Hi Ram!
I've installed SER (sip stack) and SEMS. I managed to start both SER but I
failed to start SEMS.
I got the following error message:
"/usr/local/sbin/sems : Permission denied"
Then I found that the permission for /usr/local/sbin/sems is not 755 and the
file size of it is 0 (zero).
Why am I having this error message? Can anyone there tell me why?
Thanks.
Roa Yu :)
-----Original Message-----
From: ram [mailto:talk2ram@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 9:06 PM
To: roayu
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Can SER support 3-way Conference
On Nov 20, 2007 8:39 AM, roayu <roayu(a)ctisys.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi there,
>
>
>
> Can SER alone support 3-way Conference w/o integrate with other
> applications?
>
>
>
Hi
SER is proxy not a Media gateway
Look at SEM or ASTERISK for that
ram
Hi all,
I'd like to understand CPL the behaviour or serial forking made by CPL.
This is my CPL script (for USER A):
<incoming>
<lookup source="registration">
<success>
<proxy ordering="sequential" />
</success>
</lookup>
</incoming>
</cpl>
The first question is : In this case, if I have 2 contacts for USER A, what
is its behaviour ?
I have made a couple of tests about it.
USER A has 2 contacts : USERA@IP_1 and USERA@IP_2 and the CPL script as
above.
USER B has 1 contact : USERB@IP_3
The location table is:
ID username contact q
318 USERB USERB@IP_3 1
319 USERA USERA@IP_1 1
320 USERA USERA@IP_2 1
In this case the CPL script calls both of Contacts of USER A, at the same
time.
Then, I've changed the two contact's q parameters:
ID username contact q
318 USERB USERB@IP_3 1
319 USERA USERA@IP_1 1
320 USERA USERA@IP_2 0.1
In this case CPL script calls first USERA@IP_2 (low q paramenter) and then
USERA@IP_1 (high q-value)
ID username contact q
318 USERB USERB@IP_3 1
319 USERA USERA@IP_1 0.1
320 USERA USERA@IP_2 1
In this case CPL script calls first USERA@IP_1 (low q paramenter) and then
USERA@IP_2 (high q-value)
ID username contact q
318 USERB USERB@IP_3 1
319 USERA USERA@IP_1 0.1
320 USERA USERA@IP_2 0.5
In this case CPL script calls first USERA@IP_1 (low q paramenter) and then
USERA@IP_2 (high q-value)
ID username contact q
318 USERB USERB@IP_3 1
319 USERA USERA@IP_1 0.1
320 USERA USERA@IP_2 0.1
In this case the CPL script calls both of Contacts of USER A, at the same
time.
It seem work in the reverse mode: it call first the lowest q value and
then the highest.
So, does PROXY element (with ordering="sequential") care about q-parameter ?
Can somebody help me?
Regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Grotti
________________________
e-mail : d.grotti(a)gmail.com
Hi, i found a message on openser-user mailing list:
http://openser.org/pipermail/users/2007-April/010628.html
I'm trying to get working my openser with unixodbc+sqlite3, but i don't
know why it fails with same errors..
i think is unixodbc openser's module, because with "isql -v mysqlitedb"
i can access to my sqlite db...
someone can help me? :)
thanx
Fulvio
Somebody know what is RINSTANCE in SIP Contact?
----------------------------------------------------------------
THIAGO MALUF RESENDE
e-mail: malufrj(a)gmail.com
I Want edit the Contact field.
How I do it?
Thanks in advanced,
Thiago
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
THIAGO MALUF RESENDE
Consultor Voip e Programador WEB (Voip Developer and Web Developer)
Tel: +55 21 86042100
e-mail: malufrj(a)gmail.com
I have a simple CPL for a user "200" that just should lookup for the contact
in the "location" table:
<cpl>
<incoming>
<lookup source="registration">
<success>
<proxy />
</success>
</lookup>
</incoming>
</cpl>
In the script I do:
cpl_run_script("incoming","FORCE_STATEFUL");
and I get an error:
ERROR:core:set_dst_uri: not enough pkg memory
ERROR:cpl_c:cpl_proxy_to_loc_set: do_action failed
ERROR:cpl_c:cpl_run_script: runtime error
and the script continues but with the URI changed.
It's strange: it's obvious that CPL does a DB query to "location" table asking
for 200@domain (I've monitorized it in mysql logs) but after that it shows
the errors above and the OpenSer script continues (with the URI set to the
contact URI).
Why can it occur? maybe it's a bug?
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
This issue was already discussed. Check the following link:
http://lists.openser.org/pipermail/users/2007-May/010857.html
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Nov 16, 2007 6:53 PM, rohail khan <rohail_12(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Well save() does not work on reply route, its for request route , what I did
> is from reply route i used t_check_status("200") and route it to another
> route block let say route[6] and I used save_noreply() to save the contact
> and it saving now but the problem is that like SBC I was modifying
> registration request from UA and changing the CONTACT before relaying to my
> other server but when I am saving the contact info its saving with openser
> contact info no information for UA so call can still can not route to UA.
> any idea
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Ovidiu Sas <osas(a)voipembedded.com> wrote:
> You can call save() in the reply_route. You can check there is the
> response is a 200ok or not.
> In this particular case you will lose some informations that are used
> to handle NATed UA.
> Test and see if it will fit your needs.
>
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu sas
>
> On Nov 15, 2007 5:53 AM, rohail khan wrote:
> > Hi
> > I am trying to configure openser for uppser registration, so far I am
> > relaying the registration after modifying contact in the registration of
> > openser IP address but I want to save the contact only if the registration
> > is sucessfull from upper registration server. If I use "save_noreply" its
> > save the location no matter if the UA is registered with upper
> registration
> > server
> >
> > any idea
> > thanks in advance
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users(a)lists.openser.org
> > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Yahoo Mobile. Try it
> now.
p.s. which may be good enough. we know from interop events that having multiple contacts
with only one actual registration has actually caused some interop issues. anyhow -- it
depends on what your use case is, some of these things -- should they pay off -- are
scriptable.
At 23:01 21/11/2007, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
>It will return one contact. -jiri
>
>At 07:44 21/11/2007, Magnus Sörman wrote:
>>OK, but using alias, will that give me back both contacts in the 200 OK for a Register (unfortunately I don't have the possibility to try this right now)?
>>
>> /Magnus
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org]
>>Sent: den 15 november 2007 15:00
>>To: Magnus Sörman; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>Subject: Re: [Serusers] Implicit Registration Set
>>
>>well it depends -- doing what you are suggesting literally is quite tricky and I'm not sure this IMS feature is worth the effort. IF you would like to register and be then available under all of your aliases (both "that address"
>>and "his tel-uri"), you can easily use aliases.
>>
>>-jiri
>>
>>At 14:52 15/11/2007, Magnus Sörman wrote:
>>>Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8278E.D8F42EB4"
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>How do you/could you configure SER to use implicit registration set?
>>>If e.g. a user with a sip URI registers, then both that address and his tel-uri should be registered.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>> /Magnus Sorman
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Serusers mailing list
>>>Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>
>
>
>--
>Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
It will return one contact. -jiri
At 07:44 21/11/2007, Magnus Sörman wrote:
>OK, but using alias, will that give me back both contacts in the 200 OK for a Register (unfortunately I don't have the possibility to try this right now)?
>
> /Magnus
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org]
>Sent: den 15 november 2007 15:00
>To: Magnus Sörman; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>Subject: Re: [Serusers] Implicit Registration Set
>
>well it depends -- doing what you are suggesting literally is quite tricky and I'm not sure this IMS feature is worth the effort. IF you would like to register and be then available under all of your aliases (both "that address"
>and "his tel-uri"), you can easily use aliases.
>
>-jiri
>
>At 14:52 15/11/2007, Magnus Sörman wrote:
>>Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8278E.D8F42EB4"
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>How do you/could you configure SER to use implicit registration set?
>>If e.g. a user with a sip URI registers, then both that address and his tel-uri should be registered.
>>
>>Thanks,
>> /Magnus Sorman
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
>--
>Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Almost any unless you have a real historical one -- debian, RH, gentoo, etc,
ideally with 2.6 kernel.
-jiri
At 21:04 21/11/2007, Mary Allen (mrallen) wrote:
>Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C82C79.91616C64"
>
>Hi,
>
>I need to install the SERi proxy. Would you please let me know what version of Linux should I put in my system before the installation of SERi?
>
>Thanks,
>Mary
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/