sr-users February 2006

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

189 participants
374 discussions

[Users] Problems registering NAT clients
by Paco Orozco 04 Feb '06

04 Feb '06

Hello, The last message was mailformed.... sorry First of all, I'm spanish and my english isn't good, so please excuse my mistakes. I've been working with openser for a year. Now I'm modifying my SIP service in order to allow clients in NAT scenarios. I've read about symmetric / full cone / ... and other NAT scenarios. I've read about mediaproxy / rtpproxy and nathelper modules. I've got a openser.cfg working properly without NAT clients. And I've modified it (see attach). Client X-Lite: IP: 192.168.1.2 (public address 81.39.220.5) Listen SIP port: 5060 Listen RTP port: 8000 Server: Openser 1.0 with Media Proxy IP: 147.83.197.39 Config in opernser.cfg If i try to register with a UAC (X-Lite or K-Phone) with symmetric NAT scenario. Opernser server doesn't answer the client to 5060 port, as i need. X-Lite Diagnostic LOG is client_messages.txt Client timed out without receiving any server messages. This is a tcpdump on clients side: 17:42:23.458980 IP 192.168.1.2.5060 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 448 17:42:23.558019 IP 147.83.197.39.5060 > 192.168.1.2.10145: SIP, length: 538 17:42:23.558077 IP 192.168.1.2 > 147.83.197.39: ICMP 192.168.1.2 udp port 10145 unreachable, length 556 17:42:25.085485 IP 192.168.1.2.5060 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 448 17:42:28.108960 IP 192.168.1.2.5060 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 448 17:42:32.643903 IP 192.168.1.2.5060 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 2 17:42:34.156151 IP 192.168.1.2.5060 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 448 On the server this is the tcpdump: 17:42:23.904035 IP 81.39.220.5.10145 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 448 17:42:23.904261 IP 147.83.197.39.5060 > 81.39.220.5.10145: SIP, length: 538 17:42:23.905028 IP 147.83.197.39.5060 > 81.39.220.5.10145: SIP, length: 680 17:42:24.004623 IP 81.39.220.5 > 147.83.197.39: ICMP 81.39.220.5 udp port 10145 unreachable, length 556 17:42:25.525470 IP 81.39.220.5.10145 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 448 17:42:25.525607 IP 147.83.197.39.5060 > 81.39.220.5.10145: SIP, length: 538 17:42:25.526314 IP 147.83.197.39.5060 > 81.39.220.5.10145: SIP, length: 680 17:42:28.549322 IP 81.39.220.5.10145 > 147.83.197.39.5060: SIP, length: 448 What's wrong? It's necessary to use a STUN server? Why can't register? Why openser doesn't reply to 5060 port? My client it's only reachable in this. Can anyone help me? Anyone have a OpenSer config working? Thanks in advance -- ------------------------------------- Aquel que planta árboles bajo los que sabe muy bien que nunca se sentara, ha descubierto el auténtico significado de la vida.

1 0

[Users] user is not found
by Brijesh 04 Feb '06

04 Feb '06

Hi all I am new to OpenSER. I am using one of sip client. I want to connect sip clients through openSER proxy I have installed it and configured the clients but giving me error that user is not found Can anyone tell me what is reason for it ?

1 0

[Serusers] Problem with ACK and BYE..
by pankaj.munjal＠wipro.com 04 Feb '06

04 Feb '06

Hi everyone, I've configured ser to work with semstalkflite module of sems. This is how it works: A user calls up sip:READOUTTHISTEXT@ser and ser should be able to play back "READ OUT THIS TEXT" using a media server(sems). Now it seems to be working fine, but, after having a INVITE-200OK-ACK dialog b/w ser and caller "A", ser is not absorbing the ACK. i,e, for some reason, Caller "A" keeps sending ACK again and again. FYI.. caller "A" uses X-lite. Here is the part of the ser config file that i've modified: if (method=="ACK"){ log(1,"Pankaj --> I've hit ACK!! "); # absorb ACKs break; }; Isn't it good enuf to absorb the incoming ACKs? Anyone with any pointers?? Thanks in advance, Pankaj Munjal The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com

1 0

[Serusers] firewall
by Toygun Mavinil 04 Feb '06

04 Feb '06

Hi, I use ser 0.9.6 on fc4 Ser Works with no problem but Firewall is closed I use ser with mediaproxy and sems (trying) Which ports i have to left open while enabling the firewall? Toygun

1 0

Re: [Users] Using uac_replace_from to munge username between ser and Asterisk?
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

if you enable auto from_restore_mode, you do not need to perform any restore from script. Just replace the from in the initial INVITE and this is it - all replies and sequential request would be auto fixed (restore/replace). regards, bogdan Barry Flanagan wrote: > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > >> Hi Barry, >> >> have you set auto from restoring? See: >> http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.1.x/uac.html#AEN75 > > > Yes, but I am not sure where it is supposed to go. > > I have the following in just before relaying to Asterisk: > > rewritehostport("XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:5060"); > uac_replace_from("$fn","sip:$au_$ar@$fd"); > append_hf("P-hint: GATEWAY\r\n"); > t_relay("udp:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:5060"); > > > and I put in uac_restore_from(); just after the record_route() > > > with all the other modparams I have: > > modparam("uac","from_restore_mode","auto") > > > Thanks for the help. > > -Barry > > >> regards, >> bogdan >> >> Barry Flanagan wrote: >> >>> >>> So, the only way around it that I can see is to somehow have OpenSER >>> change the username to username_domain so that each will be unique. >>> >>> It looks like uac_from_replace should handle this. I have tried it, >>> and I can see that Asterisk does in fact get user_domain@domain in >>> the first invite, but thereafter for some reason OpenSER changes it >>> to just _@domain for subsequent requests. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> -Barry >>> > >

2 5

[Users] Receiving different VIA in INVITE and CANCEL
by Papadopoulos Georgios 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

Hello, I have an issue with some user agents, (Linksys PAP2 and Sipura 3000) sending different Via in CANCEL than in INVITE. Of course the result is that the caller hangs up and the callee keeps ringing. I tried to use modparam("tm", "via1_matching", 0) but it did not solve the problem. I have two questions: 1. Is the via1_matching in TM working as described or is it broken? 2. What can be causing this behavior of the user agent? Not all our users who have these user agents report this problem (actually very few have the problem). In our lab we tried same user agent, same firmware but could never reproduce this behavior no matter how bad we tried to mess up their configuration. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks. George Disclaimer The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorized to, and must not, read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

2 1

[Serusers] No comunication between user through SER. S.O.S.
by Ernesto Garcia 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

Hi!!, I'm very new to this topic, I'm building a call center and I testing with Asterisk and SER, the problem is that when some registered user call to other user tha is registered too the phone of it don't detect the incoming call. Plase, what well be is the problem ? Ernesto

1 0

Re: [Serusers] high-availibility setup using f5 bigip
by Jack Wei 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

I want to set up 2 SER boxes and 2 Asterisk boxes using 192.168.1.X IPs. I set up 2 VIPs, 1 for SER and 1 for Asterisk. SER redirect voice mail calls to Asterisk VIP. However, if you look at the SIP logs, Asterisk is using a 192.168.1.X IP for the contact address. Also, there is no audio since the SDP is using the 192.168.1.X IP. I've set the externip and localnet in Asterisk but nothing happened. My goal is to set up a load-balancing pools of SER and Asterisk behind a BIGIP switch. --- Charles Wang <lazy.charles(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I think that the range of this question is too large. > You should tell us what your scenario is. And tell us more about your > configurations. > > 2006/2/2, Jack Wei <cowlemon(a)yahoo.com>: > > hi, > > > > I'm trying to set up 2 SER and 2 Asterisks boxes using a bigip switch to do > > load-balancing. I'm using Asterisk as a voicemail application only and > have > > successfully integrated SER with Asterisk without the switch. But when I > try > > to use the switch as a load-balancer, I get lots of NAT problems. Does > anyone > > know how to setup the switch and SER/Asterisk properly? > > > > Thanks, > > Jack > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > -- > > Best Regards > Charles > Jack Wei __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

[Serusers] serctl, mysql and presence snapshot
by victoria beltran 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

>The reason is, that in this version (or some little older) has changed >the database structure and serctl is broken there (most serctl commands >are unusable). > >Vaclav Then, I believe the serweb will not work successful either with the presence snapshot, Is this right? Thus, neither the serweb nor the serctl tool works. Therefore, Are mysql commands the single way to manage (i.e create and drop users) the ser server?? thanks! --------------------------------- LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com

2 1

[Serusers] serctl, mysql and presence snapshot
by victoria beltran 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

2 1

← Newer
1
...
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
...
38
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users February 2006