sr-users May 2004

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

154 participants
333 discussions

[Serusers] CREATE init.d script
by Humberto Atristain 14 May '04

14 May '04

Pals Please help me create a init.d script I installed SER from sources Or please say me how to restart SER without init.d script Regards HA

5 4

RE: [Serusers] Manipulate To: Fom: Fields
by James Barroso 13 May '04

13 May '04

I am using Level3 as an upstream provider, and they require a + sign on the To and From, but my softswitch currently does not support the character. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:daniel@iptel.org] Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 2:31 PM To: James Barroso Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Manipulate To: Fom: Fields You need an onreply_route, like onreply_route[1] { # strip + ......... } and after prepending + in your route you have to call t_on_reply("1");, for example route { ..... # prepend + t_on_reply("1"); ..... } Anyhow, you should not touch the From and To headers, that may introduce a lot of interoperabilities. Why changing the request URI is not enough? >From and To are mostly used to identify the dialog by the clients. Daniel On 5/13/2004 9:37 PM, James Barroso wrote: > I am using SER to manipulate the INVITE URI and the To: and From: > fields in the message header. The manipulation works on request > messages, but does not seem to work on reply messages to those > requests. For example: > > > > In the following, a + is prepended to the first message in the second > message. > > > > U 172.16.252.235:5060 -> 172.16.252.228:5060 > > INVITE sip:14157671212@172.16.252.228:5060 SIP/2.0. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.235:5060;branch=z9hG4bK324671a0. > > From: <sip:18666779422@172.16.252.235>;tag=16777541. > > To: <sip:14157671212@172.16.252.228>. > > > > U 172.16.252.228:5060 -> 172.16.252.225:5060 > > INVITE sip:+14157671212@172.16.252.225:5060 SIP/2.0. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.228;branch=0. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.235:5060;branch=z9hG4bK324671a0. > > From: "James B" <sip:+18666779422@172.16.252.235>;tag=16777541. > > To: <sip:+14157671212@172.16.252.228>. > > > > When a 200 ok is received, I need to strip the + sign going back to > the originating device. Unfortunately, the route portion of the > ser.cfg file only seems to apply to request messages as is evident by > the fact that the plus remains intact in the following messages. In > the 200 ok that is forwarded to 172.16.252.235, I need to strip the + > sign from the To: and From: fields: > > > > # > > U 172.16.252.225:5060 -> 172.16.252.228:5060 > > SIP/2.0 200 OK. > > To: <sip:+14157671212@172.16.252.228>;tag=83b7263c. > > From: "James B"<sip:+18666779422@172.16.252.235>;tag=16777541. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.228;branch=0;received=172.16.252.228. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.235:5060;branch=z9hG4bK324671a0. > > Call-ID: a6880c80-1d91c30f-73-ebfc10ac(a)172.16.252.235. > > CSeq: 101 INVITE. > > > > # > > U 172.16.252.228:5060 -> 172.16.252.235:5060 > > SIP/2.0 200 OK. > > To: <sip:+14157671212@172.16.252.228>;tag=83b7263c. > > From: "James B"<sip:+18666779422@172.16.252.235>;tag=16777541. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.235:5060;branch=z9hG4bK324671a0. > > Call-ID: a6880c80-1d91c30f-73-ebfc10ac(a)172.16.252.235. > > > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- - > >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > >

3 2

RE: [Serusers] Manipulate To: Fom: Fields
by James Barroso 13 May '04

13 May '04

I have it working as show below. I would like to do it stateless...is there a way? -----Original Message----- From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:daniel@iptel.org] Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 2:31 PM To: James Barroso Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Manipulate To: Fom: Fields You need an onreply_route, like onreply_route[1] { # strip + ......... } and after prepending + in your route you have to call t_on_reply("1");, for example route { ..... # prepend + t_on_reply("1"); ..... } Anyhow, you should not touch the From and To headers, that may introduce a lot of interoperabilities. Why changing the request URI is not enough? >From and To are mostly used to identify the dialog by the clients. Daniel On 5/13/2004 9:37 PM, James Barroso wrote: > I am using SER to manipulate the INVITE URI and the To: and From: > fields in the message header. The manipulation works on request > messages, but does not seem to work on reply messages to those > requests. For example: > > > > In the following, a + is prepended to the first message in the second > message. > > > > U 172.16.252.235:5060 -> 172.16.252.228:5060 > > INVITE sip:14157671212@172.16.252.228:5060 SIP/2.0. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.235:5060;branch=z9hG4bK324671a0. > > From: <sip:18666779422@172.16.252.235>;tag=16777541. > > To: <sip:14157671212@172.16.252.228>. > > > > U 172.16.252.228:5060 -> 172.16.252.225:5060 > > INVITE sip:+14157671212@172.16.252.225:5060 SIP/2.0. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.228;branch=0. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.235:5060;branch=z9hG4bK324671a0. > > From: "James B" <sip:+18666779422@172.16.252.235>;tag=16777541. > > To: <sip:+14157671212@172.16.252.228>. > > > > When a 200 ok is received, I need to strip the + sign going back to > the originating device. Unfortunately, the route portion of the > ser.cfg file only seems to apply to request messages as is evident by > the fact that the plus remains intact in the following messages. In > the 200 ok that is forwarded to 172.16.252.235, I need to strip the + > sign from the To: and From: fields: > > > > # > > U 172.16.252.225:5060 -> 172.16.252.228:5060 > > SIP/2.0 200 OK. > > To: <sip:+14157671212@172.16.252.228>;tag=83b7263c. > > From: "James B"<sip:+18666779422@172.16.252.235>;tag=16777541. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.228;branch=0;received=172.16.252.228. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.235:5060;branch=z9hG4bK324671a0. > > Call-ID: a6880c80-1d91c30f-73-ebfc10ac(a)172.16.252.235. > > CSeq: 101 INVITE. > > > > # > > U 172.16.252.228:5060 -> 172.16.252.235:5060 > > SIP/2.0 200 OK. > > To: <sip:+14157671212@172.16.252.228>;tag=83b7263c. > > From: "James B"<sip:+18666779422@172.16.252.235>;tag=16777541. > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.235:5060;branch=z9hG4bK324671a0. > > Call-ID: a6880c80-1d91c30f-73-ebfc10ac(a)172.16.252.235. > > > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- - > >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > >

1 0

[Serusers] Manipulate To: Fom: Fields
by James Barroso 13 May '04

13 May '04

I am using SER to manipulate the INVITE URI and the To: and From: fields in the message header. The manipulation works on request messages, but does not seem to work on reply messages to those requests. For example: In the following, a + is prepended to the first message in the second message. U 172.16.252.235:5060 -> 172.16.252.228:5060 INVITE sip:14157671212@172.16.252.228:5060 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.235:5060;branch=z9hG4bK324671a0. From: <sip:18666779422@172.16.252.235>;tag=16777541. To: <sip:14157671212@172.16.252.228>. U 172.16.252.228:5060 -> 172.16.252.225:5060 INVITE sip:+14157671212@172.16.252.225:5060 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.228;branch=0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.235:5060;branch=z9hG4bK324671a0. From: "James B" <sip:+18666779422@172.16.252.235>;tag=16777541. To: <sip:+14157671212@172.16.252.228>. When a 200 ok is received, I need to strip the + sign going back to the originating device. Unfortunately, the route portion of the ser.cfg file only seems to apply to request messages as is evident by the fact that the plus remains intact in the following messages. In the 200 ok that is forwarded to 172.16.252.235, I need to strip the + sign from the To: and From: fields: # U 172.16.252.225:5060 -> 172.16.252.228:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK. To: <sip:+14157671212@172.16.252.228>;tag=83b7263c. From: "James B"<sip:+18666779422@172.16.252.235>;tag=16777541. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.228;branch=0;received=172.16.252.228. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.235:5060;branch=z9hG4bK324671a0. Call-ID: a6880c80-1d91c30f-73-ebfc10ac(a)172.16.252.235. CSeq: 101 INVITE. # U 172.16.252.228:5060 -> 172.16.252.235:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK. To: <sip:+14157671212@172.16.252.228>;tag=83b7263c. From: "James B"<sip:+18666779422@172.16.252.235>;tag=16777541. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.252.235:5060;branch=z9hG4bK324671a0. Call-ID: a6880c80-1d91c30f-73-ebfc10ac(a)172.16.252.235.

2 1

[Serusers] usb ip hone
by a.pletli＠euromacc.hu 13 May '04

13 May '04

Hello! I need some help. Anybody are using reliable and cheap usb phone with SER? What kind of type do you offer? Thanks Antal Pletli

2 1

[Serusers] IRC group (Channel)
by Mats Karlsson 13 May '04

13 May '04

Has ser an IRC channel on an irc server somewhere ? /Mats

2 2

[Serusers] SERWEB problem
by Stefano 13 May '04

13 May '04

Hi, thank you for your help, i tried internet explorer and it works with serweb, than i tried konqueror under linux and it works (only NETSCAPE 7.1 doesn't work)...not perfectly, there are other problem, but now i can act to configure serweb better! Thank you Stefano Blasco __________________________________________________________________ Tiscali ADSL libera la velocita'! Attiva Senza Canone entro il 17 maggio: navighi a 1,5 euro l'ora per i primi 3 mesi,se scegli il modem e' tuo in comodato gratuito e in piu' hai gratis SuperMail per 12 mesi. Non aspettare, attivala subito! http://abbonati.tiscali.it/adsl/prodotti/640Kbps/

1 0

[Serusers] usb ip hone
by a.pletli＠euromacc.hu 13 May '04

13 May '04

>I need some help. >Anybody are using reliable and cheap usb phone with SER? >What kind of type do you offer? Sorry, not offer, recommend... :-)

1 0

Re: [Serusers]: Problems with authentication
by Sara Allton 13 May '04

13 May '04

3 2

[Serusers] Retransmission Timeout
by Alan Litster 13 May '04

13 May '04

Hi, We have a problem with the timeout being to small for a satellite link, how do you go out changing the T1 timeout value for SER? Regards, Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email, and any files transmitted with it, is copyright and may contain confidential information. The contents are intended for the use of the addressee(s) only. Unauthorized use may be unlawful. If you receive this email by mistake, please advise sender immediately. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of Telco Electronics Limited. Nothing in this mail shall bind Telco Electronics Limited in any contract or obligation. Telco Electronics Limited 6-8 Oxford Court Brackley Northants NN13 7XY Tel 07000 701999 Fax 07000 701777

2 1

← Newer
1
...
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
...
34
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users May 2004