hello,
As a basic call flow like below.
UAC (SER)
| |
| INVITE F1 |
|----------------------->|
| 100 Trying F2 |
|<-----------------------|
| |
| 200 OK F3 |
|<-----------------------|
| ACK F4 |
|----------------------->|
if the UAC request INVITE method contain a "Expire" field with the value of 120.
and after 120 second the final response ACK reach the SER. in this scenarios, Would SER think this ACK is valid respone from UAC? and would SER correctly proxy this message to corresponding UAS?
Regards
Disclaimer:
The contents of this e-mail, and its attachments, if any, are confidential and may be protected
by law against any unauthorized use. If you have received this e-mail by mistake or have
reason to believe that you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply
e-mail as soon as possible and delete it from your computer system immediately thereafter.
If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy this e-mail or attachment or disclose
the contents to any other person. While we have made every effort to keep our network virus free,
we take no responsibility for any computer virus which might be transferred by way of this e-mail.
Hello
I have a very specific case all my nated hard ip
phones are working like RichCOM but the problem is
only with nated softphone like sjphone it is not
working on 5060. and when i change prot to 5061 then
all nated soft/hard phones working with SER and
successfully registered. i tried to ngrep port 5060
and there is no message from nated softphone.
any idea why this is happening
thanks in advance
Kamran
______________________________________________________
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/
As I found no other support email address for mediaproxy, I'm sending
here this request...
Is it possible to implement an option in mediaproxy to allow an
IMMEDIATE RE-INVITE to both UAs as soon as the RTP streams start?
The idea is to use Mediaproxy only to find out the NATted RTP ports of
both UAs. Then a re-INVITE is immediately sent to the UAs so that the
streams are no longer proxied, avoiding all problems of RTP relaying:
waste of bandwidth, longer delays, bad scalability, etc.
I know this will not work with symmetric NATs, but I found that they are
relatively rare and anyway they will neither work with STUN...
If anybody knows that this is theoretically impossible to implement,
please tell me that.
Thanks.
--
___________________________________________________
__
|- giannici(a)neomedia.it
|ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it
___________________________________________________
Hi,
Trying pingtel softphone to work with SER for click and talk ?
What config exactly for pingtel to register with SER ?
Thanks,
FK
---------------------------------
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
This feature only works with a mysql database, not with flat files.
This was the response to my question about this same issue some time ago.
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-June/021361.html
<http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-June/021361.html>
Regards,
Ricardo.--
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Tony Baartman [mailto:bart@global.co.za]
Enviado el: Martes, 06 de Septiembre de 2005 18:40
Para: 'Ricardo Martinez'; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Asunto: RE: [Serusers] IP Authentication
Thanks, looks spot on, thanks!
I seem to be battling with Syntax though:
I've added the following:
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/permissions.so"
modparam("permissions", "allow_trusted", "/tmp/trust_host")
if (allow_trusted()) {
log("GOT TRUSTED HOST");
break;
};
Error I get:
0(22784) parse error (69,20-21): Can't set module parameter
Line 69 is the modparam entry
Cheers
_____
From: Ricardo Martinez [mailto:rmartinez@redvoiss.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 11:44 PM
To: 'Tony Baartman'; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: RE: [Serusers] IP Authentication
If you mean authenticate or trust an endpoint based on the source ip,
Maybe the allow-trusted command could help you.
You can search more info in the README file from the permission module.
Regards,
Ricardo Martinez.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Tony Baartman [mailto:bart@global.co.za]
Enviado el: Martes, 06 de Septiembre de 2005 17:39
Para: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Asunto: [Serusers] IP Authentication
Hi All
Has anyone an idea on how to do SIP IP authentication based on originating
IP??
Please help
Thanx
Tony
If you mean authenticate or trust an endpoint based on the source ip,
Maybe the allow-trusted command could help you.
You can search more info in the README file from the permission module.
Regards,
Ricardo Martinez.-
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Tony Baartman [mailto:bart@global.co.za]
Enviado el: Martes, 06 de Septiembre de 2005 17:39
Para: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Asunto: [Serusers] IP Authentication
Hi All
Has anyone an idea on how to do SIP IP authentication based on originating
IP??
Please help
Thanx
Tony
Dear Friends,
I am trying to replace the "From" header field with "anonymous" and then
test
the "From" header field to see if it contains "anonymous". When the
"search"
is executed, it can not find the "anonymous" in the From header field
although
it seems to have been replaced successfully.
Does anyone know what the problem is?
Thanks
Ramin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
"replace" and "search"
replace("^From:(.*)>" , "From: \"Anonymous\"
<sip:anonymous@anonymous.com>");
if (search("^(f|F)rom:.*(a|A)nonymous"))
{
log(3, "From field tested WAS
Anonymous\n");
}
else
{
log(3, "From field tested NOT
Anonymous\n");
}
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
Hi,
I have set up a SER server and am testing it for REGISTER request.
I am sending following REGISTER request to the server and am
expecting that I would be able to verify the user's name
(registration details) at the server:
REGISTER sip:myserver.mydomain.com:5060 SIP/2.0
Call-ID: 5475652053--157538614(a)129.145.166.238
CSeq: 1 REGISTER
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
129.178.196.238:5060;branch=z9hG4bK313132363033333530393230322d353734313338393938313634333738373537
Max-Forwards: 70
Contact: <sip:anonymous@129.145.166.238:5060;transport=udp>
From: <sip:user@myserver.mydomain.com>;tag=1926937886
To: <sip:user@myserver.mydomain.com>
I would like to know how I can verify user's registration at the
SER? I tried server monitoring at the SER using
"/usr/sfw/sbin/serctl moni"; but I did not get much information. I
found that whenever I am sending above request to the server, I see
a change in Transaction statistics - it changes from 0 to 70 as in
the following:
.........
Transaction Statistics
Current: 70 (70 waiting) Total:
.........
Apart from this I don't see much change. How to verify user's
registration at the server? Is above REGISTER request correct?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Bhaskar...
Hello,
if there are people on this mailing list going to VoN and want to meet
others, then drop in boot #943 to chat a bit (or more ... :-) ). I and
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu will be there.
Daniel