Hi all,
I want to pull data from mysql table inside ser.cfg.
can we declare variable within route()? which module will be used? Is it exec module?
Thanks.
regards,
jorain
Hello, i have a problem with the ATA 186 in the SER 0.9.6, when i generate a
call from my ata, when the ATA received the OK from the SER, the ATA don't
generates the ACK correctly, this missing the user in the ACK, something
like this, ACK sip:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX SIP/2.0, i believe the sip poroxy is
missing something in the OK, because i have tested this in the SER version
0.8.12 and this don't have the same problem. Do you know how can i resolv
the problem?
Hi all,
As seen in the following URL for OpenSer, I wonder if Ser supports Multi
Call-Legs accounting, (feature that OpenSer already implements):
http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.1.x/acc.html#MULTI-CALL-LEGS
I have my system just already in production using Ser, but only now I
realised that this functionality maybe lacking in Ser!... I tried to use
the directive:
modparam("acc", "multi_leg_enabled", 1)
in my ser.cfg file, but doing so, Ser doesn't start!
Is there any other way to enable in Ser this feature? How?
Regards,
Ricardo.
At 23:59 25/09/2006, Weiter Leiter wrote:
>SER goes past a couple of thousands CPS into simple proxying setups.
>However, in most common setups, the storage backends prove to add quite a drag.
Glad to second that opinion. Well -- it is easy to explain, for one SIP transaction
one has modulo six database transactions. SIP is about text processing. Database
is about I/O. So what are you going to optimize first? :-)
-jiri
>There isn't (yet?) a benchmarking SER config.
>Hence the question: how did you test?
>
>On 9/25/06, Victoria Cortez <<mailto:ser_list@conexiongroup.com>ser_list(a)conexiongroup.com> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
> I've been making some performance tests with Ser on a huge and powerfull hardware. I couldn't reach 1000 CPS. Did anybody reached or past this amount of traffic with Ser?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>Víctor
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
><mailto:Serusers@lists.iptel.org>Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Hi Folks
I am looking for anyone that is familiar with getting SER to automatically
call forward all calls coming in via IP to call forward to PSTN Gateway with
given telno. I am trying to get this up quickly to prove viability of
concept.
Hi,
How may I edit ser.cfg so that every time Ser receives an 302 reply, it
writes in acc table the "SIP contact address" of the forwarded URI
address that comes in that message?
I think that can be done with avp_write that searches that contact URI
address in SIP messages and stores it in a variable, and than using
avp_db_store to write the contents of that variable to the database,
isn't it?
But how can I do that? Any help?
Regards,
Ricardo.
Hi everybody,
with the new ACC changes, I introduced a new format for multi-leg
accounting.
The overall behaviour is the same, but it's a more flexible approach -
instead of having a fix logging frame (source and destination), the
script writer has the liberty to define whatever and how many fields to
be logged for each leg. All this is controlled via a single module
parameter - the "multi_leg_info". See:
http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/acc.html#AEN248
Regards,
Bogdan
Andrew And wrote:
> How is DNS resolution If I have some Openser destination and I use
> t_relay()?
and Klaus replied:
> according to RFC3263. Depending on the URI (numerical/domain, with or
> without port, with or without transport protocol) it us NAPTR+SRV+AAAA/A
and my question (with a GeorgeBush squint) is: "What?"
Suppose I get this on sip.example.com:
INVITE 14085551212(a)sip.example.com
What do I need to do in openser to find out if I should t_relay that to
a VoIP destination, because 14085551212 is known in the e164 hierarchy
(both e164.arpa and e164.org), versus just shipping it off to my pstn
gateway?
Thanks,
-mark