: max_forward header already found! 3(3923) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 9 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=8 3(3923) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK4d5b.c80b2f83.0>; state=16 3(3923) end of header reached, state=5 3(3923) parse_headers: Via found, flags=8 3(3923) parse_headers: this is the second via 3(3923) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7210a8d8>; state=16 3(3923) end of header reached, state=5 3(3923) parse_headers: Via found, flags=8 3(3923) DEBUG: add_param: tag=as0854885b 3(3923) end of header reached, state=29 3(3923) query="select domain from domain where domain='209.250.135.8'" 3(3923) is_local(): Realm '209.250.135.8' is local 3(3923) XLOG: xl_print_log: final buffer length 31 3(3923) <REGISTER> == is from local == 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=64 3(3923) end of header reached, state=9 3(3923) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [32]; uri=[sip:4169878025@209.250.135.8] 3(3923) DEBUG: to body [<sip:4169878025@209.250.135.8> ] 3(3923) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <102> <REGISTER> 3(3923) check_via_address(209.250.135.8, 209.250.135.8, 2) 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=4096 3(3923) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 3(3923) found end of header 3(3923) pre_auth(): Credentials with given realm not found 3(3923) build_auth_hf(): 'WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="209.250.135.8", nonce="4172b0334c46e8aaf44360a02eef199553852c7e" ' 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=-1 3(3923) check_via_address(209.250.135.8, 209.250.135.8, 2) 3(3923) DEBUG: get_out_socket: socket determined: 1 4(3927) SIP Reply (status): 4(3927) version: <SIP/2.0> 4(3927) status: <401> 4(3927) reason: <Unauthorized> 4(3927) parse_headers: flags=1 4(3927) Found param type 232, <br 3(3923) find_first_route(): No Route headers found 3(3923) loose_route(): There is no Routparse 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=64 3(3923) check_via_address(209.250.135.8, 209.250.1After parse_msg... 4(3927) check_self - checking if host==us: 13==9 && [209.250.135.8] == [127.0.0.1] 4(3927) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 4(3927) check_self - checking if host==us: 13==13 && [209.250.135.8] == [209.250.135.8] 4(3927) check_self - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 4(3927) forward_reply: found module tm, passing reply to it 4(3927) DEBUG: t_check: msg id=2 global id=1 T start=0xffffffff 4(3927) parse_headers: flags=17 4(3927) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK4d5b.c80b2f83.0>; state=16 4(3927) end of header reached, state=5 4(3927) parse_headers: Via found, flags=17 4(3927) parse_headers: this is the second via 4(3927) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7210a8d8>; state=16 4(3927) end of header reached, state=5 4(3927) parse_headers: Via found, flags=17 4(3927) DEBUG: add_param: tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.d295 4(3927) end of heradius_does_uri_exist() 4(3927) DEBUG: geDEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=3 , global msg id=2 , T on entranc 4(3927) DEBUG: to bodparse_headers: flags=-1 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=60 3(3923) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=46548, isACK=0 : hash 46548 label 955429005 branch 0 4(3927) DEBUG: t_DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed 3(3923) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found 0xf51e3848 4(3927) DEBUG: t_on_reply: org. status uas=0, uac[0]=0 local=0 is_invite=0) 4(3927) ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=401 4(3927) 3(3923) DEBUG: get_out_socket: socket determined: 1 3(3923) DEBUG: mkbuild_res_from_sip_res: copied size: orig:88, new: 26, rest: 670 msg= SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 209.250.135.8;branch=z9hG4bK4d5b.c80b2f83.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 69.196.87.34:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7210a8d8 From: <sip:4169878025@209.250.135.8>;tag=as0854885b To: <sip:4169878025@209.250.135.8>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.d295 Call-ID: 02d1489e1d18e2f93d240ea127012cd8(a)192.168.1.1 CSeq: 102 REGISTER WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="209.250.135.8", nonce="4172b0334c46e8aaf44360a02eef199553852c7e" Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.14-2 (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 0 Warning: 392 209.250.135.8:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=3923 req_src_ip=209.250.135.8 req_src_port=5060 in_uri=sip:209.250.135.8 out_uri=sip:209.250.135.8 via_cnt==3" 4(3927) 3(3923) DEBUG: get_out_socket: socket determined: 1 3(3923) check_via_address(209.250.135.8, 209.250.135.8, 2) shmem=0xf51e6360: SIP/2.0 4 4(3927) DEBUG: cleanup_uacs: RETR/FR timers reset 4(3927) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[2]: 0xf51e3890 4(3927) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroing list (nil 3 4(3927DEreceive_msg: cleaning up [0]: 0xf51e4fa4 3(3923) 4(3927) SIP Reply (status): 4(3927) version: <SIP/2.0> 4(3927) status: <401> 3(3923) SIP Request: 3(3923) method: <REGISTER> 4(3927) Found par uri: <sip:209.250.135.8> 3(3923) version: <SIP/2.0> 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=1 3(3923) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK4d5b.e80b2f83.0>; state=16 3(3923) end of header reached, state=5 3(3923) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1 3(3923) parse_headers: this is the first via 3(3923) After parse_msg... 3(3923) preparing to run routing scripts... 3(3923) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: max_forward header already found! 3(3923) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 8 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=8 4(3927) Found parFound param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK4d5b.d80b2f 4(3927) end of header reend of header r 4(3927) parse_headers: Vparse_headers: Via 4(3927) parse_ 3(3923) parse_headers: this is the seconDEBUG: 3(3923) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK4d5b.c80b2f83end of header 3(3923) end of header reacDEBUG: get_hd 3(3923) parse_headers: Via found, flags=8 3(3923) Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK7210a8d8>; state=16 3(3923) end of header reached, state=5 3(3923) parse_headers: Via found, flags=8 3(3923) DEBUG: add_param: tag=as0854885b 3(3923) end of header reached, state=29 tched (T=0xf51e20b0)! 4(3927) DEBUG: t_check: msg id=3 global id=3 T end=0xf51e20b0 4(3927) DEBUG: t_on_reply: org. status uas=401, uac[0]=401 local=0 is_invite=0) 4(3927) ->>>>>>>>> T_code=401, new_code=401 4(3927) DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=-1 4(3927) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroing list (nil) 4(3927) receive_msg: cleaning up 3(3923) is_local(): Realm '209.250.135.8' is local 3(3923) XLOG: xl_print_log: final buffer length 31 3(3923) <REGISTER> == is from local == 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=64 3(3923) end of header reached, state=9 3(3923) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [32]; uri=[sip:4169878025@209.250.135.8] 3(3923) DEBUG: to body [<sip:4169878025@209.250.135.8> ] 3(3923) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <102> <REGISTER> 3(3923) check_via_address(209.250.135.8, 209.250.135.8, 2) 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=4096 3(3923) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 3(3923) found end of header 3(3923) pre_auth(): Credentials with given realm not found 3(3923) build_auth_hf(): 'WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="209.250.135.8", nonce="4172b0334c46e8aaf44360a02eef199553852c7e" ' 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=-1 3(3923) check_via_address(209.250.135.8, 209.250.135.8, 2) 3(3923) DEBUG: get_out_socket: socket determined: 1 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=256 3(3923) find_first_route(): No Route headers found 3(3923) loose_route(): There is no Route HF 3(3923) parse_headers: flags=64 3(3923) check_via_address(209.250.135.8, 209.250.135.8, 2) 4(3927) SIP Reply (status): 4(3927) version: <SIP/2.0>

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] Prepaid Billing Issues (Third time)

by Nahuel Alejandro Ramos

Hi, I looking for a prepaid biiling solution for my SER. I have already read that I have to use B2BUA or Asterisk with some billing app. I have a Cisco 2610 with 2 FXO so the Asterisk would not talk with the PSTN directly. 1- First I ask you what is better and scalable to use? 2- How I loads or add credits to its DB? (I know that B2BUA use a Radius, so I would use FreeRadius+MySQL) 3- How B2BUA or Asterisk control not a user pass his credits? How they calc the credit-time-price_perminute, and make the user hang up a call? 4- Do you know a free billing app, make it in PHP/MySQL for an easy personalization? 5- THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!! Nahuel Ramos. P.D.: I post it again by third time because the maillist was not working right and I have not received it.

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] sems

by kcassidy＠kakelma.mine.nu

Hi, Does anyone have a sample config on playing annoucement in SEMS? What I'm trying to achieve is when a user dials some number (ex. 123), it will announce his number. I think sipphone got something like this when a user dials **. TIA.

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] flatstore.so question

by Java Rockx

Hello all. I'm using ser-dev.8.99-dev10 and I'm trying to get the flatstore module to work but I'm having a little trouble. I'd like to keep MySQL for everything except storing call records. Can anyone shoot me a ser.cfg snippet that shows how to use flatstore for CDRs? Regards, Paul _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] remove character

by kcassidy＠kakelma.mine.nu

Hi, Can anyone help me on how to remove certain charanters from the uri? I'm having problems with some phones sending the pound sign "#" sign. Is there a way to remove it in ser? Thanks.

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] INVITE change by Radius Authorization

by Ricardo Martinez

Hello List. I'm using SER as my SIP platform, i'm still using it in a lab enviroment, i need to solve some issues before move it to a "normal" enviroment. What i want to do is make some changes in the authorization of a call. Now, when a INVITE arrives to my SER platform the user is challenged by radius in my DB. This is done by the : radius_proxy_authorize. For the other hand I'm able to return any parameter in the radius Access-Response message. So, here is my question: Is possible for SER to "understand" this access-response and the parameters that contains in it?. For example is possible to return in a radius access-response a parameter called "Redirect-Number" that changes the original dialed number by the user for another number?. In a diagram may look like this :(this is a very easy example) User dial 00-562-2408190 ----------- Challenged with Radius -------- Radius Return Parameter Redirect-Number=56-2-2204567 ---- The call is placed. Is possible to do this?. Do i have to use maybe a exec module or something like this? Any idea? Thanks in advace. Best Regards Ricardo Martinez

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] Prepaid Billing Issue (Again)

by Nahuel Alejandro Ramos

20 years, 1 month

[Serusers] Prepaid Billing Issues

by Nahuel Alejandro Ramos

20 years, 1 month

← Newer
1
...
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
...
41
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users October 2004