I'm starting to use the pa module, and noticed that when it gets a SUBSCRIBE, the 200 response doesn't have an expires header, as it should. (RFC 3265, 3.1.1)
SUBSCRIBE sip:vmail@192.168.0.5 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP voipdev3.zoom.com:33050;rport
From: <sip:8100100@192.168.0.5:5060>;tag=a67e989d-13c4-173-5ac26-24be
To: <sip:vmail@192.168.0.5>
CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE
Call-ID: b5bb80-a67e989d-13c4-173-5ac26-5440
Expires: 3600
Event: presence
Max-Forwards: 70
Supported: replaces
Contact: <sip:8100100@192.168.0.5:5060>
Content-Length: 0
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP voipdev3.zoom.com:33050;rport=33050;received=192.168.0.10
From: <sip:8100100@192.168.0.5:5060>;tag=a67e989d-13c4-173-5ac26-24be
To: <sip:vmail@192.168.0.5>;tag=92462461b2a59d6c6be4b5af5841f077-b62f
CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE
Call-ID: b5bb80-a67e989d-13c4-173-5ac26-5440
Content-Length: 0
I haven't spent a lot of time looking at the code for pa, but should this be an easy thing to fix?
Thanks,
--
Doug
Hi all
I noticed that the desc_time_order parameter of the registrar module (in ser.cfg) doesn't seem to work as it should (according to the description in the registrar manual).
If I understood correctly, if desc_time_order = 1 (using modparam) the newest contact should be used among those of same priority (I'm using the append_branches parameter equal to 0).
Another doubt is whether it is possible or not to use append_branches=1 to do priority-driven forking (all contacts are receiving the request, no matter which is their priority; is it possible to limit the forking just to those of same priority (q)? or even something better? :-) )
thanks a lot
Jimes Vasco Milanez
Diretoria de Sistemas de Nova Geração
CPqD Telecom & IT Solutions
Tel.: +55 19 3705-4879
jimes(a)cpqd.com.br
www.cpqd.com.br
Hi,
I'm running ser-0.8.12 and radiusclient-0.3.2 on Redhat Linux 8. SER has
radius authentication and accounting enabled.
I have configured an ATA 186 to register to SER. When the authentication
request is forwarded to the radius server, the ATA's LoginID and UID fields
values are forwarded correctly but the password (PWD field) is blank.
I have tested runnning the "radexample" radiusclient test script and it
works perfectly: userid and password are received by radius server.
Any ideas on how to solve this problem ? Is there a way for SER to force
the ATAs UID value to be it's password value when sending authentication
request to radius server ?
Thanks.
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Hi,
Is it possible to change the connection information (c tag) in the SDP? My media gateway (SIP->PSTN) has local IP addresses. I made a NAT translation on the router to make it accesible to the public network. Softphones in the public network were to able to successfully registered on the SER proxy server. The problem is when i start to make a call. The OK message that is sent by the media gateway has an SDP whose connection information has a local IP since it doesnt know anything about the translation on the router. Although the signaling are all correct, the RTP ports are not able to successfully connect and as a result the parties are not able to hear each other. So I need to change the local IP on the SDP with the mapped public IP on the router before passing it on to the caller.
Thanks,
Ian
First of all let me start by saying thank you to the people that helped
me so far.
I have a question:
I want to build this type of system:
_____
| |
192.X.X.X<---->| |
| SER |<-------> WAN
190.X.X.X<---->| |
|_____|
(as u can c my drawing skills aint that good)
I'm currently running SER on the local 192.X with only one small
problem.
My question is I know I'll have to run an RTP proxy and some sort of
NAT/STUN.
I just don't know what exactly to use.
To my problem:
This is a snippet of the code:
if (uri=~"^sip:9") {
strip(1);
record_route();
forward(192.X.X.X, 5060);
};
This is a simple static route to PSTN GW.
The invite gets to the GW.
The "BYE" from the GW gets to the SER machine but the SER doesn't send
it to the client that established the call (it just doesn't to a thing)
Shi Hoch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
~ I am currently investigating SER, is there a way to do
authentication with LDAP ?
- --
Taymour A El Erian
System Division Manager
CNA, MCSE, CCNA, LPIC
T.E. Data
E-mail: taymour.elerian(a)tedata.net
Web: www.tedata.net
Tel: +(202)-4166600
Fax: +(202)-4166700
Ext: 1101
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with MultiZilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFA7R9OX1dv4NHexooRAqwkAKCZT6IaOAeo+G5QFBydkFhYMKN1jgCgoDzy
FizQ5hy9XTyDV7A1m9V0wZ4=
=D/Ju
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi Saludos,
How are you? are you able to make forwarding SIP to h323 in SER?
We are looking for a consultant, who can help us in this issue?
Regards,
Amar Behura
