sr-users February 2006

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

189 participants
374 discussions

[Serusers] postgresql.conf with Radius
by Voipers Portugal 06 Feb '06

06 Feb '06

Hi, Does anyone has an accounting mechanism working with SER and Radius? I have it all working ok, but when the start and stop request comes to Radius server, it does not write it to the postgres BD. Could anyone provide or let me know where i can find the postgresql.conf file that is supposed to be in the Radius Server machine? Regards, Jose Simoes

1 0

[Users] SIP Session Timeout
by martin＠campus-merseburg.de 06 Feb '06

06 Feb '06

Hi, could i add a Session-Expires header in an invite-request so that the sip session has the sip session timer support? ciao, martin

2 1

Re: Re: [Serusers] radius with ser
by Kenny Yeh 06 Feb '06

06 Feb '06

Greger V. Teigre,Hi I got a new debug information below: Feb 6 16:48:14 debian3 ser: ERROR: auth_radius: can't get code for the Sip-URI-User attribute Feb 6 16:48:14 debian3 ser: init_mod(): Error while initializing module auth_radius what do you think about those? Kenny ======= 2006-02-06 17:53:27 您在来信中写道：======= >See further above in your log. You probably have an error when ser tries to >load the radius module. Probably because the radiusclient library is not >found. >g-) >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Kenny Yeh" <kenny(a)artdio.com.tw> >To: <serusers(a)iptel.org> >Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 10:42 AM >Subject: [Serusers] radius with ser > > >> Hi, >> >> I have a big problems.I followed radius howto file where I found on >> iptel.org,and tested freeradius.when I run ser start,I found some error in >> syslog below: >> >> Feb 6 03:36:39 debian ser: find_export: <radius_www_authorize> not >> found >> Feb 6 03:36:39 debian ser: find_export: <radius_www_authorize> not found >> Feb 6 03:36:39 debian ser: parse error (137,36-37): unknown command, >> missing loadmodule? >> >> I loaded auth_radius.so from ser.cfg,why ser cann't found >> radius_www????? >> >> who can help me!!!! thx!!! >> >> >> Kenny >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Serusers mailing list >> Serusers(a)iptel.org >> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> > = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 　　　　　　　　致礼！　　　　　　　　Kenny Yeh 　　　　　　　　kenny(a)artdio.com.tw 　　　　　　　　　　2006-02-06

2 1

[Users] TOS setting for SIP signalling
by Matteo Piazza 06 Feb '06

06 Feb '06

Hi, I don't understand if the Tos setting is insert in the CVS of 1.0.0 version or it is in the devel branch. Thank's Matteo

2 1

Re: [Users] Problems registering NAT clients
by Jesus Rodriguez 06 Feb '06

06 Feb '06

On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Paco Orozco wrote: Hola Paco, I Cc: to the list. >> You can see here that the NAT device is changing the source port from >> 5060 to 10145, which is the port used by Openser to send the reply. >> Openser is doing fine while your NAT device is doing wrong because it >> keeps the external rewriten source port when sending the packet to the >> internal side of the NAT (see the second line of the above tcpdump >> trace). > > You are right, I was confused because I thought that Openser was > answer me wrong. > >> Which NAT device/router are you using?. Are you forwarding ports from >> the external to the internal side at the NAT device?. > > My NAT device is a 3Com Office Connect 812. A typical ADSL router. I > haven't got any forwarding ports external to internal? > > How can i solve this? Upgrade the firmware of the router. That model is already known because the NAT management problems for UDP packets. With the last firmware version the problem should be fixed. Saludos JesusR. ------------------------------- Jesus Rodriguez VozTelecom Sistemas, S.L. jesusr(a)voztele.com http://www.voztele.com Tel. 902360305 -------------------------------

1 0

[Serusers] radius with ser
by Kenny Yeh 06 Feb '06

06 Feb '06

Hi, I have a big problems.I followed radius howto file where I found on iptel.org,and tested freeradius.when I run ser start,I found some error in syslog below: Feb 6 03:36:39 debian ser: find_export: <radius_www_authorize> not found Feb 6 03:36:39 debian ser: find_export: <radius_www_authorize> not found Feb 6 03:36:39 debian ser: parse error (137,36-37): unknown command, missing loadmodule? I loaded auth_radius.so from ser.cfg,why ser cann't found radius_www????? who can help me!!!! thx!!! Kenny

2 1

[Serusers]Problem with AS5300 to SER
by 昂達 06 Feb '06

06 Feb '06

Hello : This is my AS5300 DID(direct-inward-dial) configuration *********************************************** ! dial-peer voice 101 pots incoming called-number 41000.T no digit-strip direct-inward-dial port 1:D forward-digits all ! dial-peer voice 102 voip huntstop application session destination-pattern 41000.T rtp payload-type nte 98 voice-class codec 99 session protocol sipv2 session target sip-server dtmf-relay rtp-nte ! sip-ua retry invite 3 retry response 3 retry bye 3 retry cancel 3 timers expires 300000 timers connect 300 sip-server ipv4:10.0.0.1 ! **************************************************** I wanna call AS5300 to SER , I use "csim start [DID number]" command but it show this error message: csim err csimDisconnected recvd DISC cid(503) csim: loop = 1, failed = 1 csim: call attempted = 1, setup failed = 1, tone failed = 0 and I use " show call history voice " command I find that : DisconnectText=bearer capability not authorized (57) Do you see any other solution for this problem? Regards, Hunter

1 0

[Users] record_route_preset(): No memory left
by Bastian Schern 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

Hello to all, I'm using the latest CVS 1_0_0 and I got the following message in the log after a "record_route_preset( "213.191.xxx.xxx:5060;nat=yes" )": record_route_preset(): No memory left Why this comes? Regards Bastian ____________ Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit Version: AVK 16.5138 from 28.01.2006 Virus news: www.antiviruslab.com

2 17

[Serusers] rtpproxy and fax clients under linux nat
by Antanas Masevicius 04 Feb '06

04 Feb '06

Hello, latetly i got a bit confused while playing with rtpproxy. It is said that it supports nat clients with symmetric nat. As i know, linux is also symmetric by default. Now i get into situation where my natted clients work for voice, but does not for fax. I traced that my nat does not forward incomming T38 stream saying "destination unreachable (port unreachable)". After looking at ip_conntrack during audio call i see: udp 17 180 src=192.168.0.46 dst=my.rtpproxy.ip sport=4004 dport=19006 src=my.rtpproxy.ip dst=my.external.ip sport=19006 dport=1024 [ASSURED] use=1 udp 17 29 src=192.168.0.46 dst=my.rtpproxy.ip sport=4005 dport=19007 [UNREPLIED] src=my.rtpproxy.ip dst=my.external.ip sport=19007 dport=4005 use=1 udp 17 171 src=192.168.0.46 dst=my.rtpproxy.ip sport=5069 dport=5060 src=my.rtpproxy.ip dst=my.external.ip sport=5060 dport=5069 [ASSURED] use=1 but looking at first line it doesn't seem like symmetric nat, it is clear that packets out of my.external.ip goes with low (1024) sports. Should it be like so or my linux masquarading is misconfigured? This audio session work ok for some reasons unknown to me. Can anyone explain the behaviour? >From second line we can see that packect can't reach 4005 port. Similar problem prevents me from receiving t38 stream i guess. How do you configure your linux natting for set up with rtpproxy? Antanas NTT

1 0

[Users] Problems registering NAT clients
by Paco Orozco 04 Feb '06

04 Feb '06

Hello, First of all, I'm spanish and my english isn't good, so please excuse my mistakes. I've been working with openser for a year. Now I'm modifying my SIP service in order to allow clients in NAT scenarios. I've read about symmetric / full cone / ... and other NAT scenarios. I've read about mediaproxy / rtpproxy and nathelper modules. I've got a openser.cfg working properly without NAT clients. And I've modified it (see attach). Client X-Lite: IP: 192.168.1.2 (public address 81.39.220.5) Listen SIP port: 5060 Listen RTP port: 8000 Server: Openser 1.0 with Media Proxy IP: 147.83.197.39 Config in opernser.cfg If i try to register with a UAC (X-Lite or K-Phone) with symmetric NAT scenario. Opernser server doesn't answer the client to 5060 port, as i need. X-Lite Diagnostic LOG is client_messages.txt Client timed out without receiving any server messages. This is a tcpdump on clients side: 17:42:23.458980 IP 192.168.1.2.5060 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 448 17:42:23.558019 IP 147.83.197.39.5060 > 192.168.1.2.10145: SIP, length: 538 17:42:23.558077 IP 192.168.1.2 > 147.83.197.39: ICMP 192.168.1.2 udp port 10145 unreachable, length 556 17:42:25.085485 IP 192.168.1.2.5060 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 448 17:42:28.108960 IP 192.168.1.2.5060 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 448 17:42:32.643903 IP 192.168.1.2.5060 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 2 17:42:34.156151 IP 192.168.1.2.5060 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 448 On the server this is the tcpdump: 17:42:23.904035 IP 81.39.220.5.10145 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 448 17:42:23.904261 IP 147.83.197.39.5060 > 81.39.220.5.10145: SIP, length: 538 17:42:23.905028 IP 147.83.197.39.5060 > 81.39.220.5.10145: SIP, length: 680 17:42:24.004623 IP 81.39.220.5 > 147.83.197.39: ICMP 81.39.220.5 udp port 10145 unreachable, length 556 17:42:25.525470 IP 81.39.220.5.10145 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 448 17:42:25.525607 IP 147.83.197.39.5060 > 81.39.220.5.10145: SIP, length: 538 17:42:25.526314 IP 147.83.197.39.5060 > 81.39.220.5.10145: SIP, length: 680 17:42:28.549322 IP 81.39.220.5.10145 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 448 What's wrong? It's necessary to use a STUN server? Why can't register? Why openser doesn't reply to 5060 port? My client it's only reachable in this. Can anyone help me? Anyone have a OpenSer config working? Thanks in advance -- ------------------------------------- Aquel que planta árboles bajo los que sabe muy bien que nunca se sentara, ha descubierto el auténtico significado de la vida.

2 1

← Newer
1
...
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
...
38
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users February 2006