sr-users March 2006

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

223 participants
506 discussions

[Serusers] ERROR message : MySQL server has gone away
by "한승전" 13 Apr '06

13 Apr '06

please help..... If i restart MySQL(version 5.0.19), SER shows next error message. Mar 31 22:37:18 localhost /usr/local/sbin/ser[32701]: submit_query(): MySQL server has gone away Mar 31 22:37:18 localhost /usr/local/sbin/ser[32701]: submit_query(): Error while submitting query Mar 31 22:37:18 localhost /usr/local/sbin/ser[32701]: get_ha1(): Error while querying database Mar 31 22:37:22 localhost /usr/local/sbin/ser[32703]: Binding '1234(a)192.9.2.1','sip:1234@192.9.2.11:5060' has expired As appear in upside message, SER does not auto-reconnect to mysql. If MySQL restarted, SER must be able to do Auto-Reconnect. Is no there way that SER can do Auto-Reconnect to MySQL?

4 4

[Serusers] serweb tunning :)
by Joao Pereira 12 Apr '06

12 Apr '06

Hello to all in the subscription page of serweb ( serweb/user/reg/index.php ) the users can choose their timezone from a list. But 95% of my users have the "Europe/Lisbon" timezone. How can I put as default timezone "Europe/Lisbon", instead of the " - select your timezone -" ? Thanks Joao Pereira

3 3

[Serusers] SER and Radiusclient-ng on 64bit Linux OS
by Alan 11 Apr '06

11 Apr '06

I've compiled and installed the sources successfully on a Sun Mircosystems 20z with Red Hat Enterprise v3 running the OS. When I try to use radius it always fails to log the user in and authenticate with radius. If I run SER on a 32 bit system with the same configurations as the 64 bit system it works fine. After reading some documentation, I caught reference in regards to radiusclient-ng only supported on 32 bit systems. Is this true? The only thing that doesn't work is when a user tries to authenticate through radius the authentication always fails on the 64 bit OS. Am I missing any pre-configuration options prior to compiling on a 64 bit OS? Please help. ~Alan Error message received from debug: pre_auth(): Credentials with given realm not found

2 1

[Users] Radius_extra in ACC
by Deepak Singhal 10 Apr '06

10 Apr '06

Hi All, I want to add the SOURCE IP Address attribute in radius requests of openser. Can someone guide me through the steps needed to achieve this. I have examples for doing the same for DB_extra but unable to achieve the same for radius_extra. Can someone post the cfg lines for achieving this? Deepak Singhal

3 4

[Users] External actions
by Manuel Ángel Rubio Jiménez 05 Apr '06

05 Apr '06

Hi, i'm new in OpenSER and i like know, how i can hang up a current call?, i did try it via fifo file, but i haven't found any command to do it. Anybody can help me? Regards. -- Manuel A. Rubio "Bombadil" Usuario de GNU/Linux #323628 acorde a http://counter.li.org/ GPG ID 1C84979D ftp://bosqueviejo.net/pub/bombadil.asc Técnico en Admin. Sistemas Informáticos

6 9

[Serusers] ser 0.9.3 crash
by Tulika Pradhan 04 Apr '06

04 Apr '06

on my machine, ser 0.9.3 crashes as soon as a UA sends REGISTER message on doing gdb ser corefile i get the following when calling 'bt' (gdb) bt #0 qm_malloc (qm=0x8107e00, size=760) at mem/q_malloc.c:290 #1 0x0806ce0e in receive_msg ( buf=0x80d6560 "REGISTER sip:194.255.1.199:5060 SIP/2.0\r\nFrom: <sip:88515356@194.255.1.199>;tag=ccd4c5cb-13c4-2838-9d1b45-6d9e\r\nTo: <sip:88515356@194.255.1.199>\r\nCall-ID: ccd4c5cb-13c4-2838-9d1b45-7a20\r\nCSeq: 1 REGIS"..., len=437, rcv_info=0xbfed0fe0) at receive.c:92 #2 0x0808421c in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:458 #3 0x0805ceaf in main_loop () at main.c:1032 #4 0x0805e50b in main (argc=2, argv=0xbfed11a4) at main.c:1568 (gdb) print h $9 = 0 please help, note that a similar setup on another machine works just fine. tulika

2 4

RE: [Serusers] Ser as a presence server with other SIP proxy asregistrar and rtp proxy
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 04 Apr '06

04 Apr '06

Hi again, I think I've found the problem. The client doesn't receive the packet from server because of network problems. So I had to change the SIP port of my SIP Proxy to 5061 Now , following forward command does not work (SER still sends to 5060) , why ? if (!t_forward_nonack("193.243.202.97", 5061)) { log(1, "forward failed\n"); t_reply("500", "Forward failed"); } Thanks, ilker ________________________________ From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 3:21 PM To: Vaclav Kubart Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] Ser as a presence server with other SIP proxy asregistrar and rtp proxy Hi Vaclav, Thanks for the information. I changed my configuration for REGISTER messages and they were forwarded to my SIP proxy. But the clien't can't connect. I think that's because of authentication requirement on my SIP proxy. When I make the client connect directly to my SIP proxy I see the following SIP header on it: 12:09:22.967260: SIP: 193.243.202.97:5060 << 85.105.102.167:8359 payload: 792 bytes REGISTER sip:193.243.202.97 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.6:8359;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-c2540260b6061b1e-1--d87543-;rport Max-Forwards: 70 Contact: <sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.6:8359;rinstance=c314db726308b27a> To: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97> From: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97>;tag=f72f1c2c Call-ID: 2748934b5d115c55@TkVUV09SS1lPTi5jb21wYW55MS50c3Q. CSeq: 2 REGISTER Expires: 3600 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO Supported: eventlist User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3014w stamp 26359 Authorization: Digest username="200000900568888888",realm="NcxSip",nonce="48058627",uri="sip:193.243.202.97",response="92be0838ca4f794d23d4bb3d34e12aa9",algorithm=MD5 Content-Length: 0 But if I make the client connect to SER and then forward the REGISTER message to my SIP proxy, I see the following SIP header arriving: 12:16:42.263635: SIP: 193.243.202.97:5060 << 193.243.207.107:10003 payload: 716 bytes REGISTER sip:193.243.202.97 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.100.100.15;branch=z9hG4bKcee1.8c792d45.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.6:8359;received=85.105.102.167;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-aa1ee14dcf543535-1--d87543-;rport=10002 Max-Forwards: 16 Contact: <sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.6:8359;rinstance=2c28e04a9c62f011> To: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97> From: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97>;tag=d37fe827 Call-ID: 6d7923631c258f31@TkVUV09SS1lPTi5jb21wYW55MS50c3Q. CSeq: 1 REGISTER Expires: 3600 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO Supported: eventlist User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3014w stamp 26359 Content-Length: 0 It seems that when the SIP message is forwarded through SER, the Authorization information is missing. How can I make SER to forward the message without modifying the message ? Also how can I modify user and domain information for the forwarded messages ? Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 8:37 AM To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ser as a presence server with other SIP proxy as registrar and rtp proxy Hi, your solution is possible - separated presence server from other SIP communication. For forwarding you need cfg like this: if (method=="...") { # here put method name which should be forwarded if (!t_newtran()) { log(1, "newtran error\n"); sl_reply_error(); break; }; if (!t_forward_nonack("machine.domain.com", 5060)) { log(1, "forward failed\n"); t_reply("500", "Forward failed"); } break; } I'm using SER as proxy and other SER as presence server. Proxy forwards presence related messages to presence server, it looks like: C "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> Hi again, I think I've found the problem. The client doesn't receive the packet from server because of network problems. So I had to change the SIP port of my SIP Proxy to 5061 Now , following forward command does not work (SER still sends to 5060) , why ? if (!t_forward_nonack("193.243.202.97", 5061)) { log(1, "forward failed\n"); t_reply("500", "Forward failed"); } Thanks, ilker ________________________________ From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 3:21 PM To: Vaclav Kubart Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] Ser as a presence server with other SIP proxy asregistrar and rtp proxy Hi Vaclav, Thanks for the information. I changed my configuration for REGISTER messages and they were forwarded to my SIP proxy. But the clien't can't connect. I think that's because of authentication requirement on my SIP proxy. When I make the client connect directly to my SIP proxy I see the following SIP header on it: 12:09:22.967260: SIP: 193.243.202.97:5060 << 85.105.102.167:8359 payload: 792 bytes REGISTER sip:193.243.202.97 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.6:8359;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-c2540260b6061b1e-1--d87543-;rport Max-Forwards: 70 Contact: <sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.6:8359;rinstance=c314db726308b27a> To: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97> From: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97>;tag=f72f1c2c Call-ID: 2748934b5d115c55@TkVUV09SS1lPTi5jb21wYW55MS50c3Q. CSeq: 2 REGISTER Expires: 3600 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO Supported: eventlist User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3014w stamp 26359 Authorization: Digest username="200000900568888888",realm="NcxSip",nonce="48058627",uri="sip:193.243.202.97",response="92be0838ca4f794d23d4bb3d34e12aa9",algorithm=MD5 Content-Length: 0 But if I make the client connect to SER and then forward the REGISTER message to my SIP proxy, I see the following SIP header arriving: 12:16:42.263635: SIP: 193.243.202.97:5060 << 193.243.207.107:10003 payload: 716 bytes REGISTER sip:193.243.202.97 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.100.100.15;branch=z9hG4bKcee1.8c792d45.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.6:8359;received=85.105.102.167;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-aa1ee14dcf543535-1--d87543-;rport=10002 Max-Forwards: 16 Contact: <sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.6:8359;rinstance=2c28e04a9c62f011> To: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97> From: "900568888888"<sip:200000900568888888@193.243.202.97>;tag=d37fe827 Call-ID: 6d7923631c258f31@TkVUV09SS1lPTi5jb21wYW55MS50c3Q. CSeq: 1 REGISTER Expires: 3600 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO Supported: eventlist User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3014w stamp 26359 Content-Length: 0 It seems that when the SIP message is forwarded through SER, the Authorization information is missing. How can I make SER to forward the message without modifying the message ? Also how can I modify user and domain information for the forwarded messages ? Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 8:37 AM To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ser as a presence server with other SIP proxy as registrar and rtp proxy Hi, your solution is possible - separated presence server from other SIP communication. For forwarding you need cfg like this: if (method=="...") { # here put method name which should be forwarded if (!t_newtran()) { log(1, "newtran error\n"); sl_reply_error(); break; }; if (!t_forward_nonack("machine.domain.com", 5060)) { log(1, "forward failed\n"); t_reply("500", "Forward failed"); } break; } I'm using SER as proxy and other SER as presence server. Proxy forwards presence related messages to presence server, it looks like: <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/03090F04/06044907/014D0A101813…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 1

[Users] Cisco phone behind ADSL (with NAT)
by Joao Pereira 02 Apr '06

02 Apr '06

Hello to all Did you ever made it to put a Cisco phone (Cisco IP phone 7940 with SIP) behind ADSL (and NAT) and make calls?? Im trying to do it, and with X-Lite I can place calls, but with the Cisco phone I cant... :( I already putted the NAT= yes in the Cisco Phone. Is there any way of doing this ? Thanks Joao Pereira www.fccn.pt

3 4

[Serusers] HELP NEEDED
by Info 01 Apr '06

01 Apr '06

Hi, I am new to SER as our company previous administrator who looked after our SIP server has left the company and left no documentation. Our server got restarted du to power failure and it is unable to start ser. This is what I am doing to start SER and I am getting following error. /usr/local/sbin/ser -f /usr/local/etc/ser/ser_091105-noenum-full.cfg and this is what I am getting in /var/log/messages file: 0(2772) parse error (81,38-39): unknown command, missing loadmodule? 0(2772) parse error (82,2-3): syntax error 0(2772) parse error (82,2-3): bad command 0(2772) parse error (82,4-8): ERROR: bad config file (4 errors) What I am trying to find out what is (81,38-39)? is it line 81 column 38-39 or else also how can I fix this problem. Please help me so I could get our phone system working again. Regards -- ( Connecting You To The World ) SMS gigo to 82280 for our Contact Details

5 10

[Users] missing record-route when using uac_auth()
by Günther Starnberger 31 Mar '06

31 Mar '06

i am trying to use uac_auth() on CVS-HEAD but somewhere there is a problem with missing record-route headers. the SIP sessions looks like this: client: INVITE openser: SIP/2.0 100 trying openser: SIP/2.0 183 Session progress openser: SIP/2.0 200 Ok (no record-route!) client: ACK (directly - not to openser because of missing rr) so everything is fine until the remote end sends the Ok to OpenSER (which is further relayed to the client). OpenSER doesn't insert a Record-Route header and my client therefore sends the ACK directly to the remote-end instead of sending it to OpenSER. as the remote-end expects the ACKs from OpenSER it ignores them and after sending some further OKs it quits the sessions. when i try the same thing using another destination (which doesn't go through the uac_auth() stuff) it works fine (= rr header is inserted), so i'm not sure if this is a bug in my config or OpenSER. i have put my config online at: http://pastebin.com/614703 the case where it works fine is when dialing a sip-uri. in this case route[3] is called as INVITE handler which calls route[1] to relay the message. the problem occurs when dialing a numeric uri. in this case route[3] calls route[5] which is basically the same as route[1] with the exception of using a uac_auth failure route and a t_relay to a specific destination. any hints about the cause of this problem? bye, /gst

3 12

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2006