Hi,
I don't know if anyone has experienced this. The ser stops getting any
packets, ser log shows no activity. When I do "netstat -an", I got this,
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
udp 261580 0 80.1.2.3:5060 0.0.0.0:*
udp 85224 0 0.0.0.0:35940 0.0.0.0:*
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:35941 0.0.0.0:*
udp 47704 0 0.0.0.0:35942 0.0.0.0:*
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:35943 0.0.0.0:*
I restarted ser several times, didn't help. So I restarted rtpproxy. Ser
started processing packets and the recv-q drops to 0. I wonder what could
cause recv-Q accumulating packets. Everything was running fine without any
problem for a long time. I haven't made any change to either ser or rtpproxy
recently.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Richard
Hi,
SER works fine when digest authentication is turned off, connecting a phone
and a copy of SJPhone, however when i remove the comments for auth, and
if(!(www_auten...)) ser dies whenever the one of the things try to connect
to it.
the following is recorded in ngrep
U 192.168.0.18:5060 -> 192.168.0.6:5060
REGISTER sip:192.168.0.6 SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.0.18;branch=z9hG4bKa6155d96e0772e23..From: <sip:phone_User@19
2.168.0.6>;tag=ac25e718e18ae5ea..To:
<sip:phone_User@192.168.0.6>..Contact:
<sip:phone_User@192.168.0.18>..Call-ID: 34cc
4c2e6df9395b@192.168.0.18..CSeq: 100 REGISTER..Expires: 3600..User-Agent:
Grandstream BT100 1.0.5.16..Max-Forwards: 70..
Allow:
INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY,REFER,OPTIONS,INFO,SUBSCRIBE..Content-Length:
0....
#
I 192.168.0.6 -> 192.168.0.18 3:3
....E0........................}.REGISTER sip:192.168.0.6 SIP/2.0..Via:
SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.18;branch=z9hG4bKa6155d96e0
772e23..From: <sip:phone_User@192.168.0.6>;tag=ac25e718e18ae5ea..To:
<sip:phone_User@192.168.0.6>..Contact: <sip:phone_U
ser(a)192.168.0.18>..Call-ID: 34cc4c2e6df9395b@192.168.0.18..CSeq: 100
REGISTER..Expires: 3600..User-Agent: Grandstream BT
100 1.0.5.16..Max-Forwards: 70..Allow:
INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY,REFER,OPTIONS,INFO,SUBSCRIBE..Content-Length:
0....
i'm not 100% sure that i've set up the entry in the database corrently, but
surely it should simply refuse connection to the phone rather than just
dieing.
Many thanks,
Damian
Does anyone have any opinions on this? What I'm worried about is of
course running out of procs and thus hanging SER, I believed this to
have happened several times..
Thanks..
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Schulte
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 8:45 AM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Child procs
Do increasing child procs actually do anything? When I do a 'ps axu' I
only show 4 of the procs having CPU time, the rest having no cpu time at
all. Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Matt
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi, there~:
I've made a workable SER with the source code version
0.8.14. But while modifying the ser.cfg file, problem occurs.
The default setting is :
fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
I commented this and add a line to change it into:
#fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
socket="/tmp/ser_socket"
and problems occurred:
# ser start
0(1987) parse error (25,1-7): parse error
0(1987) parse error (25,1-7):
ERROR: bad config file (2 errors)
Is this also a file format problem? Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Hi, All
Does any one use video conference in SER+rtpproxy.
I use Windows Messenger and It's ok without rtpproxy.
But, when my UA behide NAT, Video can not work.
Should I do something in vedio package??
Best Regards,
Nilus
Hi,
Is serctl showdb ment to show you all users? I thought when a user
disconnected after a certain amount of time they are removed from the
location table, this doesn't seem to be the case as I logged off last night
and its still showing me as logged in:
| 6494485566 | work(a)unix.co.nz |
05BEB9F3FC964199B405B4C9AB9878B3(a)voip.fast.co.nz |
| v0ne | barry(a)unix.co.nz |
The-Answer-To-The-Ultimate-Question-Of-Life-Universe-And-Everything |
Thanks
Barry
Regarding to this issue
Well, thanks to Lucas, just to test i changed the pyhton version in
my "lab" server from python2.3 to pyhton2.4.1. I made the same test with
the rtpgenerator and "voila".
Check it out :
Before 80 simultaneus calls :
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
13915 root 15 0 4628 4628 2068 S 1.0 0.9 0:00 mediaproxy.py
During the test :
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
13915 root 25 0 4864 4864 2068 R 99.9 0.9 0:31 mediaproxy.py
After the test :
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
3356 root 15 0 1600 1600 1036 S 0.0 0.3 0:00 bash
13915 root 15 0 4864 4864 2068 S 0.0 0.9 0:44 mediaproxy.py
0.9 % !!!!!
I made the test a couples of times later and the %MEM used is still 0.9%.
I guess that it was maybe a problem between the python2.3 and the
mediaproxy? Don't know...
I'm going to change the python version in my production machine. i'm going
to keep you inform about the results...
Thanks to Lucas...again.
Best Regards,
Ricardo Martinez.-
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Ricardo Martinez [mailto:rmartinez@redvoiss.net]
> Enviado el: Viernes, 08 de Abril de 2005 17:33
> Para: 'Lucas Aimaretto'; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Asunto: RE: [Serusers] Mediaproxy still consuming a lot of
> RAM resources.
>
>
> For example now i have 14 simultaneus calls.
>
> PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME
> CPU COMMAND
> 11760 root 15 0 601M 518M 2396 R 7.2 51.4
> 69:10 0 mediaproxy.py
>
>
> When the active calls are 0 again the CPU % reach 0.2%, but
> the %MEM is
> greater than 51.4%, and always increasing..
> A couple of questions.
> How you launch mediaproxy?. And in your last mail what are the pyhton
> proccess running.. i don't see the mediaproxy process running.
> Thanks again.
>
> Ricardo.-
>
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: Lucas Aimaretto [mailto:lucas@cyneric.com]
> > Enviado el: Viernes, 08 de Abril de 2005 17:20
> > Para: 'Ricardo Martinez'; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > Asunto: RE: [Serusers] Mediaproxy still consuming a lot of
> > RAM resources.
> >
> >
> > > But when you check the use of RAM memory in your machine...
> > > (maybe with the command "top" or the command "free") don't
> > > you notice a increasing amount of RAM used without being
> > > released? As i mentioned i have this problem.. this is a
> > > snippet of the output of the "top" command in my machine:
> > >
> > > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME
> > > CPU COMMAND
> > > 11760 root 15 0 590M 516M 2396 S 0.9
> > 51.2
> > > 68:15 0 mediaproxy.py
> > >
> > > 51.2% of memory used? What version of pyhton are you using?,
> > > what OS are you using?. Thanks!
> >
> > Hey!, how many calls where you proxying when you had that usage of
> > memmory ?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Lucas
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.5 - Release Date:
> 07/04/2005
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>