Hello to all
in the subscription page of serweb ( serweb/user/reg/index.php ) the
users can choose their timezone from a list.
But 95% of my users have the "Europe/Lisbon" timezone.
How can I put as default timezone "Europe/Lisbon", instead of the " -
select your timezone -" ?
Thanks
Joao Pereira
I've compiled and installed the sources successfully on a Sun Mircosystems
20z with Red Hat Enterprise v3 running the OS. When I try to use radius it
always fails to log the user in and authenticate with radius. If I run SER
on a 32 bit system with the same configurations as the 64 bit system it
works fine. After reading some documentation, I caught reference in regards
to radiusclient-ng only supported on 32 bit systems. Is this true?
The only thing that doesn't work is when a user tries to authenticate
through radius the authentication always fails on the 64 bit OS. Am I
missing any pre-configuration options prior to compiling on a 64 bit OS?
Please help.
~Alan
Error message received from debug:
pre_auth(): Credentials with given realm not found
Hi All,
I want to add the SOURCE IP Address attribute in radius requests of openser.
Can someone guide me through the steps needed to achieve this. I have
examples for doing the same for DB_extra but unable to achieve the same for
radius_extra.
Can someone post the cfg lines for achieving this?
Deepak Singhal
Hi,
i'm new in OpenSER and i like know, how i can hang up a current call?, i did
try it via fifo file, but i haven't found any command to do it.
Anybody can help me?
Regards.
--
Manuel A. Rubio "Bombadil"
Usuario de GNU/Linux #323628 acorde a http://counter.li.org/
GPG ID 1C84979D ftp://bosqueviejo.net/pub/bombadil.asc
Técnico en Admin. Sistemas Informáticos
on my machine,
ser 0.9.3 crashes as soon as a UA sends REGISTER message
on doing gdb ser corefile i get the following when calling 'bt'
(gdb) bt
#0 qm_malloc (qm=0x8107e00, size=760) at mem/q_malloc.c:290
#1 0x0806ce0e in receive_msg (
buf=0x80d6560 "REGISTER sip:194.255.1.199:5060 SIP/2.0\r\nFrom:
<sip:88515356@194.255.1.199>;tag=ccd4c5cb-13c4-2838-9d1b45-6d9e\r\nTo:
<sip:88515356@194.255.1.199>\r\nCall-ID:
ccd4c5cb-13c4-2838-9d1b45-7a20\r\nCSeq: 1 REGIS"...,
len=437, rcv_info=0xbfed0fe0) at receive.c:92
#2 0x0808421c in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:458
#3 0x0805ceaf in main_loop () at main.c:1032
#4 0x0805e50b in main (argc=2, argv=0xbfed11a4) at main.c:1568
(gdb) print h
$9 = 0
please help,
note that a similar setup on another machine works just fine.
tulika
Hi again,
I think I've found the problem. The client doesn't receive the packet from server because of network problems.
So I had to change the SIP port of my SIP Proxy to 5061
Now , following forward command does not work (SER still sends to 5060) , why ?
if (!t_forward_nonack("193.243.202.97", 5061)) {
log(1, "forward failed\n");
t_reply("500", "Forward failed");
}
Thanks,
ilker
________________________________
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 3:21 PM
To: Vaclav Kubart
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: RE: [Serusers] Ser as a presence server with other SIP proxy asregistrar and rtp proxy
Hi Vaclav,
Thanks for the information.
I changed my configuration for REGISTER messages and they were forwarded to my SIP proxy.
But the clien't can't connect. I think that's because of authentication requirement on my SIP proxy.
When I make the client connect directly to my SIP proxy I see the following SIP header on it:
12:09:22.967260: SIP: 193.243.202.97:5060 << 85.105.102.167:8359 payload: 792 bytes
REGISTER sip:193.243.202.97 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.6:8359;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-c2540260b6061b1e-1--d87543-;rport
Max-Forwards: 70
Contact: <sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.6:8359;rinstance=c314db726308b27a>
To: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97>
From: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97>;tag=f72f1c2c
Call-ID: 2748934b5d115c55@TkVUV09SS1lPTi5jb21wYW55MS50c3Q.
CSeq: 2 REGISTER
Expires: 3600
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO
Supported: eventlist
User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3014w stamp 26359
Authorization: Digest username="200000900568888888",realm="NcxSip",nonce="48058627",uri="sip:193.243.202.97",response="92be0838ca4f794d23d4bb3d34e12aa9",algorithm=MD5
Content-Length: 0
But if I make the client connect to SER and then forward the REGISTER message to my SIP proxy, I see the following SIP header arriving:
12:16:42.263635: SIP: 193.243.202.97:5060 << 193.243.207.107:10003 payload: 716 bytes
REGISTER sip:193.243.202.97 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.100.100.15;branch=z9hG4bKcee1.8c792d45.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.6:8359;received=85.105.102.167;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-aa1ee14dcf543535-1--d87543-;rport=10002
Max-Forwards: 16
Contact: <sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.6:8359;rinstance=2c28e04a9c62f011>
To: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97>
From: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97>;tag=d37fe827
Call-ID: 6d7923631c258f31@TkVUV09SS1lPTi5jb21wYW55MS50c3Q.
CSeq: 1 REGISTER
Expires: 3600
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO
Supported: eventlist
User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3014w stamp 26359
Content-Length: 0
It seems that when the SIP message is forwarded through SER, the Authorization information is missing.
How can I make SER to forward the message without modifying the message ?
Also how can I modify user and domain information for the forwarded messages ?
Thanks,
ilker
-----Original Message-----
From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 8:37 AM
To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ser as a presence server with other SIP proxy as registrar and rtp proxy
Hi,
your solution is possible - separated presence server from other SIP communication. For forwarding you need cfg like this:
if (method=="...") { # here put method name which should be forwarded
if (!t_newtran()) {
log(1, "newtran error\n");
sl_reply_error();
break;
};
if (!t_forward_nonack("machine.domain.com", 5060)) {
log(1, "forward failed\n");
t_reply("500", "Forward failed");
}
break;
}
I'm using SER as proxy and other SER as presence server. Proxy forwards presence related messages to presence server, it looks like:
C "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
Hi again,
I think I've found the problem. The client doesn't receive the packet from server because of network problems.
So I had to change the SIP port of my SIP Proxy to 5061
Now , following forward command does not work (SER still sends to 5060) , why ?
if (!t_forward_nonack("193.243.202.97", 5061)) {
log(1, "forward failed\n");
t_reply("500", "Forward failed");
}
Thanks,
ilker
________________________________
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 3:21 PM
To: Vaclav Kubart
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: RE: [Serusers] Ser as a presence server with other SIP proxy asregistrar and rtp proxy
Hi Vaclav,
Thanks for the information.
I changed my configuration for REGISTER messages and they were forwarded to my SIP proxy.
But the clien't can't connect. I think that's because of authentication requirement on my SIP proxy.
When I make the client connect directly to my SIP proxy I see the following SIP header on it:
12:09:22.967260: SIP: 193.243.202.97:5060 << 85.105.102.167:8359 payload: 792 bytes
REGISTER sip:193.243.202.97 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.6:8359;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-c2540260b6061b1e-1--d87543-;rport
Max-Forwards: 70
Contact: <sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.6:8359;rinstance=c314db726308b27a>
To: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97>
From: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97>;tag=f72f1c2c
Call-ID: 2748934b5d115c55@TkVUV09SS1lPTi5jb21wYW55MS50c3Q.
CSeq: 2 REGISTER
Expires: 3600
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO
Supported: eventlist
User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3014w stamp 26359
Authorization: Digest username="200000900568888888",realm="NcxSip",nonce="48058627",uri="sip:193.243.202.97",response="92be0838ca4f794d23d4bb3d34e12aa9",algorithm=MD5
Content-Length: 0
But if I make the client connect to SER and then forward the REGISTER message to my SIP proxy, I see the following SIP header arriving:
12:16:42.263635: SIP: 193.243.202.97:5060 << 193.243.207.107:10003 payload: 716 bytes
REGISTER sip:193.243.202.97 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.100.100.15;branch=z9hG4bKcee1.8c792d45.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.6:8359;received=85.105.102.167;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-aa1ee14dcf543535-1--d87543-;rport=10002
Max-Forwards: 16
Contact: <sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.6:8359;rinstance=2c28e04a9c62f011>
To: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97>
From: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97>;tag=d37fe827
Call-ID: 6d7923631c258f31@TkVUV09SS1lPTi5jb21wYW55MS50c3Q.
CSeq: 1 REGISTER
Expires: 3600
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO
Supported: eventlist
User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3014w stamp 26359
Content-Length: 0
It seems that when the SIP message is forwarded through SER, the Authorization information is missing.
How can I make SER to forward the message without modifying the message ?
Also how can I modify user and domain information for the forwarded messages ?
Thanks,
ilker
-----Original Message-----
From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 8:37 AM
To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ser as a presence server with other SIP proxy as registrar and rtp proxy
Hi,
your solution is possible - separated presence server from other SIP communication. For forwarding you need cfg like this:
if (method=="...") { # here put method name which should be forwarded
if (!t_newtran()) {
log(1, "newtran error\n");
sl_reply_error();
break;
};
if (!t_forward_nonack("machine.domain.com", 5060)) {
log(1, "forward failed\n");
t_reply("500", "Forward failed");
}
break;
}
I'm using SER as proxy and other SER as presence server. Proxy forwards presence related messages to presence server, it looks like:
<http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/03090F04/06044907/014D0A101813…>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez.
This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Hello to all
Did you ever made it to put a Cisco phone (Cisco IP phone 7940 with SIP)
behind ADSL (and NAT) and make calls??
Im trying to do it, and with X-Lite I can place calls, but with the
Cisco phone I cant... :(
I already putted the NAT= yes in the Cisco Phone.
Is there any way of doing this ?
Thanks
Joao Pereira
www.fccn.pt
Hi,
I am new to SER as our company previous administrator who looked after our SIP server has left the company and left no documentation.
Our server got restarted du to power failure and it is unable to start ser. This is what I am doing to start SER and I am getting following error.
/usr/local/sbin/ser -f /usr/local/etc/ser/ser_091105-noenum-full.cfg
and this is what I am getting in /var/log/messages file:
0(2772) parse error (81,38-39): unknown command, missing loadmodule?
0(2772) parse error (82,2-3): syntax error
0(2772) parse error (82,2-3): bad command
0(2772) parse error (82,4-8):
ERROR: bad config file (4 errors)
What I am trying to find out what is (81,38-39)?
is it line 81 column 38-39 or else also how can I fix this problem.
Please help me so I could get our phone system working again.
Regards
--
( Connecting You To The World )
SMS gigo to 82280 for our Contact Details
i am trying to use uac_auth() on CVS-HEAD but somewhere there is a problem
with missing record-route headers.
the SIP sessions looks like this:
client: INVITE
openser: SIP/2.0 100 trying
openser: SIP/2.0 183 Session progress
openser: SIP/2.0 200 Ok (no record-route!)
client: ACK (directly - not to openser because of missing rr)
so everything is fine until the remote end sends the Ok to OpenSER (which is
further relayed to the client). OpenSER doesn't insert a Record-Route header
and my client therefore sends the ACK directly to the remote-end instead of
sending it to OpenSER. as the remote-end expects the ACKs from OpenSER it
ignores them and after sending some further OKs it quits the sessions.
when i try the same thing using another destination (which doesn't go
through the uac_auth() stuff) it works fine (= rr header is inserted), so
i'm not sure if this is a bug in my config or OpenSER.
i have put my config online at:
http://pastebin.com/614703
the case where it works fine is when dialing a sip-uri. in this case
route[3] is called as INVITE handler which calls route[1] to relay the
message. the problem occurs when dialing a numeric uri. in this case
route[3] calls route[5] which is basically the same as route[1] with the
exception of using a uac_auth failure route and a t_relay to a specific
destination.
any hints about the cause of this problem?
bye,
/gst
Bogdan,
Well it must be related to Polycom phones in general then, because we have 35 or so deployed here and a _lot_ of them are doing it. I doubt it's a 'bad' phone... it must be something in the Polycom firmware.
Douglas.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro]
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 1:37 AM
> To: Douglas Garstang
> Cc: OpenSER
> Subject: Re: [Users] Error while parsing headers
>
>
> the error is generated if the header parsing failed (when
> searching for
> auth headers). You should got before more errors related to parsing.
>
> probably some UA sends bogus messages.
>
> regards,
> bogdan
>
> Douglas Garstang wrote:
>
> >Can someone tell me what this means? OpenSER is sending it
> to syslog regularly.
> >
> >find_credentials(): Error while parsing headers
> >
> >It seems to be tied to a registration, but isn't happening
> on all registrations, and even when it does happen, the
> registration still goes ok.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >Doug.
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Users mailing list
> >Users(a)openser.org
> >http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
> >
>
>