Please stop to annoy people by contacting them thru google talk and
private mail Mr Aman Sachdeva.
Seems that i am not alone to complain about that.
Olivier
Hi Dani,
The closest idea I have in mind is to load into an avp the result of
a mysql query, which returns a random number or entries from a
database sorted randomly.
But for this you to work you would need to use OpenSER devel branch,
not sure if equivalent SER functionality exists.
See http://openser.org/docs/modules/devel/avpops.html#AEN268
Adrian
>>>>>>>
Like Adrian said: i'm not intend to test any IMS platform.
So, Adrian, do you have any ser module witch can do that ?
Dani
Bogdan, I don't understand how to make this with openser.
but I understand the keepalive mechanism
can you help me?
best regards
Javier Ramirez
----- Original Message -----
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
To: Javier Ramirez
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] keep alive using RE-INVITE
Javier,
I guess the RFC3261 or google (SIP + reINVITE) are the best source for
looking into.
regards,
bogdan
Javier Ramirez wrote:
> Bogdan,
> I read that a lot of person use the RE-INVITE to keepalive the call
> but I don´t understand this.
> please, can you help me ?
> best regards
> Javier Ramirez
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro>
> *To:* Javier Ramirez <mailto:jvr_78@yahoo.com.ar>
> *Cc:* users(a)openser.org <mailto:users@openser.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:14 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Users] keep alive using RE-INVITE
>
> Hi Javier,
>
> this is quite impossible to do - by sending re-INVITEs from a middle
> point, you will break the CSEQ consistency between the end points.
> Within the dialog, the cseq must increase from message to message
> - if
> you send a re-invite to point A with cseq n+1, after a while point
> B may
> sent a request with the same cseq since it was not aware that some
> party
> in the middle changed the number.
>
> the best way to do it is if you have a end2end keepalive mechanism as
> Session-Timer.
>
> regards,
> bogdan
>
> Javier Ramirez wrote:
>
> > Hi !
> > I looking for a mechanism to keep alive, and I see that is used the
> > RE-INVITE, but
> > How to use the Re-INVITE to a keep alive mechanism ?
> > exist another way to implement another keep alive mechanism ?
> >
> > best regards
> > Javier ramirez
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Users mailing list
> >Users(a)openser.org
> >http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
>
>
> __________ NOD32 1.1586 (20060608) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
__________ NOD32 1.1611 (20060620) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
Hi Users,,
Till I'm in confuse ,,, That I use openser , UAC are Behind NAT and Not
Behind NAT .
I'm Using the rtpproxy...
But Confuse here which is one the following the Besr .
Is rtpproxy or mediaproxy...
In here ... When I using rtpproxy...
1) openser server is not requesting and respondes the 'BYE "
2 ) two back the Voice is clearly listen in softphones and after that voice
is hearing
Please..
--
Thanks and Regards with cheers
Sunkara Ravi Prakash (Voip Developer)
Hyperion Technology
www.hyperion-tech.com
Hi,
Under heavy load, I sometimes get log messages like these:
ERROR:tm:t_should_relay_response: status rewrite by UAS: stored: 408,
received: 100
ERROR:tm:t_should_relay_response: status rewrite by UAS: stored: 408,
received: 180
It doesn't seem to be critical because the calls are established
successfully, so is this really an error? If not, can we decrease the
log priority or even only print it in debug mode?
Andy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: martin(a)campus-merseburg.de [mailto:martin@campus-merseburg.de]
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 5:40 AM
> To: users(a)openser.org
> Subject: Re: [Users] Reload Config-File
>
>
>
> Am 28.4.2006 schrieb "martin" <martin(a)campus-merseburg.de>:
>
> >
> >Is there a way to reload the configfile of openser without
> restarting it?
> >the hup signal doesnt work.
> >
>
> Ok. Nevermind.
> Q: Is it possible to reload OpenSER's configuration file with
> a signal?
>
> A: No. To reload the configuration file, OpenSER must be restarted.
>
> Would be a nice "carrier-grade" feature.
I second that. It would definitely be nice.
The test is against regulatory bodies in some countries that allow
only certain CLIs to be presented.
IMSs is step farther away in the pipeline
Adrian
/////////
Hi Dani,
Im not entirely sure about that random number problem you are trying
to solve, but I think it's not currently possible. You may try looking
into avops module though...
Yet I have another couple of questions:
1. Are you trying to test an IMS platform?
2. If, yes, then which one?
Andrey.
hello,
I am interested to know if I can test for the IP address ot the "next
hoop" after loose_route().
I see that isdsturiset() does not take any parameter.
for the moment I use something like
if(search("^Route:.*IP_ADDRESS_TO_SEARCH_FOR.*") { ... do something here
... }
is there an another, nicer, way to do this ?
thanks,
razvan radu