Thanks. I forgot to mention that stuff. :-)
Paul
--- Walter Willis <walterwn(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> probe witn line in the ser.cfg
>
> fifo_mode=0666
>
> but dont think so.
> probe
> debug=9
> log_stderror=yes
> for debug
>
>
>
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 18:19:00 -0700 (PDT), Java Rockx
> <javarockx(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Clive,
> >
> > serusers_at_iptel.org should be included in the discussions for the benefit of the user base.
> >
> > Are you using MySQL? If so, did you perform these steps:
> >
> > * enable mysql in <ser-src>/modules/acc/Makefile and recompile
> > the acc module and copy acc.so to /usr/local/lib/ser/modules
> >
> > edit modules/acc/Makefile (remove hash on the line DEFS+=-DSQL_ACC)
> > cd <ser-src>
> > make modules=modules/acc modules
> > cp modules/acc/acc.so /usr/local/lib/ser/modules
> >
> > * compile the mysql module using
> >
> > cd <ser-src>
> > make modules=modules/mysql modules
> > cp modules/mysql/mysql.so /usr/local/lib/ser/modules
> >
> > * Add an alias using serctl. For example:
> >
> > NOTE: This assumes you really do have lookup("aliases") in ser.cfg
> >
> > serctl alias add 1000 sip:5551212@sip.mycompany.com
> >
> > Now you should be able execute "select * from aliases;" and see the new alias record.
> >
> > If you added the alias correctly (an all else worked) then you should be able to see the alias
> as
> > follows;
> >
> > serctl alias show 1000
> >
> > which should return something like this:
> > <sip:5551212@sip.mycompany.com>;q=1;expires=-90832
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Paul
> >
> > --- clive(a)phonehome.co.za wrote:
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Hi
> >
> > I hope you don't mind me emailling you.
> >
> > I am having a similar problem with alias's that you had, just that mine don't seem to even be
> > getting past the "go" mark.
> >
> > I put#160; "lookup("aliases");#160;#160; " into the ser.cfg file, and I have all the fifo
> > permissions correct.
> >
> > There does not seem to be any information in the database
> >
> > Do you have any pointers?
> >
> > Thanks and regards
> > Clive
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
> > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Clive,
serusers_at_iptel.org should be included in the discussions for the benefit of the user base.
Are you using MySQL? If so, did you perform these steps:
* enable mysql in <ser-src>/modules/acc/Makefile and recompile
the acc module and copy acc.so to /usr/local/lib/ser/modules
edit modules/acc/Makefile (remove hash on the line DEFS+=-DSQL_ACC)
cd <ser-src>
make modules=modules/acc modules
cp modules/acc/acc.so /usr/local/lib/ser/modules
* compile the mysql module using
cd <ser-src>
make modules=modules/mysql modules
cp modules/mysql/mysql.so /usr/local/lib/ser/modules
* Add an alias using serctl. For example:
NOTE: This assumes you really do have lookup("aliases") in ser.cfg
serctl alias add 1000 sip:5551212@sip.mycompany.com
Now you should be able execute "select * from aliases;" and see the new alias record.
If you added the alias correctly (an all else worked) then you should be able to see the alias as
follows;
serctl alias show 1000
which should return something like this:
<sip:5551212@sip.mycompany.com>;q=1;expires=-90832
Cheers,
Paul
--- clive(a)phonehome.co.za wrote:
---------------------------------
Hi
I hope you don't mind me emailling you.
I am having a similar problem with alias's that you had, just that mine don't seem to even be
getting past the "go" mark.
I put#160; "lookup("aliases");#160;#160; " into the ser.cfg file, and I have all the fifo
permissions correct.
There does not seem to be any information in the database
Do you have any pointers?
Thanks and regards
Clive
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Hi Users,
I am pretty new to SER and currently administrating an SER server for our
company. The problem I am facing is the fifo buffer gets filled up pretty
fast when traffic is more on the network, sometimes the buffer (waiting
list) gets so high tht the ser deamon crashes and the server stops, I also
get he following errors when I just restart the server.
Oct 29 14:29:13 sip /usr/sbin/ser[13883]: authorize(): Invalid nonce value
received, very suspicious !
Oct 29 14:29:17 sip /usr/sbin/ser[13884]: authorize(): Invalid nonce value
received, very suspicious !
Also there is a lot of 401 (unauthorise) errors,
The error which I got when the ser server crashed was;
Oct 28 10:05:35 sip /usr/sbin/ser[29943]: child process 29973 exited by a
signal 11
Oct 28 10:05:35 sip /usr/sbin/ser[29943]: core was not generated
Oct 28 10:05:35 sip /usr/sbin/ser[29943]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD
I release signal 11 is a segmentation fault and the iptel web site refers it
happens due to a bug in the software (we have SER v 0.8.10), Initially the
ser server was set up using an RPM, so please guide how can I reduced the
fifo buffered packets, will increasing number of ser childs would help???
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Prajyot Shirsolkar
Hello,
I am looking for a solution where I can register to 2 or more SIP providers and have 1-2 SIP clients. The selection of the used SIP provider should be happens on a prefix. A dial-in should be ring all phones.
Is this possible with this demon ?
If no, is their something which might be able to handle this ?
Thx
Andreas
__________________________________________________________
Mit WEB.DE FreePhone mit hoechster Qualitaet ab 0 Ct./Min.
weltweit telefonieren! http://freephone.web.de/?mc=021201
You can do either,
1. write your own C module to compare the src_ip and r-uri's ip address, or
2. use exec_msg() to call a shell script. This function exports variables to
the shell. It is in ser admin guide section 4.1
Richard
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Allan [mailto:voip_tango@yahoo.ca]
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 2:33 PM
> To: Richard
> Subject: RE: [Serusers] Multiple UA behind NAT and SIP Proxy Outside LAN
>
> Thanks Richard,
>
> How would this line look? I have read through the
> admin guide a number of times but have not seen how
> to do this. How would I actually compare the src_ip
> variable with part of the uri?
>
> Regards,
> Allan
>
> --- Richard <richard(a)o-matrix.org> wrote:
> > You can check if the src_ip and the r-uri's ip
> > address are the same. Just
> > make sure this is done after lookup() and before
> > being forwarded. This
> > method has lots of limitations. Check the archive
> > for more discussions. But
> > most of time it is sufficient.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
> > [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Allan
> > > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 2:08 PM
> > > To: Andris Parra L.; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] Multiple UA behind NAT and
> > SIP Proxy Outside LAN
> > >
> > > I am also looking for a way to determine if two
> > UAs
> > > are behind the same NAT. I have found that if I
> > do
> > > not force rtp_proxy between two UAs known to be
> > behind
> > > the same NAT, the call is setup and torn down
> > through
> > > SER and RTP is sent directly between the two UAs.
> > > This is how I want to call to operate. I just
> > can't
> > > see a way via SER's scripting language to make a
> > > decision based on the src_ip of the initial
> > request
> > > and a portion of the URI domain, which in my case
> > is
> > > the IP address of the NAT.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Allan
> > >
> > >
> > > --- "Andris Parra L." <apl_1980b(a)yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > I4m wondering if there is a way to comunicate UA
> > > > agents betwen them that are behind the same nat,
> > > > they are working perfectly with the outside
> > world
> > > > (I4m not having problems with Nat traversal),
> > but
> > > > they try to send the RTP and RTCP data to the
> > > > aparent public IP that they are registered in
> > the
> > > > Sip Proxy, and of course, the multimedia data
> > isn4t
> > > > processed by the router because the destination
> > IP
> > > > is the one asigned to the WAN interface of it
> > and it
> > > > sees it in the LAN interface.
> > > > I4m thinking that maybe the Sip Proxy (ser 0.14)
> > > > isn4t the problem, maybe the infraestructure is
> > not
> > > > enough, so, is there anything that you could
> > answer
> > > > me tha guide me in this scenario?
> > > >
> > > > I4ll be grateful for any information you could
> > give
> > > > me.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Andris Parra L.
> > > > apl_1980b(a)yahoo.com
> > > > Ipsofactum LTDA.
> > > > www.ipsofactum.com
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free.
> > Download
> > > now.>
> > _______________________________________________
> > > > Serusers mailing list
> > > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> > > Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
I�m wondering if there is a way to comunicate UA agents betwen them that are behind the same nat, they are working perfectly with the outside world (I�m not having problems with Nat traversal), but they try to send the RTP and RTCP data to the aparent public IP that they are registered in the Sip Proxy, and of course, the multimedia data isn�t processed by the router because the destination IP is the one asigned to the WAN interface of it and it sees it in the LAN interface.
I�m thinking that maybe the Sip Proxy (ser 0.14) isn�t the problem, maybe the infraestructure is not enough, so, is there anything that you could answer me tha guide me in this scenario?
I�ll be grateful for any information you could give me.
Andr�s Parra L.
apl_1980b(a)yahoo.com
Ipsofactum LTDA.
www.ipsofactum.com
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.
Hi,
I have problems setting up nathelper on already long time working SER
server.
my config is here : http://pastebin.ca/1786
I want to proxy all not local calls using rtpproxy to internet (later
ipv4-to-ipv6 too)
I have last cvs of rtpproxy and ser 0.8.14 on debian sarge...
ser can see rtpproxy and on outgoing calls i see in rtpproxy -f2
output :
rtpproxy: new session E2D420E7-BBAE-47B0-80E8-EFB777ABED78(a)10.150.63.27,
tag 520152133 requested
rtpproxy: new session on a port 35000 created, tag 520152133
rtpproxy: pre-filling caller's address with 10.150.63.27:8000
rtpproxy: session timeout
rtpproxy: RTP stats: 0 in from callee, 0 in from caller, 0 relayed, 0
dropped
rtpproxy: RTCP stats: 0 in from callee, 0 in from caller, 0 relayed, 0
dropped
rtpproxy: session on ports 35000/0 is cleaned up
and in ethereal i see only one packet send to iptel.org (I'm trying to
call iptel :) ) this packet is INVITE , and in headers i can read
contact: user@10.150.63.27:5060
is it ok... i thought that it have to be something like
asdadasd@sip-proxy.domain:38XXX
what am i doing wrong? have i to start rtpproxy with some parameters ? i
tried with -l <localip> but same result
Thanks in advice,
Alexander