Hi,
We are intrested to have ser installed in RedHat9 or FreeBSD is there
any one who can help us as we are intrested to setup this :
UA----SIPPROXY---PSTN
|
|
IVR+ACCOUNTING+Radius+MYSQL
we are intrested to pay for the setup we have already done the following
if any one help us to resolve on phone it is fine.
1.SER installed using RPM's
2.serctl is working able to add users
3.MYSQL is working and verified
we need few technical issues to be solved
1.Multiple DOMAINS
2.IVR
3.WEB Interface
Regards,
Karun
Hey guys and girls,
Has anyone had any experience integrating some kind of push to talk
solution with Ser? or indeed with sems/asterisk or other offering? It
doesn't necessarily have to be true push to talk... it can be based on a
client/conferencing solution as well... my initial thoughts might be
that a client might be able to maintain some kind of user list, on which
users could be assigned to a "conference" channel... when one user hits
"talk" everyone is joined to the conference, the user speaks and then
when they let go of the button, the conference is ended.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this subject? All ideas very welcome.
Dave
-------------------------------------
Dave Bath
Regional BGAN Engineer
Inmarsat Ltd (www.inmarsat.com <http://www.inmarsat.com/> )
Global Sattelite Communications
07736 232085
NOTE: The information contained in this email is intended for the named
recipients only, it may be privileged and confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you must not copy distribute or take any action
in reliance upon it. No warranties or assurances are made in relation to
the safety and content of this email and any attachments. No liability
is accepted for any consequences arising from it
I have been looking a little into SER 0.8.12/14 in the last few days for
the first time, and I have a few a questions:-
- I am using SER with the MS RTC 1.2 SDK and I noticed that if I have
record_route in the config, the messages between clients don't get
through. Is this normal? Is it fixable? If RTC is non-compliant could a
MS compliant module be created (just a thought)?
- I would like to send a MESSAGE to the server(a)192.168.2.2 so I can tell
the server to perform particular functions, I have set-up a exec_msg to
capture these messages to server(a)192.168.2.2 to send to a script file,
however looking at the environment from the script file I cannot see the
actual message content. Again, is this possible?
I'm sure I'll have more questions but that'll do for now :)
Thank-you!
--
Andrew Mee
I have Redhat 9.0, which normally writes stuff in the /var/log/messages
file, but no SER messages. Almost as if SER is not even running but I
checked and it is running.
MS
>From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)iptel.org>
>Reply-To: daniel(a)iptel.org
>To: Masoud Safi <masoudsafi(a)hotmail.com>
>CC: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER debug output
>Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:07:39 +0200
>
>if you have debian, look into /var/log/syslog.
>
>Daniel
>
>On 7/29/2004 8:35 PM, Masoud Safi wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>Based what I am finding from previous posting, SER is to output its debug
>>info to the /var/log/messages file, however, I have set my debug=9 and not
>>seeing any debug info in the messages file.
>>
>>Any ideas?
>>
>>Thanks
>>MS
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Planning a family vacation? Check out the MSN Family Travel guide!
>>http://dollar.msn.com
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
Hello,
Based what I am finding from previous posting, SER is to output its debug
info to the /var/log/messages file, however, I have set my debug=9 and not
seeing any debug info in the messages file.
Any ideas?
Thanks
MS
_________________________________________________________________
Planning a family vacation? Check out the MSN Family Travel guide!
http://dollar.msn.com
Hi,
Serweb: 2004-01-04
Ser: ver0.8.14
Clients: x-lite software phone, Windows Messager,
Grandstream IP phone
I have a problem on showing use status. When logging
to the admin page, select "
show online user only" and click "find", nothing is
displayed on the screen. Whe
n logging into the user's personal page, click
"phonebook" or 'missed-call", all
user status column shows "offline" even for those
online users. All clients can
communicate through the ser.
Can anyone figure out what's wrong with my serweb?
Shall I upgrade it to ver2004-7-27?
Thanks&Regards/Linda
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Log on to Messenger with your mobile phone!
http://sg.messenger.yahoo.com
hello friends,
i want to activate the cpl but i could not able to
get the right way
what i did is
1) patch -p0<modules/cpl-c/tm.patch
from sip_router directory
but after this what do i need to do for getting
cpl-c.so
your help will be highly appreciated
with regards
rama kanth
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Greetings,
I might be missing the obvious, but I need a fresh head to help me out. I
have a SER server setting behind the ISP firewall with NAT, and I have my UA
(Cisco ATA 186 v1.14) behind my Linux iptables with NAT (firewall).
REGISTER messages keep going out to the SER, but my ngrep does not show any
messages attempted back from the SER. It almost looks like as if SER is not
even running, but it is.
In my local LAN, I do have another Redhat 9.0 running SER with a local IP,
so my UA is not crossing a fiewall to get to the SER, and everything works
fine.
My ser.cfg is setup identical on both local and the remote SER servers.
Any ideas as to what it is that I might be missing?
MS
_________________________________________________________________
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
Michael, I am in the process of implementing LCR functionality which
could be extended to TOD routing as well. Routing will be based on
domain source, pstn destination and priority/weight for load balancing
and redundancy. A script will update the table based on external
pricing information.
I will keep the list posted (after holidays)
Adrian
>>>>>>>>>>>>
afaik, there is no work done in this area.
bogdan
Michael Przybylski wrote:
> Has anybody figured out how to do this?
> Can anybody share any pointers?
>
> Best regards,
> Mike Przybylski
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Ahhh sorry... schoolboy error... have been looking at this for so long
today my mind had completely frozen over!
Many thanks, and works brilliantly now!
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Ezequiel Colombo [mailto:ecolombo@arcotel.net]
Sent: 29 July 2004 17:06
To: Dave Bath; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] offline users vs. non-existant
Hi, i am using does_uri_exist() from uri module
Ej:
if (!does_uri_exist()) {log(1,"USER UNKNOWN"); sl_send_reply("404", "Not
Found"); end_media_session(); break;};
..modules/uri/README:
1.4.4. does_uri_exist()
Check if username in the request URI belongs to an existing user.
Example 1-12. does_uri_exist usage
...
if (does_uri_exist()) {
...
};
Regards
Ezequiel Colombo
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Bath
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 12:53 PM
Subject: [Serusers] offline users vs. non-existant
Hey everyone,
I'm trying to work out how to recognise whether a user is offline or
just
doesn't exist.
I have this snippet of code .
if (!lookup("location")) {
<snip>
if ((method=="INVITE" || method=="ACK") && t_newtran() ) {
t_reply("404", "Not Found");
# Put an entry in the database
acc_db_request("404 Not Found","missed_calls");
break;
} else {
# all other requests to off-line users are simply
replied
# statelessly and no reports are issued
sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
break;
};
However, I don't think it's right.. as I don't see under what situations
I
will reach the else statement. No matter whether I call an offline user
or
a non-existent user I always get a 404 Not Found and an entry is stored
in
the database.
This is not ideal - I'd like to be able to differentiate between an
offline
and a non-existent user..
Can anyone help me on this please?
Many thanks in advance,
D
-------------------------------------
Dave Bath
dave(a)fuuz.com
www.fuuz.com
07736 232085
NOTE: The information contained in this email is intended for the named
recipients only, it may be privileged and confidential. If you are not
the
intended recipient, you must not copy distribute or take any action in
reliance upon it. No warranties or assurances are made in relation to
the
safety and content of this email and any attachments. No liability is
accepted for any consequences arising from it
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers