sr-users June 2004

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

176 participants
387 discussions

RE: [Serusers] as5400 and ser
by CM Rahman 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

Once I send a call via messenger, I don't hear anything other side. But after a while it disconnect. Here are the cisco config ****************************** controller T1 7/0:3 framing esf pri-group timeslots 1-24 description Prism Test *************************************** interface Serial7/0:3:23 no ip address isdn switch-type primary-ni isdn protocol-emulate network isdn incoming-voice modem isdn T310 180000 no cdp enable !*************************************** dial-peer voice 150 voip description CCSi voip phone destination-pattern 9T session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:216.236.160.11 codec g723r53 ***************************************** *Feb 15 16:18:09.720: ISDN Se7/0:3:23 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0xD is 0x2 0x1, Called num 5122200090 *Feb 15 16:18:09.720: ISDN Se7/0:3:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x002E Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '5122200090' Plan:ISDN, Type:National *Feb 15 16:18:09.732: ISDN Se7/0:3:23 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x802E Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 *Feb 15 16:20:17.967: ISDN Se7/0:3:23 Q931: TX -> DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x002E Cause i = 0x8290 - Normal call clearing *Feb 15 16:20:17.995: ISDN Se7/0:3:23 Q931: RX <- RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x802E *Feb 15 16:20:17.995: ISDN Se7/0:3:23 Q931: TX -> RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x002E &*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&* C.M. Rahman Jr. CCNP, MCSE Security "Secure your self by securing your System" CompTI Security Plus Certified CCS Internet http://www.ccsi.com 13704 Research Blvd. Building O-Suite 4 Austin, TX 78750 Tel: 512-257-2274 Ex: 115 -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Richard Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 3:27 AM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] as5400 and ser If you check this page, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk701/technologies_configuration_g uide_chapter09186a00800eadfa.html PSTN error "63 Service or option unavailable" is mapped to sip error "503 Service or option unavailable" which is in the header of the message. Also the page shows why IP phone or PSTN generates this and how proxy is supposed to do with it. Quote, "The SIP gateway generates this response if it is unable to process the request due to an overload or maintenance problem. Upon receiving this response, the gateway initiates a graceful call disconnect and clears the call. " Look like a pstn config issue. Use "debug isdn q931", "debug isdn q921" and "term mon" for further debuging. Cheers, Richard --- CM Rahman <cmrahman(a)ccsi.com> wrote: > Looking through your cisco config file, I am > guessing your E1 are not > Pri. Ami I correct? I am dealing with a channelized > DS3 with T1 Pri. I > will also share my config file after I can get the > call routed. > Currently I am getting this below. My understanding > is there is > something wrong in the call going from cisco to Pri > trunk. Anybody can > give me some clue, that will be great. > > > > 146.82.136.218:5060 -> 216.236.160.11:5060 > SIP/2.0 503 Service Unavailable..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP > 216.236.160.11;branch=z9h > G4bKc513.1c338976.0,SIP/2.0/UDP > 65.70.207.66:8675..From: > "pappusip(a)backup.c > csi.com" > <sip:pappusip@backup.ccsi.com>;tag=c270cb2a9ab14343b72218adb808612 > 4;epid=c91b05026b..To: > <sip:915125656553@backup.ccsi.com>;tag=E8186070-487. > .Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 01:38:28 GMT..Call-ID: > 9fef06800312431fbaa33d389f7d > 3ac7@192.168.1.101..Server: > Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x..CSeq: 1 > INVITE..Allo > w-Events: telephone-event..Content-Length: 0.... > > > > > > &*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&* > C.M. Rahman Jr. > CTO > CCNP, MCSE Security "Secure your self by securing > your System" > CompTI Security Plus Certified > CCS Internet > http://www.ccsi.com > 13704 Research Blvd. Building O-Suite 4 > Austin, TX 78750 > Tel: 512-257-2274 Ex: 115 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen Kingham > [mailto:Stephen.Kingham@aarnet.edu.au] > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 11:56 PM > To: CM Rahman > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] as5400 and ser > > Hi > > Along with several other we are putting together a > SER implementation > Tutorial for the R&E sector. > > We have a page up the the AS5300 and it may help > you, also if anyone is > interested in reviewing it? > > http://www.aarnet.edu.au/events/conferences/2004/apan-questnet/sipworksh > op/uas/ciscoas5300.html > > Regards > > Stephen > > CM Rahman wrote: > > >Anybody here using cisco as5400 for PSTN > termination? I am having some > >problem with call routing. If there are such person > will to help, > please > >drop me an email. > > > >Thanks > > > >&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&* > >C.M. Rahman Jr. > >CCNP, MCSE Security "Secure your self by > securing your System" > >CompTI Security Plus Certified > >CCS Internet > >http://www.ccsi.com > >13704 Research Blvd. Building O-Suite 4 > >Austin, TX 78750 > >Tel: 512-257-2274 Ex: 115 > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org > [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On > >Behalf Of Atle Samuelsen > >Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 7:29 PM > >To: Andreas Granig > >Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > >Subject: Re: [Serusers] Weird problem when, > restarting ser. > > > >Hi Andy > > > >* Andreas Granig <a.granig(a)inode.at> [040625 > 02:19]: > > > > > >>Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote: > >> > >> > >>>>>It started with log entries like this: > >>>>> > >>>>>Jun 24 11:55:54 voip > /usr/local/ser/sbin/ser[16801]: ERROR: > >>>>>build_req_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory > >>>>>Jun 24 11:55:54 voip > /usr/local/ser/sbin/ser[16801]: ERROR: > >>>>>print_uac_request: no pkg_mem > >>>>>Jun 24 11:55:54 voip > /usr/local/ser/sbin/ser[16801]: ERROR: > >>>>>t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>This could be a mem. leak (but this is unrelated > to the startup > >>>problem). > >>> > >>> > >>I use a stock SER (0.8.12) without modifications. > I just execute some > >>external C code by exec_dset and exec_msg, but > this shouldn't matter. > >> > >>Since this problem occured on our public server, I > just wanted to get > >>the service up and running again and thus didn't > think about dumping > >> > >> > >the > > > > > >>database for later analysis on the test system. > However, I'll try to > >>reproduce this effect and send some logs... > >> > >> > > > >I would check with Andrei and see what he says. > > > >-Atle > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Serusers mailing list > >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Serusers mailing list > >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > > -- > Stephen Kingham, MIT, BSc, E&C Cert > Project Manager and Consulting Engineer > mailto:Stephen.Kingham@aarnet.edu.au > Telephone +61 2 6222 3575 (office) > +61 419 417 471 (mobile) > Voice and Video over IP > for The Australian Academic Research Network > (AARNet) and > http://www.aarnet.edu.au > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

2 1

[Serusers] ser farms / architecture
by Jev 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

Hi SerUsers, I want to try and understand the issues involved in having a farm of SER servers. For shared usr_loc data service, is there another way for the servers to share the usr_loc datasource, besides running usr_loc dbmode at 3 and having all ser instances updating and querying the same DB? I would also like to segregate my registrar server from my proxy machine, but I still want my registrar to see invites and byes for billing purposes. Basically to separate all stateful proxying and rtp poxying (keeping it on one or more front end servers) from my registrar/billing server. So far I have been playing with proxying REGISTER and INVITE operations from the front end server(s) to a back end, and attempting to do call routing at the front end. Has anyone done something similar to this in the past? I'd be interested to hear peoples thoughts on this layout. Thanks, -Jev

2 1

[Serusers] Stateful redirect
by Gala, Dipen 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

Hey has any one have configured the SER to act as a stateful redirect server..... I am sure one of you have done it.....so can you please share your ser.cfg with me Or any one who has more info on the stateful redirect server pls help me out.... I have gone through admin guide and I have a running stateless redirect server. Hope someone's there to help me Dipen K Gala Fidelity Investments System Company - Telecom Phone: (617) 563-2729 Email: Dipen.Gala(a)FMR.com

2 1

[Serusers] re : Enhanced Call Control
by Brandon D. Mclarty 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

I have deployed a SER server and 'needing' it to do some enhance call control. I am desperately seeking a config that will get me close or even better an expert to serve as a consultant thru this application. Any help (configs, docs, contacts) is appreciated. Please contact me at 317-329-4988 or bmclarty(a)egix.com if interested 1) Auto attendant answers and "parks" or "holds" a call. 2) catch the callerid from a call to an auto attendant. 3) Intiate up to 3 outgoing calls to the parties 'find-me numbers' send calling parties "callerid" 4) Upon the 'called party' answering play a prompt "press 1 to talk press 2 to send to voicemail" ( I have a media server, application and network server in production ) 5) Upon pressing '1' the two calls are connected. I am basically looking to recreate a PCM "priority call manager".

1 0

[Serusers] nat_ping problems
by Jev 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

Hi all, Following up on my post a couple days ago; http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-June/008936.html I have now tested with rtpproxy/nathelper and mediaproxy and I seem to be having the same results. As of now my test environment is as follows; I have two networks, 192.168.123.0/24 SER server 192.168.100.0/24 UAC (Grandstream HardPhone) Currently I have a D-Link NAT router separating both networks. I have SER (CVS checkout from HEAD as of ~22nd June) running on FreeBSD 5.2.1-R I have had the same issue with both Maxims nathelper/rtproxy and Adrians mediaproxy. The below traces are from mediaproxy, as my most recent testing has been done here. I would like to have done the same analysis with nathelper/rtpproxy but I live under time constraints... 09:48:06 Register From UAC through NAT to ser Completed 09:48:44 UDP Ping Ser -> Nat Firewall -> UAC 09:49:44 UDP Ping Ser -> Nat Firewall -> UAC 09:50:45 UDP Ping Ser -> Nat Firewall -> UAC 09:51:45 UDP Ping Ser -> Nat Firewall -> XXXXX 09:52:46 UDP Ping Ser -> Nat Firewall -> XXXXX 09:53:47 UDP Ping Ser -> Nat Firewall -> XXXXX 09:54:47 UDP Ping Ser -> Nat Firewall -> XXXXX . . . . . 10:12:58 UDP Ping Ser -> Nat Firewall -> XXXXX Example of two UDP packet from SER to Nat Firewall: 09:48:44.151998 bottom.example.com.5060 > dlinknat.example.com.60408: udp 4 [tos 0x10] 0x0000 4510 0020 7c7d 0000 4011 8627 c0a8 7b65 E...|}..@..'..{e 0x0010 c0a8 7b62 13c4 ebf8 000c 8800 0000 0000 ..{b............ 0x0020 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 .............. 09:49:44.752972 bottom.example.com.5060 > dlinknat.example.com.60408: udp 4 [tos 0x10] 0x0000 4510 0020 7c83 0000 4011 8621 c0a8 7b65 E...|...@..!..{e 0x0010 c0a8 7b62 13c4 ebf8 000c 8800 0000 0000 ..{b............ 0x0020 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 .............. Example of the two corresponding UDP packets inside the NAT Firewall from NAT Firewall to the UAC 09:48:44.199818 bottom.example.com.5060 > 192.168.0.101.5060: udp 4 [tos 0x10] 0x0000 4510 0020 7c7d 0000 3f11 0225 c0a8 7b65 E...|}..?..%..{e 0x0010 c0a8 0065 13c4 13c4 000c db32 0000 0000 ...e.......2.... 0x0020 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 .............. 09:49:44.807148 bottom.example.com.5060 > 192.168.0.101.5060: udp 4 [tos 0x10] 0x0000 4510 0020 7c83 0000 3f11 021f c0a8 7b65 E...|...?.....{e 0x0010 c0a8 0065 13c4 13c4 000c db32 0000 0000 ...e.......2.... 0x0020 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 .............. Here is an example of two packets that get sent from SER to the NAT Firewall but never get past the NAT firewall. 10:18:01.579051 bottom.example.com.5060 > dlinknat.example.com.60408: udp 4 [tos 0x10] 0x0000 4510 0020 8193 0000 4011 8111 c0a8 7b65 E.......@.....{e 0x0010 c0a8 7b62 13c4 ebf8 000c 8800 0000 0000 ..{b............ 0x0020 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 .............. 10:19:02.179829 bottom.example.com.5060 > dlinknat.example.com.60408: udp 4 [tos 0x10] 0x0000 4510 0020 8198 0000 4011 810c c0a8 7b65 E.......@.....{e 0x0010 c0a8 7b62 13c4 ebf8 000c 8800 0000 0000 ..{b............ 0x0020 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 .............. It appears that the NAT firewall stops transmitting the packets, nor does it reject them, they just silently get dropped, and ser just continues to send them with no idea if they are getting through or not. If I set the phone to a very low register time then everything works fine, as it keeps the nat mapping current, and I can make calls from outside the nat to the UAC on the inside. I have attached my current config (mediaproxy) file. Finally, I have had the same problems while Cisco IOS, and a cheap U.S. Robotics (Lucent based I think) for natting, which makes me assume that this is not a nat router specific issue. Is there something basic I'm missing here? How have people made this configuration work? Is there anyone actual using nathelper/rtpproxy or mediaproxy in production? If anyone wants more specific debug information then just let me know! :) Thanks for your help, -Jev

3 8

RE: [Serusers] Compile error on a V100
by Joseph Cheung 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

Actually, I mean in the Makefile.defs; rather than using CFLAGS+= -mv8, I use CLFAGS+= -mpcu=ultrasparc What I have found from the internet is that it is a problem in the 2.9x implementation of gcc. In short, the compiler generates v8plus instruction without telling the assembler and causing the problem below. By using the option as above, compiler and assembler does the job properly. BTW, if you are using gcc 3.x, there is no issue as the Makefile.defs uses different CFLAGS. Anyway, thanks for the response. -----Original Message----- From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul [mailto:pelinescu-onciul@fokus.fraunhofer.de] Sent: June 25, 2004 4:38 AM To: Joseph Cheung Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Compile error on a V100 On Jun 24, 2004 at 18:48, Joseph Cheung <Joseph.Cheung2(a)TELUS.COM> wrote: > Solve the compilation problem finally by using -cpu=ultrasparc option. What gcc version do you use? I couldn't find ultrasparc in my gcc-2.95 man page. I don't have gcc-2.95 installed any more on my ultrasparc (upgraded to 3.x) so I couldn't test it. Andrei > > -----Original Message----- > From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Cheung > Sent: June 24, 2004 5:23 PM > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: [Serusers] Compile error on a V100 > > Hi. > > I am trying to compile the SER on a Sun Fire V100 and have the following assemble error. > > I am wondering if someone could point me to the right direction. > > Thanks > > JC > > bash: makeall: command not found > ipvoiss1:/usr/joseph/JC/ser/ser-0.8.12$ make all > Makefile.defs:473: Old gcc detected (2.9x), use gcc >= 3.1 for better results > Makefile:238: warning: overriding commands for target `/usr/local' > Makefile:235: warning: ignoring old commands for target `/usr/local' > Makefile:241: warning: overriding commands for target `/usr/local' > Makefile:238: warning: ignoring old commands for target `/usr/local' > Makefile:245: warning: overriding commands for target `/usr/local' > Makefile:241: warning: ignoring old commands for target `/usr/local' > Makefile:248: warning: overriding commands for target `/usr/local' > Makefile:245: warning: ignoring old commands for target `/usr/local' > Makefile:251: warning: overriding commands for target `/usr/local' > Makefile:248: warning: ignoring old commands for target `/usr/local' > gcc -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wall -mv8 -DNAME='"ser"' -DVERSION='"0.8.12"' -DARCH='"sparc64"' -DOS='"solaris"' -DCOMPILER='"gcc 2.95"' -D__CPU_sparc64 -D__OS_solaris -DCFG_DIR='"/usr/local /etc/ser/"' -DPKG_MALLOC -DSHM_MEM -DSHM_MMAP -DDNS_IP_HACK -DUSE_IPV6 -DUSE_TCP -DDISABLE_NAGLE > -DF_MALLOC -DFAST_LOCK -DADAPTIVE_WAIT -DADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024 -DHAVE_GETIPNODEBYNAME -DHAVE_SYS_SOCKIO_H -DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD -c main.c -o main.o > /usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp/ccgv1YCz.s", line 1375: error: cannot use v8plus instructions in a non-v8plus target binary > /usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp/ccgv1YCz.s", line 1401: error: cannot use v8plus instructions in a non-v8plus target binary > /usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp/ccgv1YCz.s", line 10948: error: cannot use v8plus instructions in a non-v8plus target binary > /usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp/ccgv1YCz.s", line 10977: error: cannot use v8plus instructions in a non-v8plus target binary > make: *** [main.o] Error 1 > ipvoiss1:/usr/joseph/JC/ser/ser-0.8.12$ > > -----Original Message----- > From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy George > Sent: June 24, 2004 4:23 PM > To: gc > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] Using AS5300 for SER > > > Where 10.1.1.1 is the address of the SER host and 10.2.1.1 is the > address of the AS5300. > > access-list 101 permit ip host 10.1.1.1 host 10.2.1.1 > access-list 101 deny tcp any host 10.2.1.1 eq 5060 > access-list 101 deny udp any host 10.2.1.1 eq 5060 > access-list 101 permit ip any any > > - Jeremy > > On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, gc wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:16:45 -0400 > > From: gc <garych(a)unidial.com> > > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: [Serusers] Using AS5300 for SER > > > > I am using AS5300 as PSTN Gateway for SER. I'd like to make the AS5300 only accept sip call forward by ser. Does anybody know how to setup AS5300 for this? > > > > Gary > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

1 0

[Serusers] Using AS5300 for SER
by gc 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

I am using AS5300 as PSTN Gateway for SER. I'd like to make the AS5300 only accept sip call forward by ser. Does anybody know how to setup AS5300 for this? Gary

4 4

RE: [Serusers] Compile error on a V100
by Joseph Cheung 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

Solve the compilation problem finally by using -cpu=ultrasparc option. -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Cheung Sent: June 24, 2004 5:23 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: [Serusers] Compile error on a V100 Hi. I am trying to compile the SER on a Sun Fire V100 and have the following assemble error. I am wondering if someone could point me to the right direction. Thanks JC bash: makeall: command not found ipvoiss1:/usr/joseph/JC/ser/ser-0.8.12$ make all Makefile.defs:473: Old gcc detected (2.9x), use gcc >= 3.1 for better results Makefile:238: warning: overriding commands for target `/usr/local' Makefile:235: warning: ignoring old commands for target `/usr/local' Makefile:241: warning: overriding commands for target `/usr/local' Makefile:238: warning: ignoring old commands for target `/usr/local' Makefile:245: warning: overriding commands for target `/usr/local' Makefile:241: warning: ignoring old commands for target `/usr/local' Makefile:248: warning: overriding commands for target `/usr/local' Makefile:245: warning: ignoring old commands for target `/usr/local' Makefile:251: warning: overriding commands for target `/usr/local' Makefile:248: warning: ignoring old commands for target `/usr/local' gcc -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wall -mv8 -DNAME='"ser"' -DVERSION='"0.8.12"' -DARCH='"sparc64"' -DOS='"solaris"' -DCOMPILER='"gcc 2.95"' -D__CPU_sparc64 -D__OS_solaris -DCFG_DIR='"/usr/local /etc/ser/"' -DPKG_MALLOC -DSHM_MEM -DSHM_MMAP -DDNS_IP_HACK -DUSE_IPV6 -DUSE_TCP -DDISABLE_NAGLE -DF_MALLOC -DFAST_LOCK -DADAPTIVE_WAIT -DADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024 -DHAVE_GETIPNODEBYNAME -DHAVE_SYS_SOCKIO_H -DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD -c main.c -o main.o /usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp/ccgv1YCz.s", line 1375: error: cannot use v8plus instructions in a non-v8plus target binary /usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp/ccgv1YCz.s", line 1401: error: cannot use v8plus instructions in a non-v8plus target binary /usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp/ccgv1YCz.s", line 10948: error: cannot use v8plus instructions in a non-v8plus target binary /usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp/ccgv1YCz.s", line 10977: error: cannot use v8plus instructions in a non-v8plus target binary make: *** [main.o] Error 1 ipvoiss1:/usr/joseph/JC/ser/ser-0.8.12$ -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy George Sent: June 24, 2004 4:23 PM To: gc Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Using AS5300 for SER Where 10.1.1.1 is the address of the SER host and 10.2.1.1 is the address of the AS5300. access-list 101 permit ip host 10.1.1.1 host 10.2.1.1 access-list 101 deny tcp any host 10.2.1.1 eq 5060 access-list 101 deny udp any host 10.2.1.1 eq 5060 access-list 101 permit ip any any - Jeremy On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, gc wrote: > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:16:45 -0400 > From: gc <garych(a)unidial.com> > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: [Serusers] Using AS5300 for SER > > I am using AS5300 as PSTN Gateway for SER. I'd like to make the AS5300 only accept sip call forward by ser. Does anybody know how to setup AS5300 for this? > > Gary -- _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

2 1

RE: [Serusers] as5400 and ser
by CM Rahman 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

Looking through your cisco config file, I am guessing your E1 are not Pri. Ami I correct? I am dealing with a channelized DS3 with T1 Pri. I will also share my config file after I can get the call routed. Currently I am getting this below. My understanding is there is something wrong in the call going from cisco to Pri trunk. Anybody can give me some clue, that will be great. 146.82.136.218:5060 -> 216.236.160.11:5060 SIP/2.0 503 Service Unavailable..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.236.160.11;branch=z9h G4bKc513.1c338976.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 65.70.207.66:8675..From: "pappusip(a)backup.c csi.com" <sip:pappusip@backup.ccsi.com>;tag=c270cb2a9ab14343b72218adb808612 4;epid=c91b05026b..To: <sip:915125656553@backup.ccsi.com>;tag=E8186070-487. .Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 01:38:28 GMT..Call-ID: 9fef06800312431fbaa33d389f7d 3ac7@192.168.1.101..Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x..CSeq: 1 INVITE..Allo w-Events: telephone-event..Content-Length: 0.... &*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&* C.M. Rahman Jr. CTO CCNP, MCSE Security "Secure your self by securing your System" CompTI Security Plus Certified CCS Internet http://www.ccsi.com 13704 Research Blvd. Building O-Suite 4 Austin, TX 78750 Tel: 512-257-2274 Ex: 115 -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Kingham [mailto:Stephen.Kingham@aarnet.edu.au] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 11:56 PM To: CM Rahman Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] as5400 and ser Hi Along with several other we are putting together a SER implementation Tutorial for the R&E sector. We have a page up the the AS5300 and it may help you, also if anyone is interested in reviewing it? http://www.aarnet.edu.au/events/conferences/2004/apan-questnet/sipworksh op/uas/ciscoas5300.html Regards Stephen CM Rahman wrote: >Anybody here using cisco as5400 for PSTN termination? I am having some >problem with call routing. If there are such person will to help, please >drop me an email. > >Thanks > >&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&* >C.M. Rahman Jr. >CCNP, MCSE Security "Secure your self by securing your System" >CompTI Security Plus Certified >CCS Internet >http://www.ccsi.com >13704 Research Blvd. Building O-Suite 4 >Austin, TX 78750 >Tel: 512-257-2274 Ex: 115 > >-----Original Message----- >From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On >Behalf Of Atle Samuelsen >Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 7:29 PM >To: Andreas Granig >Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >Subject: Re: [Serusers] Weird problem when, restarting ser. > >Hi Andy > >* Andreas Granig <a.granig(a)inode.at> [040625 02:19]: > > >>Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote: >> >> >>>>>It started with log entries like this: >>>>> >>>>>Jun 24 11:55:54 voip /usr/local/ser/sbin/ser[16801]: ERROR: >>>>>build_req_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory >>>>>Jun 24 11:55:54 voip /usr/local/ser/sbin/ser[16801]: ERROR: >>>>>print_uac_request: no pkg_mem >>>>>Jun 24 11:55:54 voip /usr/local/ser/sbin/ser[16801]: ERROR: >>>>>t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches >>>>> >>>>> >>>This could be a mem. leak (but this is unrelated to the startup >>>problem). >>> >>> >>I use a stock SER (0.8.12) without modifications. I just execute some >>external C code by exec_dset and exec_msg, but this shouldn't matter. >> >>Since this problem occured on our public server, I just wanted to get >>the service up and running again and thus didn't think about dumping >> >> >the > > >>database for later analysis on the test system. However, I'll try to >>reproduce this effect and send some logs... >> >> > >I would check with Andrei and see what he says. > >-Atle > >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > -- Stephen Kingham, MIT, BSc, E&C Cert Project Manager and Consulting Engineer mailto:Stephen.Kingham@aarnet.edu.au Telephone +61 2 6222 3575 (office) +61 419 417 471 (mobile) Voice and Video over IP for The Australian Academic Research Network (AARNet) and http://www.aarnet.edu.au

4 3

[Serusers] Terminate current calls
by Kapil Dhawan 25 Jun '04

25 Jun '04

Hi List Can we write a script to terminate current calls. Any idea. using shell or anything. Regards _________________________________________________________________ Start your day with a little more power. http://go.msnserver.com/IN/51408.asp Get Oral B CrossAction today!

2 1

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
39
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users June 2004